Survivalist Blog - fantastic book giveaway!

Not only am I an anticommunitarian, I"m also what's called a "prepper" and a survivalist. It's been mostly a personal journey, this roughin' it life I'm living, but I do enjoy and appreciate reading other people's experiences. Sharing information with people has been one of the few fun things I do online. I have grown and learned a lot from the people who send me links and recommend literature. What's the point in my knowing about the emerging synthesis of ideas and the regional to global justice system if I'm not going to use it to my advantage? Thanks M.D.!

M.D. Creekmore over at the The Survivalist Blog – a survival blog dedicated to helping others prepare for and survive disaster – with articles on bug out bag contents, survival knife choices and a wealth of other survival information is giving away a Go Berkey Water Filter System (a $139.00 value)! To enter, you just have to post about it on your blog. This is my entry. Visit The Survivalist Blog for the details.

Watched Aaron Russo's Freedom to Fascism last night. It was the best explanation of the Tax Honesty movement I've ever seen, but then it's the only one I've ever seen. While I don't trust several of the "our side" experts he interviewed (Ruppert, Fitts, etc) it didn't detract one bit from his presentation of the story. How the bankers seized covert control over the United States is essential knowledge for Americans who choose to resist the emerging harmonization of norms. I did not like his recommendations for action at the end, but I never like the suggestions that we get organized and march on Washington DC. I don't believe we can restore constitutional govt using Marxist street actions. Plus, near the end Russo tells us our founders gave us our freedom. But that's a weird way to say it, because our founders did not GIVE us our freedom, freedom to live comes from our Creator. Our founders secured their economic freedom from an empire who considered common men wage slaves/subjects. We have secured nothing for ourselves.

If we really are the masters here, then why would we stand outside our servants' offices and protest their erroneous policies and laws? Why wouldn't we draft a resolution and vote/pass a people's initiative? If protecting our property and prosperity is the only legitimate purpose for govt and we have the power to fire them and restore the rule of law, then why would we need to protest in the streets? To me it's the sign of our corrupted nation. I wish Russo would have ended the film with a contact address to help instigate a statewide national referendum to put a cap on the feds... revoke executive order privileges, end the federal reserve, nullify the IRS, abolish Agenda 21 and sustainable development, and fire every Czar and office created to outmaneuver the US Constitutional requirements for separation of powers. We are the law here, that is our only power... and that is the only way we can restore our power. Maybe somebody out there is writing this document right now.. maybe Spokane, WA is our pilot test.

And if one more history expose tells me the progressive takeover of the federal government began under President Wilson, I'm going to write an entire book about what happened in 1901.

Spokane, WA leads the nation in throwing the bums out!

Here's an educated and active bunch of American patriots. I kind of hate that term anymore, but these people look like they deserve the title in an honorable way. This really is fantastic news for us who oppose the entire sustainable development agenda. I just wished outloud on fb that the Tea Party would complain about something I can relate to and then I opened freedom advocates mail from Shaw. So hey Chris!!! Is this what happened with the info you took to Spokane last year? :)

Text of Charter Amendments submitted as follows:
Ordinance
Submitted by; Michael Fagan, 1523 E. Dalton Ave., Spokane, WA 99207

An ordinance relating to preventing membership in and relationships with the
International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), the United
Nations, and other organizations undermining United States Sovereignty; amending
the Charter of the City of Spokane adopting a new section 34.5, repealing
conflicting sections of the Spokane Municipal code, adopting a new section
01.04.035 to title 1 of the Spokane Municpal Code, and providing
severability.

WHEREAS, in the name of "sustainable development" as documented under United
Nations Agenda 21, property rights are often arbitrarily stripped of citizens in
the pursuit of a public policy that provides the community little to no tangible
benefits. Under the guise of environmentalism, Agenda 21 is a subtle attempt to
gradually take away the freedoms and liberties of ordinary Americans,
restricting them to urban centers where they can be more readily controlled by a
strong statist government. At the same time, through Agenda 21 implementation
and the associated Wildlands Project, people are gradually banned from large
patches of rural environment where they would more readily be able to escape the
increasingly Orwellian control structure of the government. Many of the
principles represented in Agenda 21 were recently promoted in the City of
Spokane by Envision Spokane via an initiative labeled a "Community Bill of
Rights" which would give rights to inanimate objects and restrict the liberties
of individual business owners and property owners.

the rest is here:
http://www.freedomadvocates.org/articles/sustainable_development/kick_iclei_out%21_20100410407/

Spokane plans to adopt Kyoto Protocols this Monday. Local objector needs our support.

CALL TO ACTION!

The City of Spokane, WA made a new move towards adopting the Kyoto Protocols without any public awareness or debate (let alone a democratic vote). A local woman who attended the meeting was able to delay it until this coming Monday. This is a call to anyone within driving distance to Spokane who could possibly attend this meeting to support this lady in her attempt to stop communitarian laws. Please email me for more info and put "Spokane" in the subject line. Thanks!

What does it mean when an international treaty fails "to win domestic support" in the USA? Does it mean our elected officials should endorse it anyway? Or are we like the Irish, who have to keep voting and voting until we get it "right?" And how can our Mayors endorse everything from the Earth Charter to the Kyoto Protocols if these UN laws have no domestic support? If our national and state law declares the only legitimate purpose for any government is: "to protect and defend individual rights" then under what authority are these agreements made?

Are Americans (or any other nationals) required to submit to a legal system they neither voted to install nor knew anything about it before it was adopted? How many other "treaties" have our local governments signed, in violation of the constitutional parameters for states and municipalities making separate treaties with foreign governments? When did the Mayor get the power to adopt international codes and regulations, and an army of new community "cop" enforcers whose sole purpose is to change the behaviors of "bad" American individuals?

"Section Ten, U.S. Constitution: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility."

In Big Mother's world, "scientist" is a "Title of Nobility" and their word is final. (Our double-speak dictionay defines them with one word: God.) So yes, let's all hope to avoid the embarassment of the last Kyoto Treaty:

US hopes to avoid repeat of Kyoto Protocol
http://www.wtop.com/?nid=105&sid=1634844
March 27, 2009 - 11:25am
By VANESSA GERA
Associated Press Writer

BERLIN (AP) - The Obama administration wants a politically viable new global climate deal that avoids the fate of the Kyoto Protocol, which failed to win U.S. domestic support, a senior U.S. official said Friday.

Climate change envoy Todd Stern said the administration will be guided by a mixture of "science and pragmatism" as it helps craft a new agreement this year to control emissions of greenhouse gases.

Stern said that would help the administration avoid a repeat of what happened with the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. U.S. officials negotiated a deal in Japan that failed to win domestic support.

The U.S. refusal to join the program to reduce emissions drew sharp international rebukes, and later fueled perceptions that George W. Bush's administration was opposed to global cooperation and environmental preservation.

On the eve of talks marking the Obama team's debut in the U.N. climate change negotiations, Stern said the U.S. is committed to getting a deal that will help prevent the devastating effects of global warming _ and also be politically viable.

"We do not have any interest in the United States in having a repeat of the Kyoto experience, where we signed an agreement that is dead on arrival when we brought it back home," Stern told reporters at the U.S. Embassy in Berlin.

"We need to be guided on this internationally by a combination of science and pragmatism," he said. "It does not serve anyone to do a week-kneed compromise that doesn't move us in the direction that the science is telling us we need to go."

"By the same token, it doesn't serve anybody to have an agreement that is scientifically pristine and perfect and which cannot be supported by our public back home," Stern added.

Stern was named special envoy for climate change by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. He was the chief U.S. negotiator at the Kyoto Protocol talks in the administration of former President Bill Clinton.

Stern heads to Bonn this weekend for the opening of talks running March 29-April 8 _ the latest round in an effort to seal a successor deal to Kyoto in Copenhagen, Denmark, this December.

Stern said he hopes the U.S. Congress can pass domestic legislation in the coming months which would back up any international commitments that Washington would make as part of the treaty.

He stressed, however, that a failure to pass legislation by December would by no means spell doom for a Copenhagen deal.

Obama has said he wants to sharply reduce emissions of greenhouse gases responsible for rising sea levels, increasingly unpredictable weather patterns and other environmental problems.

During his election campaign, he pledged to reduce carbon emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, and 80 percent by 2050. He earmarked about $80 billion for renewable energy technologies in his economic stimulus bill of nearly $780 billion.

"It is a core priority for the president _ both at the domestic level and the international level _ and I wanted to signal that by coming personally" to the beginning of the talks in Bonn, Stern said.

"Frankly, the United States has been on the sidelines as far as we're concerned for the last eight years and that's going to stop," Stern said.

(Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)