Potential use of the Homeland Terrorism Act of 2007

H.R. 1955: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-1955

When this proposed bill was first brought to my attention I was immediately struck by the way it defines the activities of Amitai Etzioni, his Communitarian Network and all their affiliate groups, like COPS, the Mossad, the KGB, the EU, the European Court, the WTO, the CFR&TC, the PNAC, and the New Democrats, et. al. Now I've noticed others are realizing this Act can become a potential weapon against the globalist traitors operating inside the U.S. government.

From the text:

"2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change.

"`(3) HOMEGROWN TERRORISM- The term `homegrown terrorism' means the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.

"`(4) IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE- The term `ideologically based violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious, or social beliefs."

How I see this:

Amitai Etzioni promotes an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious and social change. His "idea" for creating a whole new police force is called "Community Policing." Etzioni's friendly neighborhood "problem oriented policing" uses Israeli-KGB trained SWAT cops to enforce communitarian behavior laws. Crime prevention programs ( including HUD's Weed & Seed) target individual citizens for removal from the community. Perfected in low-income and HUD neighborhoods, this scanning and analysis based program gathers "annecdotal data" during informal "knock-and-talk" interviews. This data is entered into a GIS mapping program that merges it will all other "known"data and performs, among other things, "potential for crime analysis." Community cops across the globe are members of neighborhood watch groups and community development associations... their primary purpose is to "teach" local officials how to incorporate the new principles for protecting the quality of life in the community, and then help to enforce the vision.

(It's no coincidence that Brad Pitt is following Angelina Jolie's lead into promoting the UN vision in New Orleans. Why should the former residents of NO give a hoot about Brad's "vision" for rebuilding their city? Come on, is it really Brad's vision, or does it follow UN Local Agenda 21?)

Best use abatements, public nusiance abatements, revisions to noise regulations, landlord training acts, public health warrants, entry orders, ABCD interviews, and knock-and-talks are all communitarian programs that violate the 4th and 5th Amendment Rights of U.S. state citizens. (Yet the U.S. federal courts are upholding these new property takings and privacy invasion actions by "local" police. According to them, the Bill of Rights must be "balanced." )

We have confirmed that Etzioni's Hegelian Ideas have terrorized countless innocent Americans (and Iraqis). If this legislation passes the U.S. Senate, Americans could have just the tool we need to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES against the real terrorists in our midst. The COMPASS program violates the entire Privacy Act of 1974. The ones who are changing our justice system into a communitarian police state are verifiably terrorists, and if we don't do something to put a crimp in their plans pretty damn quick, many of our people will lose everything.

Speaking of legal actions... We the People and Bob Schultz are on the U.S. Supreme Court docket. Anyone who hasn't read their Petitions for Redress of Grievances is missing out.