Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Zionist Communitarian control of the anti-Agenda 21 movement
Friday, September 10, 2010
Is Tom DeWeese misleading us on purpose?
DeWeese calls it a "socialist trap." He closes with a call for all Republicans to call and write their representatives to protest the bill because, I suppose, this will stop it, and in his expert opinion, registered Democrats (read socialists) have no reason to oppose it.
DeWeese claims he has been leading the fight against LA21 for over a decade. He tells us:
"S.1619 is the first federal Sustainable Development law to enforce the UN’s Agenda 21. It must be stopped now – or every single community in America will be forced to comply with UN policy."
The truth is, there have been many federal laws and programs that have already implemented Sustainable Development from one end of the country to another. Clinton's President's Council on Sustainable Development was created in 1993. The National Town Meetings began in the 1990s too. The Communitarian Network and Presidential Adviser Amitai Etzioni worked side by side with the Clinton Administration to be the "moral" backbone for reinventing our nation under SD principles. Rebuilding Community and SD go hand in hand.
The federal department of Agriculture changed its mission statement to promote SD in 1993. The USDA is completely devoted to SD and everything they do promotes it. Sustainable Communities is the goal of every government program already ongoing in the country. Our best universities have been teaching SD for over a decade already.
There have been numerous state laws and programs since 1992 that have implemented Sustainable Development in every state in the union. There are numerous treaties that have already put the U.S. under U.N. communitarian law. SD standards are already mandatory.
So why would Tom DeWeese, a self proclaimed "leader" in fighting SD for over a decade, tell his readers that THIS new law proposed by Dodd is the key to stopping SD?
How is it possible that this "leader" of the U.S. opposition to SD has written only one article in all his years of "fighting" SD that mentions the philosophy behind SD? Why won't DeWeese tell you about the massive communitarian legal system and bureaucracy that already "legalized" SD in the USA? Why doesn't he explain communitarian law is supreme law under the revised U.N., or that every country in the world is facing the same changes to the structure of their governments? (Global government is NOT just an American problem!)
I asked Kevin Eggers if he could explain why average people like himself and the Santa Rosa Democrats Against LA21 can so readily understand communitarianism when people like DeWeese, who claim to be experts, can continue to completely ignore it. His response:
"Communitarianism makes sense. Senator William Borah described in his book "Bedrock" (1936) how the corporations were controlling things through their monopolies in a free market system and also how the corporations controlled things in the legislation or "planned industrialism" that was supposed to be for the people's benefit. Without calling it the Hegelian Dialectic, Borah explained the Hegelian dialectic of capitalism versus socialism with the large corporations winning no matter what. Today, the left can only see the expoitation of corporate controlled capitalism and the right can only see the exploitation of corporate influenced big government socialism. Our corporate controlled education and media maintains these left right divisions so they can get away with nearly anything."Who else besides the corporate controlled media maintains the left right divisions?
Where can average people be the most effective in the war against the SD gangsters? At HOME, on their home fronts, where the SD programs claim to have the support of the whole community. Any time spent writing federal representatives about SD is a waste of time. They've already embraced the communitarian ideology. But if Americans go to their local meetings and take over their local councils... they can direct SD in any direction they choose (including straight into the garbage can where it belongs).
The bottom line is these innovative strategies to reinvent American government do not gain their validity only via national laws. Communitarian powers come from the communitarian claims that the "community" supports communitarian changes. If the residents in the community don't know anything about communitarianism, the planners have no clear opposition.
If we don't know what communitarianism is, then we can't identify the people who embrace it. If we don't know what legal theory supports SD, we can't challenge it using our legitimate local law.
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Is Obama a Muslim, a Jew, a Christian, or something more "enlightened"?
THE GREAT MUSLIM PRESIDENT
By Bernie Conrad
May 16, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
"Will America wake up in time to elect a Christian?"
http://www.newswithviews.com/Conrad/bernie105.htm
The Arab-pro Palestine press is more concerned with his Zionist beliefs:
Letter to Obama: You've Sold Your Soul for Kosher Dollars
By Mohamed Khodr •
May 12th, 2010
"I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." –Elie Wiesel, Nobel Prize Speech, 1986 http://palestinethinktank.com/2010/05/12/letter-to-obama-youve-sold-your-soul-for-kosher-dollars/How many Muslims were appointed to Obama's administration? How many Muslims has Obama nominated to the US Supreme Court? How many Protestants has he nominated?
On May 10 you announced your nomination of Elena Kagan as the third Jewish American to the Supreme Court, if confirmed, making the Jewish constitution of the Supreme Court to be one third although they only make up 1.7% of the U.S. population. The Supreme Court has no Protestant Justice despite their constituting the largest percentage of the U.S. population. I am confident that this appointment of a lawyer with no judicial experience is just another appeasement to the Jewish community to comfort their concern about your Israeli policy and to keep their money flowing to the Democratic Party. They needn't worry. No politician at any level in America dares to speak out against Israel if he/she seeks office. It's a death sentence. (Ibid)
But, Rothschild's commitment to political Zionism is not mentioned, nor his role in the establishment of the state of Israel or the Zionist purpose for "The Banker's WARS". Jones does mention Israel twice, once in regards to the Mossad security teams at Bilderberg and again when he's exposing the radiation of "dark skinned" Jewish children in a US Pentagon project after WWII. He spends half an hour explaining the Eugenics programs, how it tie sto modern programs like Planned Parenthood and the Environmental Movement, but he never once exposes the racial classification and discrimination written into Israeli (Rothschild) national law.
Jones definitely never tells us the Israeli Zionists regularly refer to Palestinians as "dogs." He tells us the Bankers' basis for the European Union was Trade Agreements (which is accurate), tells us China is a model for the new global system (also accurate), but never mentions that presidential adviser since 1979 and Obama's guru, Dr. Amitai Etzioni, the "Everything Expert" told us American neighborhoods must also incorporate the Israeli kibbutz model.
Jones never explains why the US Supreme Court now bases its decisions on Talmudic Law. He uses Dr. Michael Coffman to explain the Biodiversity Treaty and the new sustainable development terms are thrown out in one long rushing sentence, he has pictures and video footage to the Trans Texas Corridor, he ties it all to the UN Wildlands Act. But for some reason? he never mentions the words UN LOCAL AGENDA 21 or tells his audience this is the key EXISTING and EASILY AVAILABLE document that shows the details of the plan. He never introduces the program that's the most essential tool in the hands of Americans who struggle to identify the "treasonous" communitarian changes to local zoning laws and who need a LEGAL WAY TO fire the people implementing the NWO AT THE LOCAL LEVEL.
In my opinion this video falls easily into the 95% fact, 5% lie by omission category. For someone who claims to be an expert on the police state, it's beyond incredible he didn't tell us what Community Oriented Policing is when he explained the global police/military force.
Plus, I'm sorry, but it's embarrassing to watch Jones yell through his bullhorn at the "elites." His childishness disrupts and discredits this entire factual and serious presentation. He harasses the "elites" outside the secret Bilderberg meetings and yells the solution to 1984 is 1776! Gee, does Jones, like his "opposites" on the far left hope to see another violent revolution in America? Are we to believe we are helpless in the face of such sinister motives? Should free American people really take to the streets in the Hegelian tradition? Or is American time and effort better spent acting as if we ARE the government here, by closing down illegal local councils, vetoing illegal local policies, firing all the foreign "experts" and routing the elected local officials who comply with treasonous plans and actions (like what's happening in Spokane, WA right now?)?
Near the end Jones stands outside the Texas governor's mansion screaming, like he did at Bilderberg, about how "We're not your slaves!" Yeah, okay, that's an effective way to fight the NWO. It's absolutely brilliant.
I need to see the most recent film Alex Jones made where he identifies the plan as communitarian. If anyone has an extra copy of that in dvd, please send it to me at the address under the header for this blog.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Straw advances constitutional 'quiet revolution'
In the UK, the "quiet revolution" isn't so quiet.
Straw advances constitutional 'quiet revolution'
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/14/20090323/tpl-straw-advances-constitutional-quiet-81c5b50.htmlMonday, March 23 05:23 pm
Jack Straw sought to continue the government's "quiet revolution" in constitutional arrangements today as he published a green paper on rights and responsibilities.
The justice secretary wants to develop a full British Bill Of Rights and duties "as a step towards a written constitution" and today's green paper is designed to act as a framework for debate on that goal.
"If by the end of the process the Bill is perceived to provide protection to rights and freedoms then it will become effective in defining common values so that people in Britain of different backgrounds may feel ownership of it," he told the Commons.
Mr Straw said Britain's incremental constitutional development made it distinctive from other nations and argued a "similar unifying force" would be desirable in Britain.
The Bill would explicitly outline the responsibilities which go with the rights of citizenship and by so doing become "emblematic of the fair society we want to live in".
Among the responsibilities named are paying taxes, obeying the law, reporting crimes, voting, jury service and "treating NHS and other public sector staff with respect".
Mr Straw stopped short of saying the Bill would have the force of law, however, claiming that "even without full legal enforcement words have power".
Shadow justice secretary Dominic Grieve focused his criticisms on the Human Rights Act 2000, which the Conservatives had opposed at second reading but backed at third reading.
He said the opposition's concerns had been confirmed since then and warned today's green paper "can only really make matters worse".
Mr Grieve added: "It will not result in any legislation this side of the next general election – in other words, it's for the birds."
The justice secretary replied by saying Mr Grieve "protests too much", claiming the Tory supported most measures in the bill.
Fourteen months have passed since Gordon Brown, in one of his first acts in No 10, called for a "sustained debate" on the development of a Bill of Rights and Duties".
Mr Grieve said the green paper outlining the government's proposals had taken so long in coming because it had been repeatedly "scuppered" by Mr Straw's ministerial colleagues.
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Perfect example of a dumbed down Canadian
http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?s=45b88309586c0207c134396ea30877e2&t=34334&page=4
There are a lot of crazies on the internet, is about all I have to say about that site.Quote:
Who even cares if handgun ammo is short. All its for is to shoot other people.
Did anyone teach this commentor about the Rape of Berlin, the Rape of Nanking, the Cambodian Killing fields, the 40, 000+ "missing" in El Salvador, the chemicals being used on Gazans ..... ? Is he capable of learning the truth about life if it conflicts with his Fabian ideals? Mind bending is a terrible thing to withstand, and mindbent people are extremely dangerous to free men.
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Communitarians wear many disguises
"In closing, we must become acquainted with yet another term called Communitarianism, which places the importance of society ahead of the sovereign, unfettered rights of the individual. The dictionary defines it as a member of the Communist community. Our neighborhoods or communities are becoming part of the global community which is based on the belief that true community is rooted in the equitable sharing of values like political power, social justice and economic well being." (boldface added) http://www.heat-mi.org/files/SustainableDevelopment.pdf.In the 7 years since he wrote that, he's only mentioned it once (that I can find).
"It begins in secrecy and slowly builds incrementally. But step by step a structure is put into place run by communitarian law and regional governing councils of appointed, well connected, yet unknown and unreachable officials hiding behind public/private partnerships, not answerable or responsive to citizens." IS THE SPP THE BEGINNING OF A NORTH AMERICAN UNION?, By Tom DeWeese, January 26, 2007, NewsWithViews.com http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom75.htmI think the American right is purposely leading their followers away from communitarianism. Accepting the authentic, verifiable legal and academic term for the changes means they have to admit their part in helping to bring on the emerging global communitarian synthesis.
Just as many on the left are completely fooled into believing Obama's change means benevolent, anti Wall Street, socialist populism, the right is even more fooled into believing Obama's change is just some barely veiled form of communism. How convenient for the communitarians that both sides are still so totally stuck in their dialectical roles. The only way Americans will ever defeat the communitarians is if they can identify exactly who they are, exactly what they're doing, and how they're doing it.
The environmental common-ism DeWeese mentions in his "report" is actually called COMMUNITARIAN LAW in the EU. The integration procedures for nations merging into "unions" under Free Trade Agreements includes the supremacy of communitarian law clause.
Recognising and challenging communitarian supremacy of law at every level of govt is THE KEY to DEFEATING UN Local Agenda 21, Community Economic Development and NAFTA, CAFTA (and all the new "trade" agreements). The Andean Parliment is not drafting a North American Union using commonism law. Commonism law isn't the supreme law ruling all member nations.
Here's how Tom is "acquainting" his readers with the term Communitarianism:
Imagine an America in which a specific “ruling principle” was created to decide proper societal conduct for every citizen. That principle would be used to consider everything you eat, what you wear, the kind of home you live in, the way you get to work, the way you dispose of waste, the number of children you may have, even your education and employment decisions.Here's an article he wrote promoting his "new" term back in 2007 (written a couple months after my CAFTA-EU-Communitarian Law article appeared at newswithviews):
And imagine that these decisions were called “voluntary” – but that the federal government would use its full power to enforce what it has decided is “correct behavior.”
A world of common security, common standards, common markets, common currencies, and common borders in a world defined as a global “commons.”
That, my friend, is COMMON-ISM.
Incredibly, most Americans – including many of your elected officials are virtually unaware of the dangers in the Common-ism agenda. That’s because it is moving forward very slowly, one law and one regulation at a time, disguised as popular environmental policy, or education reform or even as more efficient government. Dawn of the Era of Common-ism, http://www.freedom21.com/deweese_su.asp
"Republicans too, have embraced the agenda, all the while proclaiming the Commonism brand of free trade as the vision of our founding fathers. Even after the Republicans gained control of the Congress, Speaker-to-be Newt Gingrich agreed that the lame-duck 103rd Democrat-controlled Congress should reconvene to pass the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)." DAWN OF THE ERA OF COMMON-ISM, By Tom DeWeese, May 23, 2007, NewsWithViews.com, http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom85.htmSorry Tom. The EU, the UN and the WTO don't have any case law on their court record books called Commonism law. What they DO have is fifty years of Communitarian case law at the court in Luxembourg. And, in case you're all wondering, no, Israeli senior WH advisor, guru of the US Communitarian movement, Dr. Amitai Etzioni, didn't start a Commonism Network either.
http://www.bartleby.com/59/3/wehavemetthe.html
For more about Tom DeWeese and his expertise and influence:
http://www.americanpolicy.org/about/president.htm
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
The assassination of William McKinley
What is MVSIK? (See: http://mum.org/armemcc.htm) The best explanation I could find for the word "mvsik" is that it has something to do with menstrual blood and withcraft ceremonies. Once I found that little tidbit of weirdness, I pretty much took off in other directions. As I refresh myself in preparation for Part II of my Hegel series I have come, in a roundabout way, back to considering the "deeper" implications of McKinley's torturous death. He did not die from the assassins' bullets, he was saved by a black man named Big Ben Parker. He died at the home of an attorney representing big business at the time, and there's the fact that NO qualified surgeon was allowed to treat the President's wound. McKinley was treated by a gynocologist who had never performed surgery in his career. At the time it was just all weird... but now that I think about it again...why choose a gynocologist to treat a man wounded in the menstrual Temple of Blood? And, McKinley's dying words of acceptance can be understood in several different ways. He had a full Scottish Templars funeral procession, as he was a fellow-traveler too.
What role (if any) did witchcraft and freemasonry really play in American political history? What am I to make of the connections between LSD and the 60s drug culture, the Order of the Red Dawn, alchemy, sorcery, qaballa, witchcraft, hocus-pocus, Satanism to the CIA, MK-ULTRA and all the other creepy possible aspects of the Communitarian Church? I grew up in the 70s and did more than my share of experimentation. This former 70s wild child tripped along without the slightest idea of who was behind the manufacturing and distribution of our local drug supplies. 15 year olds don't ask those kinds of questions, do they? Then, when I got sober in 1990, there was (magically?) a whole "recovery" movement just waiting to "help" me by introducing me to "advanced" spiritual beliefs, that, as it turns out, were the same beliefs held by the people who designed the drugs. By 1995 I quit the program after I recognized it as a cult, but I had NO idea what the basis for the cult actually was. Not that I "know" any more today, but the evidence I am reading is leading me to re-look at some of things I've previously ignored.
My Christian upbringing forbade indulging in the occult, yet everyone in my family was a witness to numerous psychic occurances. My mother later in her life expanded her beliefs to include astrology and reincarnation, among other things. In 1979 when I was living in Hawaii I had a dream about a car crash on the Waimea bridge, which was so vivid I told it to my roommates when I woke. Two days later I was in that car crash, and I sat on Waimea Bay alone (a very dangerous thing to do if you're a blond!) long past sunset. I was so absorbed in thinking about all the years I had ridiculed my older sister for her psychic visions, that I forgot where I was.
My sister Susan has this belief that when children suffer attrocities at the hands of their caretakers, parents or otherwise, their soul "flees" and takes refuge someplace else. I always thought that was a cop-out ideology as it removed the ultimate personal responsibily for criminal acts and it was also my pattern, as I easily discounted most anything that I couldn't understand (or gave me the creeps). The truth is, even if it's highly unlikely, my dad could very easily have been more than what he was. His military connections include special forces operatives and they all work in close association with the CIA. Recently released government records show the U.S. Army was spraying the American people with chemicals including LSD. This seems so nuts, but all these years I've been trying to figure out WHY I devoted myself so intensely to studying the Communitarians, and I can't help but wonder if I'm a CIA experiment gone awry. Of course that wouldn't (or would it?) explain my dad's absolute rules against my drug use (which I never heeded). But, one main purpose of all the CIA experimentation was mind control, and so in my case it would appear the opposite occured, unless I consider what I might have become had I not stopped my natural progress and devoted twenty years to getting high.
Either way, I was one of millions of unwitting teenage "volunteers" in U.S. government sponsored drug induced behavior research. But, instead of joining the Theosophical Movement, a witch's coven or the orgies, I just partied at keggers and in the discos, and when I was ready to quit partying, the best option for my recovery from partying was "them." I thought I was "done" with the bulk of my research (and my recovery), now I find that I haven't even begun to peel back the layers of the Communitarian Church's influences on the U.S., let alone my own psyche.
So now I have to learn more about The Nine, Madame Blavatsky, Alice Baily (who's so far not even mentioned in this book I'm reading) alchemy, freemasonry, sorcery, Christian and Judaic Cabbalah, and MVSIK. How's that for going "deeper?"
For some time after we published the Hegel tutorial I continued to seek documents that would prove/disprove our thesis. I logged what I was finding at http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.2.html
Thanks to all commenters on the last post. I appreciate the input and the concern. I am a bit suprised so many of my readers don't think I should bother "debating" upper academia even though I understand that they are as programmed to think their way as I am to thinking mine. I'm still foolishly hopeful that a genuine debate is a good thing, thinking that, at the very least, it would open it up to commoners across the globe who are being manipulated into believing the big lie. Someone from Vassar has spent a lot of time at our manifesto... maybe we'll hear from them sometime.
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Disinformation Experts
Daneen wrote me a year and a half ago when I first contacted her, claiming she had read "all" my work and planned to include communitarianism in her work sometime soon. I found her claim to have read "all" my work to be somewhat unbelievable but chose to ignore that as I was very encouraged by her promise. Since then, I have watched her rise to the front of the antiNAU pack; Lisa Long and many other "angels of truth" have taken to heralding her "great work."
Daneen Peterson writes about every aspect of communitarian law except communitarian law. She's not alone in her quest for "truth." Many other prominet expert researchers who study globalization do not include the actual global government system in their work. Why? This has never made any sense to me, but it's beginning to.
I finally learned of Daneen Peterson's background from Hodges. Here's the bio he has on her:
"Dr. Peterson is a former professor at both Temple and Jefferson Universities in Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , where she taught behavioral science research methodology and statistics. After leaving academia, she created and directed the first Department of Research and Program Evaluation for Big Brothers/Big Sisters of America's National Office in Philadelphia , PA , where she worked with some 512 agencies in all fifty states." http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Feature-Article.htm?InfoNo=026528
Here's a list of Big Brothers/Big Sisters Philadephia government partners:
Now I think I get it. The Faith Based and Community Initiatives are communitarian programs that build private-public partnerships that will eliminate constitutionally guaranteed rights. Freedom Corps is a volunteer program introduced by the Communitarian Network founder Amitai Etzioni (the one that President Bush declared in 2002: all Americans should volunteer 4000 hours or 2 years to help rebuild community). The community database of American's private information was created by HUD and implemented by DHHS. Daneen Peterson built her entire faith based organization on communitarian grants.The following government partners support our mission with necessary grants and fundamental policy initiatives:
- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
- Corporation for National and Community Service
- U .S. Department of Health and Human Services
- White House Department of Faith Based and Community Initiatives
- Freedom Corps
- U.S. Department of Education
- Helping America's Youth
If you are interested in becoming a government partner, please contact actioncenter@bbbs.org.
What is Daneen's expert background in behavioral science research methodology and statistics? A search return for that exact phrase brings us to scoiosite.net, a global reseach project. Their famous sociologists list includes the founder of the Communitarian Network, Dr. Amitai Etzioni. http://www.sociosite.net/topics/sociologists.php#ETZIONI
How well does Dr. Daneen Peterson know Dr. Amitai Etzioni? Is she aware of their sociological connection? Etzioni was president of the ASA in 1995. Was she a member? Is she familiar with Etzioni's socio-economics co-founder, former USSR President and Global Green founder Mikhail Gorbachev? Was she ever a member of SASE?
I know I said I wouldn't waste any time researching disinformation agents, like Sean I too was sure it was a diversion from my real work. But is it? If there is any connection between leading American "patriots" and the Communitarian Network doesn't that fall into my topic areas?
I wholeheartedly agree with Daneen on one point about the NAU: What you don't know CAN hurt you!.
I wholeheartedly DISagree with Daneen on another point though, and I do NOT believe Americans are too stupid to learn the REAL terms.


