Behind the Green Mask of Rosa Koire
by Niki Raapana with Nordica Friedrich
Anti Communitarian League
Friday, December 13, 2013
Silent coup, holy coup, all are
tricked, all are duped,
Round Green Virgin kills mother and
child,
Holy infanticide, death with a
smile,
Die in heavenly peace, die so the
planet can breathe.
Just as Jesus was born on a silent
night, Communitarianism was born of a silent coup. But now, after
centuries of quiet obscurity, Communitarians are popping up
everywhere! They too have risen!
Communitarianism is the miracle
ideology! It's the New World Religion. It's the New World Justice.
It's the New World Constitution. It's the New World Policing. It's
the New Human Rights. It's Big Mother! Everyone loves it. How can we
not? Gosh golly, even the Pope said Communitarianism is God's plan.
Communitarianism, according to the
Communitarians, is the final, perfect stage of human social
evolution. Anyone who does not embrace the Communitarian Goddess is
an unevolved heretic.
Thirteen years ago when the Anti
Communitarian League was first formed, most people we told about it
had never heard the word Communitarianism used once in their lives.
It appeared in so few dictionaries or encyclopedias published prior
to 1980, some people actually
accused us of making the word Communitarian up! It was so obscure it
also didn't seem very important to anyone. People figured if
it wasn't important enough to be on the news, then why should they
even care about it? It may not be recognized by facebook yet, but the
word is finally going mainstream. Now it's explaining what the word
means and why we oppose it that's the biggest challenge we face,
especially the way it's coming out.
We are convinced Communitarianism is an
emerging religious law that can have no logical opposition. If it is
allowed to continue manifesting without any barriers to its growing
power, everyone will soon learn that to deny the perfection of
Communitarianism is akin to denying the perfection of God. Our main
purpose in gathering so much research and writing so many papers,
articles, and our two books over the past ten years, was to expose
what we stumbled upon while researching what happened to us when the
City of Seattle used our neighborhood as a pilot test for
Communitarian Law in 1999.
We identified Communitarianism as the
Philosophy behind the new law in March 2000. We found the theory so
repugnant we risked life, liberty and happiness to expose the new
legal system as a fraud. We endured years of ridicule,
semi-starvation and the loss of the love and respect of family and
friends. For some stupid reason, we always assumed when it finally
came out in the open, we'd be validated.
Today the word is used more and more as
if it's always been part of the American language. Did ya know? Jesus
Christ was a Communitarian. The American Revolution was a
Communitarian Revolution. The U.S. Bill of Rights was written as a
Communitarian clause. America is coming together as Communitarians,
because Communitarianism has always been a part of everything.
We're hearing the word used frequently,
and only as a “good thing” by activists, Catholics,
Conservatives, Protestants, Muslims, Mormons, Pagans and even
atheists. We saw the Occupy Wall Street movement, the Zeitgeist and
Thrive Movements all come out as Communitarians. Community gardens,
neighborhood bbqs, people helping people... it's all now identified
as Communitarian.
It's really been amazing to witness it.
Writers suddenly throw the word out as if they've always used it and
everyone should know it's a “good thing” (some of the same ones
who told us we made it up ten years ago!). We're watching Tea Party
politicians move to the Communitarian middle (Sen Mike Lee, UT).
We're witnessing national constitutions being rewritten as
Communitarian (Bolivia, Scotland).
Everything we wrote about
Communitarianism since 2000 is happening openly today. But, so far we
haven't received one apology from one person we know who mocked us
for our research. Our family and friends haven't forgiven us (or
themselves). Nobody has nominated us for a PhD or Pulitzer in
Investigative Journalism, either (hahahaha, as if). We still haven't
been officially recognized for creating an entirely new school of
philosophical thought because, under the dialectical theory, there can never BE any scientific argument
opposing the final, perfect synthesis of all other theories.
Just in case you were wondering, ours
is the only existing reasoned opposition. Why? Not because
Communitarianism is so perfect it cannot be scientifically thrashed.
It can. That part is almost easy. It is simply forbidden to speak of
it as if it isn't a valid, final, dialectical argument against
individualism. We broke the silent rule all dysfunctional families
know; we identified the elephant in the living room.
Our academic thesis has no proper place
in academia. Not even upper academia is allowed to study or explore
all sides of Communitarianism. Communitarian controlled academia
preaches one side of Communitarianism only. Same thing with politics.
There is no Anti Communitarian Party. There has never been one U.S.
Political party with the courage to identify Communitarianism as a
life threatening ideology. Our antithesis will never become part of
the American political debate. There is none.
Communitarianism is spreading like
wildfire across the planet, but only a very narrow, controlled view
of it is allowed to be discussed. Anti Communitarianism, the way we
define it, can never be recognized as valid, even though it is more
valid than the theory it opposes. Anti Communitarianism is actually
very simple to understand, because it's a clear argument against an
unclear declaration of perfection.
We showed, with a properly laid out
antithesis, the Communitarian premise of their own perfection is
based in nothing. Communitarians cannot prove it to be the
superior theory or the superior law. There is no evidence to
support Communitarian claims of being chosen by God himself to
deliver the message of Communitarian harmony and peace to humanity,
so they can never allow for opposition arguments, especially one that
proves it to be a total scam (what the Anti Communitarian
Manifesto does!).
What we are seeing now is the word
being introduced in thousands of places, in hundreds of different
ways. It's cunningly introduced as a soft, fuzzy, milky ideology all
the way to “basically communism,” or, as in Scotland, as the
greatest thing to come down from Heaven since God gave Moses the
“law.”
In December 2002, we co-published our
now infamous paper called, What is the Hegelian dialectic? In
March 2003, we co-published Part II, The Historical Evolution of
Communitarian Thinking. We later named both parts The Anti
Communitarian Manifesto. Written to college standards, we stated
our premise and showed how we arrived at our conclusion that
Communitarianism is the final synthesis in the Hegelian dialectic.
We provided solid evidence to support our argument, and we included
the guru of the Communitarian movement, the Israeli Dr. Amitai
Etzioni, in our antithesis. We devoted years to uncovering Etzioni's
major role in the “quiet revolution.” Our research shows ample,
verifiable and conclusive evidence of Etzioni's position in the
entire global Communitarian coup.
A decade later, Big Mother arises like
a Phoenix on the ashes of the 20th century. Yet people
around the world are still forbidden to ask any of the important
questions about their global governance system. The elephant is so
huge it's stomping on everyone, everywhere, and we still can't talk
about it!
The ancient, secret, oral,
religious, legal theory behind Communitarianism must remain a taboo
topic. Talmudic Law mixed with Cabala can never be identified
as the eugenicist mystery school driving supranational global
Communitarian Law. The truth about the “Tree of Life from Zion”
must remain concealed. Opposition to Amitai Etzioni must be ignored,
shut down, or co-opted. Shhhhhh.
In places already completely
subservient to Etzioni under the Supremacy of Communitarian Law
clause, as in the EU, there can be no public discussion of the root
philosophy, lies, or false concepts that make up the Communitarian
legal theory. Thank goodness we are American writers. In our nation,
the Right to Freedom of Speech is protected under the First Amendment
to the U.S. Constitution. Lies that negatively affect the general
welfare of our citizens are not protected by law in our “free”
country.
Nothing we wrote is unsubstantiated.
Nothing we wrote has even been proved to be unverifiable. We showed
exactly how the fake capitalist versus communist dialectic was
designed to lead directly to the Communitarian synthesis. We showed
the foundation for dialectical solutions comes directly from the
Talmud and the Cabala. We showed exactly how we found UN Agenda 21
Programme for Sustainable Development fits under the global
governance model called Communitarianism.
The
United States is quietly replacing the U.S. Constitution with
Communitarian Law. Completely ignored by Western journalists, barely
mentioned by political “experts,” and never once appearing openly
on a ballot, a complicit, silent media (including the alternative
media) ensures the deadly transformation of American jurisprudence is
a great success! The only thing left to do now is mop up a few loose
ends and eliminate any traces of opposition, mainly the Anti
Communitarian Manifesto.
We are the only reasoned line of
defense between local free people and global Communitarian Law. Our
Anti Communitarian research is so solid no one has seriously
attempted to show how we are wrong in our conclusion. The best the
opposition could manage in response to our thesis was to sneer, deny,
bury, mock, change the subject, and ignore us. But now, after over a
million people have read our original antithesis, after thousands of
people now know, from us, more about Communitarianism and Zionism
than anybody is supposed to know, our enemies resort to a hideous
deception.
Behind
the Green Mask of Rosa Koire
Leading the latest wave of American
opposition to UN Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development is a
California Democrat named Rosa Koire. Rosa promotes herself as an
expert. Expert in what? UN Agenda 21? Sustainability? Most certainly.
She knows as much about the UN Agenda 21 plan as her expert teachers
at the John Birch Society do. There's no doubt newcomers learn a lot
from her. Rosa knows exactly how the plan works to take American's
private property.
.jpg){kind=small}
Rosa Koire read our original works on
Communitarianism in 2010 and emailed me to tell me it was
“excellent.” She re-named her 501(c)(4) the Post Sustainability
Institute and defined Post-sustainability as “the condition of
environmental, political, social, and economic systems after the
imposition of Communitarianism.” (Notice it does not say “law”.)
The PSI mission declares the PSI is a
“non-partisan, non-governmental think tank established to study the
impacts UN Agenda 21/ Sustainable Development and Communitarianism
have on liberty, by tracking the progression of the Sustainability
movement and forecasting likely outcomes.” The PSI mission says
Communitarianism is the “dominant form of world governance.”
At a glance it all sounds great, and
even I was kind of okay with the PSI mission, at first. But the truth
is, the ACL is the only place in the world that published any
scientific, theoretical research about LA21 being part of global
Communitarian governance. Besides our long research topic page on
Agenda 21 and Communitarianism, first published at the ACL website in
2003, the ACL published the original and only existing reasoned
antithesis to Philosophical Communitarianism. Where are the papers
produced by Rosa Koire's PSI think tank? They don't exist. The PSI
“think tank” has never published one original scientific study on
Communitarianism showing it as the foundation for LA21.
Rosa
published her book about the plan, Behind the Green Mask:
U.N. Agenda 21, in 2011. The
first two lines of her book are “The arm of UN Agenda 21 is long
and reaches into every area of the world. The Philosophy of
Communitarianism pervades this plan.”
Again,
there is no direct citation for Rosa's opening statement about
Communitarianism pervading the plan. She states it without ANY
attribution or showing how she arrived at this original conclusion.
She shows no valid scientific path she took or where she even got her
idea. She cannot defend it. She simply announces the Philosophy of
Communitarianism is behind Agenda 21 like she decided that was what
it is with magic. Rosa
cunningly states our copyrighted antithesis to Communitarianism over
and over, as if it requires no direct attribution and no clear
citation of her source.
I called it robbery
when I finally read her book earlier this year. Rosa defended her
stealing it on my blog by saying our copyrighted, original antithesis
belongs to the “public domain.” As she is a “forensic
commercial real estate appraiser specializing in eminent domain
valuation,” Rosa made her personal fortune off the government's
“right” to TAKE private property for the public good. Now she is
making money off our intellectual property, our copyrighted, private
property, protected by law under the U.S. Constitution, because she
decided it was necessary to TAKE it from us for the public good.
Rosa seems to think her “twenty-eight year career as an expert
witness on land use and property values” gives her some extra
special legal insight into what constitutes the value of our
intellectual property.
At first I was honored to be recognized
by someone of her caliber for all the published work we have put out.
After Rosa emailed me it quickly moved to voice, with us chatting it
up, sharing stories and gossip. I had the impression we were going to
become friends. I told her I was exhausted, sick, losing teeth and
steam after our decade of intense research and writing on Anti
Communitarianism. I was camping year round in Alaska (still am) and
barely scraping by. Sales of our books were slow, not enough to even
keep simple food on our table, so I was ready to do whatever she
asked of me in hopes it would increase ACL Book sales. When she
linked to the ACL and said I was a member of PSI Board of Directors,
I really thought the ACL finally had a strong ally. Except... I did
notice how she used our original thesis in her PSI mission without
attributing it to us anywhere in her mission statement.
So, it shouldn't have been such a shock
to finally learn in 2013 that for the first 107 pages of her book
she used the term Communitarianism repeatedly to back up her Anti UN
Agenda 21 position, without once citing the ACL as her source for the
connection between the two. When she finally does mention me, just me
and NOT my co-author Nordica Friedrich, it's as if I'm just someone
who taught her about the Hegelian dialectic, because I'm the world's
“foremost critic” of Communitarianism.
On page 108, Rosa says, “I learned
about the Hegelian Dialectic from Niki Raapana, the world's foremost
critic of Communitarianism. Her book, 2020: Our Common Destiny,
is an excellent analysis of the supranational movement of Sustainable
Development. The Hegelian Dialectic is the philosophical basis for
Communitarianism. The idea is that true freedom only comes through
slavery to the state because then all free will is relinquished to a
higher order (government).”
Is it clear to Rosa's readers at this
point that, “The Hegelian Dialectic is the philosophical basis for
Communitarianism” is our original thesis, or that everything they
read about Communitarianism for the last 107 pages of her book was
just an unattributed rip off of our original works? I seriously
doubt it.
There are two co-founders of the ACL,
two authors of What is the Hegelian dialectic?, two
contributors to 2020: Our Common Destiny, and,
2020: Our Common Destiny is NOT
about the Hegelian dialectic.
Rosa Koire knows how to speak up at
meetings and flyer neighborhoods, but she is not capable of writing a
whole new philosophical school of thought, as we did with our Anti
Communitarian Manifesto. Her
misleading and absolutely wrong explanation of
communitarianism, using watered down milk, is so unbelievably stupid,
I wonder why she bothered to try to “explain” it at all.
Why did Rosa start out in her opening
paragraph denying the existence of Communitarian Law, EU
Communitarian Case Law and the acquis communitaire, Communitarian
Harmonization and Norms, the Earth Charter, the Declaration of Human
Rights, the Communitarian Constitution of Bolivia, the International
Court's Communitarian case against Pinochet, and other existing legal
documents with: “Communitarianism 'balances' the rights of the
individual. Because the rights of the community are not defined in a
constitution they can change without warning or notice; one's
individual rights are balanced against a continuously amorphous
rulebook.” We'll come back to this later.
Why didn't Rosa cite us as the source
for the additional ABCD research she ads to her personal story of Jim
Diers on pages 128 to 132, especially when she says “This is
Communitarianism.” on page 130?
She refers to Seattle (where we learned
about ABCD in 2000), ties it all to “mapping community assets”
(Chapter Three in 2020), and almost verbatim quotes my 2005
One Nation Under Siege video interview where I describe the 11
page ABCD questionnaire. She refers her readers to the copy of it
posted at her website and neglects to mention we have an entire
chapter devoted to it. She got most of what she writes about ABCD and
mapping from us. We exposed the Obama's training in ABCD. We devoted
Chapter 4 of 2020 to the GIS and Mandatory Volunteerism.
Reading Rosa Koire's book, there is no indication that she “borrowed”
so heavily from two author's copyrighted works.
Exactly like we did in our book 2020,
Rosa begins her book “teaching” Communitarianism. Then she tells
the story of two womens' local resistance to the plan, and how they
found UN Agenda 21. Except for our Big Mother's Double Tongued
Dictionary and international
contributors, Rosa ends her
book exactly like we did too! Is it worth noting here that it was
Nordica Friedrich who laid out the entire format for TACM
and 2020, Nordica who
made it a “story of how two women followed a paper trail from their
lowly Seattle neighborhood to the elite boardrooms of the United
Nations?”
Did removing
Nordica's name and private property ownership from ALL our published
works make it easier for Rosa to steal it because she wasn't stealing
food directly from Nordica's babies' mouths? What WAS the point of
her doing that? It just doesn't make any sense. Did she take
Nordica's name off everything we published because Talmudic Law
requires “two witnesses” to report a crime?
According
to Property Rights expert Rosa Koire, Intellectual
Property, U.S. copyright
claimed by poor authors like us who can show over a decade of
original, published work, can't be controlled by the minds that
actually created it and copyrighted it. It's simply not ours anymore!
Why does Rosa think our
intellectual property belongs to her and the public domain? Well, our
original, hard work is just so important we don't get
to own it. Is that a decision she made based on Talmudic Law?
There is one major difference between
our stories. We gave up everything to do our research, we went broke
to sue the City of Seattle, to build our massive website with over
10,000 exit links to direct sources, and to write our books. Rosa
boasts of her fund raising skills and tells readers about how her
neighbors jumped out of their seats to write checks so that she could
sue her city. Rosa Koire raised half a million dollars for her
lawsuit (and she's doing it again now). We never raised a dime.
We were just defending principles
in Dawson v Seattle, not principal, so we had no great
outpouring of support. We were not defending our own land, so
we had zero interest from other concerned land owners. We were just
poor tenants. No business leaders were on our side. We didn't have
homeowners on our side. (What about the ACLU? That's another joke
on Americans.) Nobody cared then, or cares now, if renters have
privacy rights or not. There wasn't one group in the nation willing
to help us fight the Israeli Community Policing innovative new home
invasion strategies. There still isn't one.
Rosa
writes on page 31: “Familiarize yourself with Communitarianism.
It's the political philosophy behind all of this. It
states the individual's
rights are a threat to the global community.” {emphasis added} “It”
doesn't state that! Who is “it”?
Are we an “it”?
We, Nordica Friedrich and Niki Raapana, are human beings. We stated
it, yes we did, that is part of our Anti Communitarian legal
analysis.
Rosa Koire's rise to the front of the
Anti Agenda 21 “movement” was accomplished by promotions of her
by Property Rights groups like the Eagle Forum, Tea Party, John Birch
Society, Michael Shaw of Freedom Advocates, and somebody she calls
“Mr. X.” We were never promoted by any of these groups, except
for a short time in 2008 when Michael Shaw began citing our work and
his wife sent us a few sweet donations. This ended abruptly when Shaw
changed his mind and began promoting the “Permanent Revolution”
work of Terry Hayfield (JBS), an online wacko who had been stalking
Nordica and I in internet forums and emails with a crew that all had
names from the Wizard of Oz. Patrick Woods, editor of the
August Review, and his son Jason can testify to that bizarre
scene.
Michael Shaw dropped the word
Communitarianism from his Anti Agenda 21 lectures in 2009. He began
calling it “tyranny.” We never got any explanation of why he did
that. Tyranny? Rosa told me Michael Shaw's father is the one who
designed her vaguely familiar book cover, but who is the real author
of the outrageous claim in Rosa's book that Zionism has nothing to do
with UN Agenda 21 because Israel is a just a nationalist, tiny
country! Not even Rosa Koire is that brazen, is she?
Why would Rosa Koire lie so boldly as
if nobody would notice her big lies? The path to answers starts by
looking at the missions of leading Right Wing “free enterprise”
capitalists. We see they almost all promote a “return” to
Biblical Law and Christian values. They don't just mean the Ten
Commandments, they mean Talmudic Law. Even U.S. Supreme Court
Justices and Bush II insisted the oral, mystical Talmud is the actual
basis for the entire American justice system in 2002. The big lie
goes unchecked.
The truth is, the deadly, silent global
Communitarian coup is almost complete, and the last thing the
Communitarians need is for anyone to
understand what Communitarian Law is before it's a done deal.
Why does Zionist Glenn Beck promote
Koire's plagiarized, milky version of our work, and not ACL Books?
Why does the Tea Party patriot movement promote Rosa Koire's milk and
lies alongside the John Birch Society, and not ACL Books? Why do the
Libertarians, the Ron/Rand Paul Right, Rockwell, von Mises, Tom Woods
etc. continue to ignore or barely name the most important economic
topic of the twenty-first century? Ever heard
of a Conservative Communitarian? Libertarian Communitarian?
Why,
it's such an amazingly perfect synthesis
there's even Anarcho Communitarians now. The Third Way
synthesis merges all political ideologies and religions under
Communitarianism. It's not a murky combination of milk and water as
Rosa teaches. It's a murky combination of politics and mysticism. All
sides play a role. Rosa has obviously learned her far right Christian
Zionist pals play theirs expertly.
Our
2003 ACL mission statement is very clear that we do not endorse any
race, religion or culture that claims to be superior to everyone
else. Nordica often describes 2020
as “our treatise against racism.”
2020: Our Common Destiny shares
our conscript experience alongside evidence of U.S. Community Police
training in Israel, called “the Harvard of Anti Terrorism.” The
ACL provides an abundance of evidence of Etzioni's commitment
to Militant Zionism, and it's all taken from his own published works.
Rosa
calls identification of the role of Zionism part of “the
dialectic.” This is an utter twisting of our original thesis that
the Hegelian dialectical formula leads to Communitarianism. How
is it possible to remove the Zionist father of Communitarianism from
any expose of dialectical Communitarianism?
The Zionist father of Communitarianism
has not only written over 30 books about the need to rebuild America
into a Communitarian society, his plan for a More Muscular U.S.
Foreign Policy is cited in Daily Pentagon Briefings. In
the world of Communitarian deceptions, any outrageous lie is
possible.
What is global Communitarianism without
Etzioni, Zionism or Talmudic Law? Watered down milk.
Rosa's real reason
for stealing all our ACL research and misleading readers into
thinking it is all hers is stated clearly by her on the top of page
31, “Calling it a Zionist plot is absurd considering that Zionism
is a nationalist movement that is completely opposed to the
dissolution of boundaries.”
This reference Rosa
made to Zionism was her perfect opportunity to show her readers her
commitment to the whole truth, to full disclosure of the global
governance plan, by sharing all known facts with her readers. Doesn't
she trust her readers with all the facts? Why wasn't it important
enough for Rosa to mention at this point, or at any point in her book
when she said “Communitarianism,” that a lifelong Zionist, an
Israeli soldier adept in Cabala, whose name means he's the “tree
from Zion,” introduced the world to Communitarianism, and maybe
that's why some people might call it a Zionist plot? But of
course Rosa makes sure we get a geography lesson designed to lessen
the reality of Israeli influence based on its size: “(Israel is
about the size of Vancouver Island and slightly larger than New
Jersey.)”
Facts are just
facts. It's impossible to deny Zionism is also a spiritual commitment
to Israel made by millions of Christians, worldwide, mainly as a
result of the new Schofield Reference Bible saying any Christian who
doesn't support Israel will go to Hell. Never mind that millions of
American non-Zionist taxpayers are forced to support Zionism to the
tune of trillions. Zionism is a lot more than a little nationalist
movement, and Rosa Koire is very cunningly deceptive when she tries
to bury some facts.
How is it possible
to say such an idiotic thing when she's surrounded and paid very well
to speak by so many middle class American Christian Zionists? Besides
the Irgun family legacy assigned to Obama, Dr. Amitai Etzioni and
other notable “dual” citizens in positions of American power and
influence, besides the obvious American Jewish support for Israel,
there are millions of Christian Zionists in the USA. There are more
Zionists in America than there are in Israel. Rosa Koire doesn't know
that?
Rosa writes on page
31, “Another reason why you may not have heard of UN Agenda 21
before is because opposition is often conflated with anti-Semitism.”
The accusation of racism against Jews is a familiar tactic used
whenever anyone even barely mentions Zionism in a political science
paper, but this is the first time I have ever heard this! Opposition
to Agenda 21 was always controlled by Zionist Christians who
refused to link to our research because they said we were
“anti-Semitic.”
We think this slur
is entirely unfounded, considering the factual reality that many Jews
worldwide are ANTI Zionist, just as we are. Zionism is NOT a race of
people. It's not even a religion, it's a political ideology, and
there's a lot of traditional, Biblical Jews in the world who not only
disagree with it, they vehemently oppose it. Jews who oppose
political Zionism are sneered at by the Zionists and called
“self-hating Jews.” If we have to be labeled as haters because we
oppose Zionism, it would be more appropriate to call us “self-hating
Americans.”
I suppose Rosa's
readers don't need to know their holy Zionist Communitarian guru
Etzioni was financed entirely by another globe trotting Zionist named
George Soros, either. Rosa wants her readers in the dark forever. She
ridicules any of her readers who may ask pertinent questions about
Zionism. Is Rosa Koire a professional Zionist propagandist as well as
an expert in public domain takings?
So much for her PSI
claim to be “non-partisan!”
The
extremely partisan Zionist “resistance” to LA21 has been trying
to shut us up for a long time. They tried so many different tactics
to get us to stop using the word Communitarianism, maybe someday I'll
write them all down. But wow, I gotta say now that having someone
steal our work and revise it to fit the politically active Zionist's
need for complete impunity... that's a first.
Zionists are not
the least bit interested in exposing any facts that point to their
influential role in furthering Communitarianism, and will shut down
any writer who does. We've been working on the fringe of the Anti
Agenda 21 arena for 13 years. I say fringe because our work was
outright rejected by the Anti Agenda 21 leaders, because we include
the taboo subjects of capitalism, Zionism, Talmudic Law, and Etzioni
in our research. All we had to do to be “successful” was to
shut up about the law.
I was censored by
newswithviews for naming the Judaic Law Institute. We've been stalked
online and personally visited by Zionists for 12 years now. It's not
always the same method but it always ends at the same place; we get
told to back off. Sometimes our visitors are very friendly folks. In
2009, a U.S. Army Pentagon analyst and his wife came all the way to
Kenny Lake, Alaska to tell me to, “back off on the Mossad.” I
told Sgt Brian Bloomquist to go back to DC and put Etzioni's name in
his DoD Known Terrorist database, and then to tell the Pentagon to
send me a check for doing their job.
Ten years ago,
Etzioni's office staff claimed in an online public forum that we said
Communitarianism was a Zionist plot. (One Etzioni assistant, Erin
Riska, confirmed some of our Etzioni research that was speculation at
the time we wrote it.) So, yes, we have heard ACL research is taboo
before, but the first time I heard Agenda 21 called a Zionist
plot is when Rosa Koire took her place on the national stage.
Our rights to privacy and
self-determination were “balanced” because U.S. COPS
are taught in Israel that we have “too many rights in this
country.” National opposition to UN Agenda 21
wouldn't even begin until almost a decade after we were the pilot
test for Etzioni's SWAT home inspections.
Rosa, who entered the arena almost two
decades after UN Agenda 21 was adopted at Rio, mentions all the
programs we wrote about. She knows Community Policing was a topic
page at the ACL since 2003, it's the title of Chapter Two in 2020,
but she never refers to us, our research, or our story, not once when
she continually throws out program terms she took directly from ACL
research. Leaders of the Agenda 21 resistance never include our
grassroots experiences with Zionist Community Policing tactics.
Our current book
project, Round Green Virgin, will be finished after we get the
funds to complete it. The hardcopy edition of 2020/TACM was
such a financial disaster our enemies will say we should quit
publishing altogether! Certainly Rosa Koire demanded I quit. Rosa
insisted I hand it ALL over, so her and the Shaws could take control
of our books. (Michael Shaw is also the same man who quit citing us,
quit using the term Communitarianism, and then told me the word
Communitarianism would NOT be part of the Anti Agenda 21 “movement”
in 2009.) Her reason? People want the books they pre-paid for and I
owe her $1000 for the plane ticket to her 2011 Behind the Green Mask
conference.
The fact that I was
really too sick to fly was not a valid “excuse” for not going.
When Nordica was all prepped and set to go in my place, Rosa refused
to allow her to come. Nordica Friedrich was not welcome to speak at
the first national conference focusing on Communitarianism and Agenda
21! (How's THAT for controlled opposition?) Of course Michael Shaw
was the Featured Speaker, and the rest, as they say, is history. As
for Nordica's copyright on both our books and her 100% ownership of
our website and our ACL Books company... well, let's just pretend she
doesn't exist, shall we?
Rosa never once
offered to purchase the rights to reprint our copyrighted
research. She showed utter contempt for the decade of sacrifices we
made to create Anti Communitarianism. Our position as poor, humble,
non-affiliated authors always made us look like easy targets. So, why
pay for it?
Rosa spends half a
page admonishing her readers to drop any valid scientific inquiry (as
in What is the Hegelian dialectic?) because identifying
religious and political concepts is “not productive, not
realistic.” She says naming all the players, religions and economic
theories that make up the
Communitarian
philosophy “feeds right into the dialectic.” Rosa says we all
need “to come together.”
Somebody please
explain to Rosa, after she's done singing her Beatles' tune, that a
legitimate study of Communitarianism must include all known facts
about it, or it is not a scientific study.
The honest
scientist is not allowed to remove hard evidence from the table just
because they have a financial attachment to hiding that piece. Our
work was not non-profit, grant funded, or government controlled.
We've never been government employees! We don't censor facts. We
include every religion and every political system that contributes to
the final synthesis. We examine communism, capitalism, fascism,
socialism and Zionism, as they all relate to achieving the final
Hegelian dialectical synthesis.
Zionism is a
political system based on dialectical religious law, and there is way
too much evidence of its influence on Communitarianism (and communism
and capitalism) to deny it. Who determined Zionism cannot be exposed
along with the theory it supports? Who decided to drop the most
important word “law” from any future discussion of
Communitarianism? And, why would they?
Rosa says in her
acknowledgments at the very end of her book that my books
“were invaluable in making sense of the source.” I find that so
vague. “Sense of the source?” What source? My co-author
Nordica who she removed? And, oh my God, if by I helped her make
sense of the source she means Hegel, then that's just over-the-top,
because based on her stupid water and milk demonstration, I obviously
didn't help her understand our antithesis against Hegel and
Communitarianism at all!
Wait! She must mean
Dr. Etzioni! He is the true “source” of all modern
Communitarianism, is he not?
What does
Rosa Koire tell her readers about our Communitarian guru, Amitai
Etzioni, Dr. Tree of Life from Zion? What does Rosa Koire
write about our Communitarian guru's 60+ years in Israeli military
intelligence, his religio-political cult, his Fabian Socialist
mentors, his influence on the White House, his KGB global Community
Policing network, his global influence on local sustainability
projects, his programs for mandatory volunteerism, or the
Communitarian Network he founded in DC in 1990?
Shhhhhhhh.
Amitai Etzioni is hidden from her
readers; Rosa Koire never even mentions his name.
And... good grief... she says there is
only an “amorphous rulebook.” That's
so not true, not even in the U.S. where it's all very quietly done.
Communitarianism is not all shapeless soft law, Delphi Technique and
shaming. It's not only coming down under UN Agenda 21 or Sustainable
Development. It's not only an attack on American's Property Rights!
It's not an uncomfortably vague, unformed, unstructured plan or
program for development. It's a massive, very structured, organized
global justice system.
On her very first page Rosa writes:
“the rights of the community are not defined in a constitution.”
Why would she write something so easy
to be checked and so easily proven to be untrue? She knows the
Bolivians rewrote a Communitarian Constitution in 2009, two years
before she published her book. How will she explain the newly
revised Communitarian Scottish Constitution? And the next one? Did
she miss the part in our book where we cited the blueprint for Global
Communitarian Citizenship?
Rosa freely plagiarized our thesis and
program research, but she not only avoided our constitutional
law and Etzioni research, she purposefully negated it, as if
somebody told her it was all taboo.
Rosa knows the 2005 EU Constitution was
written with a Communitarian Supremacy of Law clause. She knows the
foundation for trade unions under the WTO establishes Communitarian
Law. She read it in our book, a book full of direct source citations
of laws and constitutional changes, even in the U.S.
Rosa knows the changes to the law in
the USA. She read, “In the state of Oregon, an evolving law of
search and seizure suggests that communitarian precepts can be
translated into workable and coherent State constitutional doctrine.”
Taking Law Seriously: Communitarian Search and Seizure,
American Criminal Law Volume: 27 Issue 4 Dated (1990) pp 583-617.
It's cited in 2020: Our Common Destiny.
What Rosa surely knows is, if we can't
look at Zionism, maybe we won't take Talmudic Law seriously,
In 2012, the Communitarian Pachamama
cult unveiled their proposal for the Eleven Laws of Nature,
described as “Human Rights for Mother Earth.” The proposal calls
for a new UN international court with authority to try and convict
anyone, anywhere, in any nation, who violates Mother Earth laws.
The Affordable Health Care Act,
taking effect right now in the USA, is a Communitarian Law. The
“right” to mandate purchase of health care insurance is based
entirely in Etzioni's vision for the world. The enforcement arm for
this U.S. Communitarian Law is the Internal Revenue Service, which
has been proved, in U.S. Courts, time and time again, to have no
constitutional authority to exist. The “right” to tax, fine,
shoot and jail citizens, to make them to pay for programs that
destroy their “right” to life, liberty and happiness, is a
Communitarian “right.” This is what Dr. Etzioni means by
“balance.”
On January 1, 2013, Pope Benedict
declared, “Communitarian Development is God's Plan.” Should we
all be preparing for an Inquisition against anyone or any nation who
defies development?
What lengths will the Communitarians go
to ensure the success of their global coup, besides misleading
basically decent, kindhearted Americans? We need look no further than
the bombed out ancient civilizations in the Middle East, some very
stubborn holdouts against Etzioni's more moral,
peaceful Communitarianism.
The phony, circular, go-nowhere
dialectical wars between the Americans and the Arab world are
absolutely necessary to leading the unwashed refugee Arab masses to
accepting sub-nation status under Communitarian Harmonization of
Norms. History shows us the Arab nations were strong American allies
all the way up until 1948, before Etzioni and his terrorist buddies
took over Palestine. The first really successful Communitarian
project put the Palestinians behind a “Berlin” wall. The Green
Space between national law and Communitarian Supremacy of Law is not
a hidden agenda. The only “green mask” over UN Agenda 21 in the
Middle East is the one the Zionists use to shield it from Americans.
There have been a few minor glitches to
the plan. There are actual human beings involved as pawns, and they
are sometimes unpredictable. But, regardless of how the war actually
began, and why, the demands the Syrian refugees make now come
directly from the old Zionist-communist playbook. Demands for
positive Human Rights, very caring people insisting on fake UN rights
that lead to final destruction of the world's most ancient Muslim
strongholds, these are powerful Communitarian tools.
Communitarian developers are all over
the world now; fellow travelers work their activist magic to foment
the changes. The difference between cons and locals is simple; real
locals fight to win and END the conflicts, whereas destruction of
people, cultures, religions and neighborhoods is the Communitarian's
first and primary goal. The cons
feed off the RE-building too.
They love rivers of local blood
and millions of homeless refugees. Their only real job is to ensure
the locals argue dialectically until the cows come home or keep
shooting 'til there's no more bullets, so they can sink their
Communitarian development plan into the veins of the peace talks and
settlements, as the only “moral” solution.
Hollywood actress turned UN Goodwill
Ambassador Angelina Jolie touched the hearts of millions with her
recent plea to help Syrian refugees. The new Communitarian high
priestess (miraculously reborn into Mother Teresa II) didn't explain
her humanitarian interest in Syria coincides with her family's
financial investments in the UN Millennium Development Goals in
Cambodia and U.S. Cities.
Pro-Syrian refugee activists insist her
monetary motives do not matter. Any help is good help, right?
The authenticity of famous people or
experts teaching us “truths” is really not an issue, is it? So
what
if our heroes support a few “nice”
Communitarian programs, like Rosa's story about how she got involved
in fighting UN Agenda 21 because she wanted to volunteer to do some
Community Service.
Supranational global governance is
based upon Communitarian Law. The Law is a perfectly balanced
mystical combination of all the world's philosophies, all the way
back to the beginning of human history. The authors of this new age
religion, of this complex global law religionalized, are busy as
little bees incorporating every religion and legal system on the
planet. No religion, no nation is safe.
What about that peculiar U.S. barrier
to an Established State Religion at the foundation of American
religious tolerance? Oh, you mean
the ridiculous American LAW that declares everyone is free
to follow their own conscience? Don't ya know? It's outdated and
spiritually unevolved. It doesn't apply!
As our sweet little old Israeli
Communitarian guru says:
“The First Amendment's
Disestablishment clause is not a foreign policy tool, but a
peculiarly American conception. Just because the
American government is banned from promoting religion within the United States does not mean
that the State Department and the Pentagon cannot promote religion
overseas and in societies that are undergoing profound societal
changes.”
Etzioni
continues, “The last
point is crucial. Overseas
we are participating as a key architect and builder of new
institutions; we are in what social scientists call 'the design
business.'”
The key U.S.
architect rebuilding Arab religious institutions is Etzioni. We're to
believe the Arabs hate the U.S. because they “hate our freedoms,”
not because we're in the “design business.”
Time for a Happy Holiday drink!
Here's a new alcohol free recipe with a punch:
Mix ½ cup
Etzioni's vision with ½ cup Bolivian claims that their 500 year old
Goddess Pachamama is rooted in their ancient Communitarian
traditions. Add 4oz shot of U.S. Senator Mike Lee (UT) and his Mormon
Communitarianism. Top it off with the Vatican calling it all “God's
plan.” Spice it up with the Islamic Communitarian Imperative by the
Futhula Gulen in Turkey and Chiara Lubich Communitarian spirituality.
Liberally garnish with American Methodist Communitarian soul. Slide
angelic Lucifer enlightenment down the straw. Stir lightly. Now, take
a drink and see if you can keep from gagging.
This Christmas season, do something
exceptionally meaningful. Please give generously to our Anti
Communitarian League research. We're hanging in there with nothing.
If the ACL disappears, there will never be any scientific opposition
to Etzioni or Communitarianism. Our “last point is crucial”
too.
What kind of new theory of global
justice needs absolute freedom from logic? Not the good kind.
“Conscience? Ah, that
stuff will drive ya nuts.”
Marlon Brando as Terry in
On the Waterfront
To order your $17 ebook copy
of 2020: Our Common Destiny & the definitive Anti
Communitarian Manifesto, go to
http://nord.twu.net/acl. We're
also starting our first newsletter. To sign up for our newslist or to
contribute anti communitarian research to our new magazine, please
visit the newly updated site soon! The new roster of ACL contributors
is fantastic and shows the far-reaching range of people in exotic
places who've recognized something “else” was going on that
nobody had a name for.
