Thursday, November 6, 2008

Is Obama a Communist or a Communitarian?

Are communism and communitarianism the same thing? No. Why not? Communitarianism combines or "balances" far-right capitalism (fascism) with far-left communism (totalitarianism) to make the "perfect middle;" this is what makes one progressive.

There is ample, verifiable evidence that shows Obama is a communitarian. There is only speculation that his values are communist. There is undeniable PROOF that he follows a program for global "change" called communitarianism. Accusations of communism play directly into the fake dialectical conflicts between the right and the left. Devvy Kidd knows what communitarianism is. She knows it's the solution to the "conflict" between communism and corporate capitalism (also known as market-socialism). She knows feeding the arguments without addressing the solution is b.s. So why does she omit the actual political and legal term that identifies Obamas' politics? Her latest article dissing Obama at "says it all."


S. said...

The book, Union Jack, that Bobby Garner has been referencing lately sheds HUGE amounts of light on this kind of tom foolery.

D. Kidd is not a dupe. She is not naive or stupid. She is an agent of the Right Wing "Spiritual Communits" conspiracy. She plays into the dialectice because she is damned aware of how it is used.

She'll never point out TRUE communitarian values and goals, because she is promoting them. She can't be truthful and secretive at the same time.

She is freind with William Lewis, Joyce Riley, Dave Von Kleist and their ilk.

Little does Devy know that they will devour her the minute they are through with her, or as soon as she steps out of line.

Matthew D. Jarvie said...

What S said is pretty much spot on. I have been reading Devvy's articles for years on NewsWithViews, and while I like her writing style, she does seem to be feeding into the dialectic by giving only half-truths that align with the Christian conservative "patriot" image she is trying to uphold for her readers. If Devvy was to start talking about communitarianism, she would have to basically admit that she was wrong for all these years. So I think it's a matter of ego, personally. I feel she believes she has a certain image to maintain in order to remain relevant to her target audience in the pay-triot movement. They love playing into the dialectic. Unfortunately, with Devvy doing this, she is only providing her audience with half the picture. That is what has always bothered me about her articles. There is no way she can be that naive. It's the same type of thing I see coming from the Ron Paul crowd.

"Communist" is such a loaded term that creates an immediate reaction in people, and I think that's why many in the "patriot" movement want to continue using these inaccurately applied terms which even the corporate media is content throwing around. It's all about pandering to a certain group of people who are so used to these words, never even thinking about what they really mean. Communism is controlled by the same people that gave us capitalism, to play off each other for a purpose. One could not exist without the other.

Here's the thing, whether a president is communist, socialist, communitarian or whatever, they all read off the same script and answer to the same people at the top. I don't see how Obama is any more of a communitarian, or "communist" than Bush, since these people are frontmen and have no say in anything anyway. Both answer to the same puppetmasters and do exactly as they're told from on high. So it would be more accurate to say that the people who control Obama are communitarians, as Obama is simply the mouthpiece who has been groomed by these psychopaths. Manchurian candidates do not have their own beliefs. Their beliefs are their controllers' beliefs.

So what I am saying is that Obama is no more of a "communist" than the people controlling him. Why does Devvy not at least explain that to her readers, instead of feeding into the left/right paradigm the media works tirelessly to maintain, precisely with the intent of keeping people trapped within the dialectic and thinking inside of the box.

Bobby Garner said...

"I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth, if it be such as would obliged them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives." - Russian author, Leo Tolstoy

I believe that perfectly describes most of the well known writers. There is a natural desire to be heard. After all, that is the purpose. The problem is that this desire easily overrides, suppresses, or causes ignorance of common sense.

"Common sense is very uncommon. Common sense is in spite of, not as a result of education. Common sense is instinct, and enough is genius. Nothing is more fairly distributed than common sense: no one thinks he need more of it than he already has. Common sense is the knack of seeing things as they are, and doing things as they ought to be done." - Rudyard Kipling

Common sense has no intrinsic knowledge or understanding of its own. It acts as a prompt to acquire the appropriate knowledge, to understand it correctly, and to make wise application to a particular problem. Now. What do we do in view of the evidence that this crucial function has broken down? My research clearly shows that the key words which explain the phenomenon in the order of its progression are: complaisance, complicity, deception, ignorance, stupidity and foolishness. These are the ingredients of the classical tragedy which repeats over and over again and fills the annuls of our history.

Matthew D. Jarvie said...

I e-mailed Devvy last night to ask her why she refers to Obama as a communist and not a communitarian, and this is the response I received today:

The communitarian doctrine is communist morality. I've been writing about
communitarianism for years and have made it a major study. Most people just
yawn because they're so under educated and dumbed down from the
government's indoctrination centers they call schools, they are little
better than cattle to the prod.

Obama is a dirty Red. He was raised by an atheist. His father eventually
became an atheist. Obama was mentored by commies in Hawaii and then took up
with them in Chicago. I have read the several hundred pages investigation
by crack investigative reporter Cliff Kincaid. I have linked those reports
in my columns and sent them off to the FBI with my other paperwork on



S. said...

...instead of sending stuff off to the FBI, Devy should just file it right there by her desk... or even on her hardrive. After all... If you work FOR someone, you don't have to send things TOO them...

Do you?

Bobby Garner said...

Devvy is acknowledging that people don't want to hear the truth. It isn't popular and she would never be able to make a living off of it. So, she dilutes it down to a level that has broader appeal among the idiots.

Its the modern adaptation of the Court Jester.