Thursday, January 7, 2010

Britain 2010 - Common Purpose corruption and communitarianism

In 1978 the idea for a unified Europe was called Eurocommunism.

Many thanks to our friend John at SCP for writing this. Whereas John included it in his overview at SCP, I'm finally learning more about Antonio Gramsci from Martin Malachi's book. Gramsci's idea for promoting global Marxism is another key to understanding communitarian thinking. John has generously agreed to allow us to reprint this in the 2010 edition of 2020. We'd still like to include articles from nationals around the world.

Britain 2010 - Common Purpose corruption and communitarianism

Political spectrum Download Britain 2010 -Common Purpose corruption and communitarianism as .pdf.

We are living at a particularly momentous time in history.

In order to understand what is happening in Britain in 2010, you first need to know about a political philosophy called 'communitarianism'.

Communitarianism, aka Tony Blair's 'Third Way', has been implemented by stealth in Britain over the past few years by this New Labour government.

Communitarianism is difficult to pin down. It is...

a. a strange mixture of capitalism and communism. Communitarians want social control in a collectivist and corporatist society;
b. a type of neo-communism that owes some of its ideas to Gramsci and the Fabians;
c. a 'Big Brother knows best' type of philosophy.

Communitarians want...

a. to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society known as the 'New World Order' run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants. In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state.

b. group rights dominant over individual rights;

c. highly-taxed capitalism merged with social collectivism, administered through QUANGOs and fake charities. They call this 'civil society'.

The communitarians, through stealth, perseverance, duplicity, and subversion, have snatched individual-rights based democracy right out from under our noses, and replaced it with group-rights based communitarianism - a trendy, innovative, and newish form of communism administered by foreign elitists.

They are convinced that a communitarian system is 'better' for society - 'improved social cohesion' is the central tenet of their political ideology.

Obama, Blair, Brown and Mandelson et al are Fabian communitarians and Cameron and Clegg show distinct communitarian tendencies, although you will not have heard them use the term. The truth of their hidden agenda is now known and we know their real intentions. These people are front-men for the New World Order communitarians.

Communitarian policy has been seen as fascist corporatism with the primary difference that instead of focussing on nation states, own country and people, it propagates a supranational policy. A secondary difference is it influences by means of informal social structures, like for example Common Purpose, instead of by institutionalised State violence - at least for the time being.

Communitarianism is aimed just like fascists, socialists and communists at the collective. The interests of the collective always prevail above the interests of the individual. Individuals must subjugate themselves to the 'common good'. Communitarians create imaginary problems such as global warming, terrorism suppression and the bank crisis to force through their ideas.

Common Purpose

Common Purpose is a change agent being used to recruit and train the commissars and apparatchiks needed to implement New Labour's hidden EU communitarian agenda.

In 1973 the UK joined the Common Market and in the 1975 referendum the people of Britain were conned into voting in favour of staying in the Common Market.

Prime Minister Heath, whose government entered into the accession treaty, and Prime Minister Wilson, who arranged the referendum, both knew that the Common Market was simply a stage in the development of the European Union.

At some point, those behind the take-over of Britain by the EU realised that they needed people whom they could trust to manage the new bureaucracy.

Enter Common Purpose, which was established to recruit and train the commissars and apparatchiks needed to run this bureaucracy.

New Labour's Hidden Agenda

Since 1997, the New Labour government has been working to two agendas. Firstly, the open agenda as laid out in their manifestos and secondly, their hidden agenda.

The objective of the hidden agenda of New Labour is the creation of a communitarian society controlled by the EU collective.

In order to achieve this objective, the New Labour government has been running a parallel administration made up of QUANGOs and fake charities. A fake charity is legally a charity but effectively operates as a government department, receiving a substantial amount of funding directly or indirectly from government and operating as a government department.

Common Purpose is a fraudulent 'educational charity' acting as a change agent and recruiter and is part of the management mechanism being used to carry out this hidden agenda of New Labour.

Whilst carrying out the hidden agenda of New Labour, Common Purpose has corruptly abused millions of pounds of taxpayers' money.

Common Purpose is guilty of defrauding YOU of YOUR money.

Some people think that Common Purpose is simply a criminal organisation set up to siphon off public money but there is a lot more than that to the Common Purpose agenda.

What is Common Purpose?

On the surface, Common Purpose is an educational charity, registered in the UK under number 1023384, that does leadership and networking development training.

However, Common Purpose is not what it appears to be on the surface.

In reality, Common Purpose is a corrupt, subversive, secretive and deeply sinister organisation with a hidden agenda (communitarian social control, corporate and EU state control) and hidden backers (Tavistock Institute, Fabian Society, Brussels).



angry cheese said...

Another excellent article from Stop Common Purpose.

Tom said...

Difficult to make accurate assertions of how UK society functions if you’re not interacting with it (ie part of it).

Although the concept of “fake charities” being government departments hints at a truth – it is accurate to say that government is the major funder for many charities now in a way they didn’t used to be and therefore assert some control over their operations. It is a form of outsourcing rather than a sinister plot to subvert democracy or control the population etc. E.g. homelessness organisations often are funded by government - funding is generally specific e.g. for a set number of hostel bed spaces etc. therefore criteria for gaining access to these bedspaces is set by government rather than the charity. But charities have the freedom to raise money from government (with conditions) or through more traditional means. It makes sense for government to fund the experienced operators in some areas traditionally the domain of charities as it is more cost effective than expanding a government department and why not leverage what already exists?

john said...

I have a vote on Tuesday, Jan 19, 2010 in the Massachusetts Special Election to fill Ted Kennedy's vacant seat. Kirk is the interim.

Here's the crux of the problem I face.

Do I go with the GOP Scott Brown who could potentially end the progressive super majority and ObamaCare?

Do I go with my Libertarian beliefs and vote for a neophyte in Joe Kennedy (no relations to bootlegging dynasty)?

I vowed to never endorse a Democrat or a Republican but these are unusual circumstances. It's a very close election. Kennedy has zero chance of gaining more than 3%. If the Democrat Coakley wins, she will give the progressives carte blanche ability to do pass anything they want.

I would love to hear your thoughts.


Stop Common Purpose said...

I suggest a tactical vote for Scott Brown.

angry cheese said...

If the British "government is the major funder for many charities now in a way they didn’t used to be and therefore assert some control over their operations" then let's be honest in describing these "charities." Many are actually performing a public duty that formerly, or otherwise, would or should be carried out by a public body under local or national government. By receiving tax payer's money in the form of a grant or tax-free status, they become a public body and should be answerable - as any public body is, to the tax payer under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The fact that this is not the case seems highly dodgy to me and many others, and it is interesting that this hiving-off into quangos and NGOs (under "directives" from the EU) is taking place as Common Purpose (itself a "charity") is training community cadres to oversee these unaccountable community projects and setting up even more "charities."
Eg: Where local council housing depts. which would have come under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, are now housing "trusts" and the Act does not therefore apply. See link:

Response to Ministry of Justice consultation. Freedom of Info Act 2000: Designation of additional public authorities:

Sadly, there was another British Gov. whitewash and these "charities" remain free to carry on conning:

Freedom of Information Act will not apply to charities. By Paul Jump, Third Sector, 28 July 2009.

Can't you see what's going on here, everyone?

"The British government is the major funder" means "the British people are the major funder," and the people should have a right to look into these organisations.

john said...


Thanks. I did.

It was purely "tactical" to prevent the progressives from gaining a 60 vote super majority.

Secondly, it gave dissenting groups like the anti-Tax Tea Party much needed exposure.

Anonymous said...

Yes and the USA has caught the disease as well.