Thursday, November 26, 2009

Etzioni's IDEAS used by Climategate "scientists"!

1000 thanks to our giving friends in the UK who took the time to read these docs!

Unearthed Files Include 'Rules' for Mass Mind Control Campaign
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=28101
Jurriaan Maessen

On page 19 of the Powerpoint Presentatation
Collaboration: The Case for Strategic Pragmatism:

"Etzioni distnguishes between Coercive, Calculative and Normative Compliance. Coercive or physical power is related to total institutions, such as prisons or armies. Calculative compliance is related to 'rational' institutions, such as companies. normative compliance is related to institutions or organizations based in shared values, such as clubs and professional societies."

Our ACL homepage poll shows an overwhelming 91% of the respondents DO NOT want to overturn the US Constitution in favor of Communitarian Values. Etzioni's "shared values" are actually only shared in professional societies that promote global governance.

Here's clarification of where the above referenced paper came from:

Re: Climate Scandal - Futerra - Tavistock - Etzioni

Ok, guys. I should clarify that the Powerpoint document was NOT part of the hacked emails hacked from CRU. I obtained that from the British Library Archives after noticing the Tavistock signature within Futerra's methodology. The presentation hints at collaborative strategies...


Tavistock are everywhere:

http://www.facebook.com/l/9ef9f;www.theplace2be.org.uk/default.aspx

http://www.facebook.com/l/9ef9f;www.campaign-for-learning.org.uk/cfl/index.asp

http://www.facebook.com/l/9ef9f;www.ican.org.uk/

http://www.facebook.com/l/9ef9f;www.btbetterworld.com/

http://www.facebook.com/l/9ef9f;www.changeit.org.uk/index.php/what-is-changeit/

http://www.facebook.com/l/9ef9f;www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/

And more...


What piqued my interest was noticing the Climategate, Futerra, Tavistock and Etzioni
all cosied togather.


Sorry for the confusion.


More revelations to follow in due course. ;)
Here's where my good friend Bobby Garner went with the hacked emails. Game Theory came up during our Hegelian dialectic research, but as a non scientist I steered way clear of that aspect. Bobby has the science background and works in a technical field, he's been instrumental in my basic understanding of the role science plays in the Communitarian plan for a new "global architecture." He sees the possibility that the emails were leaked as propaganda:
You have heard the news of the release of e-mails from the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia. The influential CRU claims the world's largest temperature data set, and its work and mathematical models were incorporated into the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) who's reports on Climate Change since 1992 have guided all world government's policy for meeting the dangers of Global Warming.

A few weeks ago, I wrote in "Intellectual Technology and Game Theory In Perspective" (new comments added) in regard to "Reference Framing:
All frames of reference rest upon certain hypotheses, postulates and a priori assertions, assumptions and beliefs. The degree to which those hypotheses, postulates and, assertions are true defines the range of validity for every frame of reference. Each of those hypotheses, postulates and a priori assertions must be preserved if the frame of reference is to be maintained. The point at which they break down is where a particular frame of reference becomes ineffective and invalid. Therefore, by tampering with the hypotheses, postulates and a priori assertions, the reference frame may be shifted in any direction. Public Polling and so called "Scientific Studies" in combination with an effective propaganda machine, are hugely effective in disturbing the underlying hypotheses, postulates and assertions which demand a shift in the points of reference. All of the big issues of the day from feminism to gay rights to climate change and dozens more are all examples of a shifting social frame of reference. Each of them is the product of a winning game strategy devised by the global strategists.
Global Warming is an application of Game Theory defining a reference frame based on specific hypotheses, postulates, a priori assertions, assumptions and beliefs. Their basis in truth "defines the range of validity" for the "game" known as Global Warming.

Speaking of the validity, the hypotheses, postulates, a priori assertions, assumptions and beliefs supporting Global Warming have suddenly come under intense scrutiny. There are two possible scenarios regarding the public disclosure of some 3,600 e-mail messages from the archives of the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in England.
1. The e-mails were stolen by a hacker and published for the purpose of undermining the hypotheses, postulates, a priori assertions, assumptions and beliefs which support the Global Warming Game just as the "effective propaganda machine" claims.
or...
2. The e-mails were leaked to an "effective propaganda machine" by the game player's themselves for the purpose of shifting the "frame of reference" to induce a new public opinion of the game called Global Warming.
You will recognize the first of course as the official story published by the "effective propaganda machine" (the Internet), but that's precisely why we should question it and consider the possibility or probability that the second one may be the real reason.

So why would the game players wish to induce a major shift the public's perspective view of Global Warming?

Among the possible reasons are...:
  1. Global Warming has not achieved the expected result, or has fail to achieve it within the needed time frame. Time is of the essence and it's getting short according to some World Servers of the Plan focused on the Venus Transit and 2012.
  2. Another reason could be related to the sluggish return of sunspot cycle 24 and the predictions of a very weak cycle.
  3. Another possibility could relate to the banking crisis and a collapsing global economy.
  4. Or it could be all of the above.
There are plenty of reasons why Global Warming is no longer justifiable by the game players. It is very probable that Gore's green alliance with venture capital" came as it did in November of 2007 at the very bottom of the last sunspot cycle in order to realize the maximum benefit of the usual warming trend associated with increased sunspot activity as we entered the next cycle. At that time the projected peak of sunspot cycle 24 would fall in mid 2013. That projection has now necessarily been delayed by at least two years: " The sun is in the pits of a century-class solar minimum, and sunspots have been puzzlingly scarce for more than two years.". Adding to that disappointment, is the revised predictions for one of the weakest cycles in memory. With all of that development, we can add the effects of the lingering banking and financial crisis which most certainly poses a serious threat to the budding Green Economy which once held the promise of obscene profits for Gore's Green alliance of venture capitalists. In a Huffington Post article posted by Al Gore on July 17, 2008, he wrote:

"I don't remember a time in our country when so many things seemed to be going so wrong simultaneously. Our economy is in terrible shape and getting worse, gasoline prices are increasing dramatically, and so are electricity rates. Jobs are being outsourced. Home mortgages are in trouble. Banks, automobile companies and other institutions we depend upon are under growing pressure. Distinguished senior business leaders are telling us that this is just the beginning unless we find the courage to make some major changes quickly....
- Al Gore's Progress Report On the Antithesis To the Communitarian Synthesis

In addition to all of those problems, some of the released messages indicate possibly insurmountable problems with the data manipulation/modeling software programs in use by the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. See Congress May Probe Leaked Global Warming E-Mails. Scroll down to the message by Harry Harris.

It's been a long time since we've seen such a well coordinated effort to ditch a failed policy, but I believe the evidence supports that conclusion. I have always believed that the NWO would come on the heels of a rapid succession of catastrophic events which would allow no other options. Events which could be manipulated to focus on the precise time when The Plan is finally realized. Several people whom I consider credible due to their positions in the movement, sincerely believe that the opportune time for the transition will be like a window which will be open for a period of time before it closes, not to open again for thousands of years. According to many of those sources, we are presently within that window of opportunity.

Many believe that the title of the defining document, UN/Local Agenda 21 implies the year 2021 as the latest possible date to have realized the Brave New World. If September 11, 2001 marked the opening of the window (as I believe it does), and 2021 marks the close, then we are approaching the very center where the odds of success are at their maximum. I have documented this window of opportunity on my Gateway To America's Destiny page.

I have updated a page containing some older information on A Major Deception on Global Warming.

Bobby Garner
http://www.congregator.net
Use it if you can.

6 comments:

angry cheese said...

Very clever. Well done! That must be it!
To cause the "experts" and the celebrities (puppet/whores who say anything they are paid well to) to steer the gullible public into doubting Global Warming but then leading us all down the MAN MADE Climate Change road (where it can get COLDER as well as HOTTER - also windy, dry, humid, cloudy, icy, etc.) so they can still blame us, control us and tax us all to hell.
A Paradigm Shift - they're so good at those! I think you are right! I used to think I could spot these manipulations instinctively but you and Bobby are so intelligent, you are miles ahead of me. I could not have worked that out on my own, certainly not within a day or two of them pulling this stunt - you are an amazingly awesome team!
And, of course, with HAARP technology they are going to be able to switch it all on and off at will, anyway.

Bobby Garner said...

Niki, I appreciate your posting of my analysis of Climategate. However, I reject the implication that I am an expert, or that it takes an expert, to understand Game Theory.

Game Theory was introduced by John von Neumann in 1928 as a mathematical concept of strategy in games of chance. If you can play Poker, then you can understand Game Theory. He later applied it to economic behavior. It has since been applied to many other fields of human interest with the apparent strategy being to manipulate and control the activities of ordinary unsuspecting humans. It isn't science, it's a social engineering tool no more complicated than the dialectic.

Game Theory is very much like the consensus method for establishing a "higher truth" where the higher truth is foreknown by the facilitators. The desired outcome of the Game is foreknown by the strategists who play the Game.

I have just outlined a real life example to illustrate how it works.

Historical examples

the tent lady said...

Thanks Bobby, but I didn't even read up on it, like many people and the dialectic, I assumed I couldn't get it so I never bothered to try. You haven't got the fear of topics that most of us do, and that's why your work benefitted me. I guess what i meant to say is your education and experience allows you to study a lot more things than I feel capable of.

No kidding cheese. Our enemies are so devious they are capable of just about anything to achieve their goal. Just like the guy from Hegel's hotel told me in his last comment, I am by default engaged in a Hegelian argument because I oppose the synthesis.

Bobby Garner said...

Niki, you are short changing yourself too much.

Reflect on your statement that my "education and experience" allows me to "study a lot more things."

Isn't it obvious that study comes before education or experience?

angry cheese said...

No, surely Hegel's Hotel is wrong because you do not have an agenda towards which you're trying to steer people - you do not have your own sneaky synthesis to replace their's do you? You just want the Hegelian thing to stop altogether and everyone be open, honest and your (USA's) constitution to be adhered to.
I thought one could only be Hegelian if one had a synthesis in mind, to aim for?
I still haven't grasped this, have I? No wonder nobody has approached me to join Common Purpose, I'm not sneaky enough!

Bobby Garner said...

UPDATE: The public debate concerning Global Warming is over. The new strategy is to move Global Warming to the political arena where votes and influence can be coerced or purchased for a price.

Copenhagen will result in, among other things, new agreements on financing the Green Economy to buy the necessary support and to provide assurances to the financiers.

See new comments at The Global Warming Game No Longer Justifiable.