Showing posts with label smart grid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label smart grid. Show all posts

Friday, February 11, 2011

"No Labels" Campaign is the Third Way, by Rosa Koire

No surprise to see Indiana Senator Evan Bayh was part of the start-up committee for No Labels. His ties to the Third Way are direct; Bayh was the leader of the Third Way bipartisan group in the Senate. I used to have a page at the ACL called "Bayhwatch." Following Bayh is how I first heard of Obama.

Read the Label, The new political group No Labels shows why labels exist
"Everything you need to know about the new political group No Labels is contained in its slogan: "Not Left. Not Right. Forward." It's smug. It sounds like an Obama campaign catchphrase. And it ignores the whole reason politics exists, which is that not everyone agrees on what "Forward" is. " By Christopher Beam, Monday, Dec. 13, 2010 http://www.slate.com/id/2277783/

From Rosa Koire:
You may have heard about the No Labels campaign. It's a new political movement, a sort of counter to the Tea Party for those on the left or more left-leaning. No Labels. Not Republicans, Not Democrats, Not Independents. No label.

Ok, we took a look.

They're Communitarians.
Another term for this is the Third Way.

The enlightened compromise. The civilized synthesis. The educated answer is consensus, they say. This is the heart of Communitarianism. Why? Communitarianism is the 'balancing of the individual's rights against those of the community.' In the US Constitution we are guaranteed rights that we were born with: life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. That last one, as you know, was to be 'property.' Property is not just land. YOU are your own property. That was an element of fundamental freedom.

So how can you 'balance' those rights with those of the community? The community has no rights under the US Constitution. Individuals have rights and responsibilities, but the community as a whole, what is that? The collective? Whenever you 'balance' or subsume, or subordinate, or consensus-ize the individuals' rights you'll get something different from what we are guaranteed under the Constitution.


Here's an example.
Let's take two glasses and set them on a table.
One glass is full of water. Let's call it a Republic.
The other glass is full of milk. Let's call it a Communitarian state.


Now we'll get a glass pitcher and set it on the table.

Let's balance the water with the milk by pouring them both into the pitcher.


What do you have?
It's not water anymore, is it?
It's milk. Watery milk. But milk. Not water.


The Third Way.

Communitarianism. Balancing your individual rights with the 'rights' of the community. This is being pitched to you as the new enlightened form of political discourse. You are 'selfish' if you insist on your individual rights and freedoms. This is the justification for Agenda 21-Sustainable Development. For the good of the planet. For everyone's security. For your health. To protect your children. To limit workplace violence. To stop bullying.

All of these things are laudable, but somehow they always result in more restrictive laws that affect everyone. They criminalize everyone. In our town, the Civil Code has been criminalized. What does that mean? If you don't mow your lawn it's a misdemeanor.

Will your child have a criminal record if he calls another kid a 'queer?' Will you be held responsible if your employee shoots someone and you knew he was upset over a breakup with his wife? Will your 15 year old daughter be strip-searched at the airport? Will you lose custody of your 10 year old because he is obese? Will you be evicted from your apartment because you smoked on your balcony in violation of a local ordinance? Will you be taxed for driving 15 miles to work instead of riding your bike? Will you be fined for watering your vegetable garden? Will your Smart Meter be used to tell advertisers what to sell you? Will your Smart vehicle with remote shut off capability be shut down by someone in your State capitol while you're driving? Will your neighbor report you to the Community Oriented Policing Unit of your local PD because you seemed to be acting strangely? Your rights have been balanced.

That was easy, wasn't it? No Labels. Why not? Maybe they don't have the guts to say what their label should be. Or maybe they figure you'll never guess.

For more on this please look at the list on the right side of this page and click on 'Communitarianism'.

--
GET INVOLVED---IT'S YOUR CITY!

Santa Rosa Neighborhood Coalition
www.SantaRosaNeighborhoodCoalition.com

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Join the "Quiet Revolution"

Join the "Quiet Revolution"
by Niki Raapana
March 21,2009

We sure hear a lot of talk about revolution these days. There's the Ron Paul Revolution, the Revolution Against Evolution, the Revolution of Change, the Internet Revolution, the Carbon Revolution, the Green Revolution, the Obama Revolution, the Alex Jones Revolution Against the New World Order, and the Jesus Revolution. It's too bad we don't hear more about the Quiet Revolution. This is the global-to-local policing revolution, and it's getting quietly stronger every day.
"In the U.S. community policing originated as a "quiet revolution" seeking recognition in the 70s (Kelling, 1988; Greene, 1989) and has since become a tour de force to be reckoned with in the 90s. (Bayley and Sheering, 1997; Rosenbaum, 1994; Cordner, 1989). " Community Policing in China: Continuity and Change, by Kam C. Wong, 2000 http://www.polizei-newsletter.de/documents/Community_PolicinginChWong.pdf.
The tactics for the new paradigm shift in domestic policing began in urban ghettos and HUD projects in the 70s. HUD employees wrote and published The Broken Window Theory. It was used by the community cops to test "innovative strategies of enforcement." Part of HUD's untested theory was that poor neighborhoods and the people in them are the cause of "full blown fear." According to Kelling, this happens when there are old houses and unlit streets and yards, which creates an atmosphere of "feeling that nobody's in charge and nobody cares."

"There are at least two areas where the federal government can and should act to promote security in inner city neighborhoods: (1) Community Policing for inner city residents (2) Drug treatment for inner city offenders." The Essential Communitarian Reader, by Amitai Etzioni, 1998.
The new strategy was to build federal partnerships with communities and look for innovative ways to solve neighborhood problems. This became known as POP, or Problem Oriented Policing. Officers were trained in a formula called SARA (Scanning, Assessment, Response, Analysis). The first step in any POP investigation was to "scan" the neighborhood and identify all the possible players associated with the potential problem. The police went door-to-door doing Knock-and-Talks, asking residents to identify any suspicious acting people in their neighborhoods. This information was programmed into a GIS (Geographical Information System) database. Once the identified target citizen's data was in their computers, the GIS could do more than just tell city electric workers where the cables were buried. The advanced GIS performs Potential for Crime Analysis in Identified Hot Spots.
"When Professor Herman Goldstein of the University of Wisconsin Law School developed the concept of problem-oriented policing (also known as community policing and neighborhood policing), he must have envisioned what an important role this theory would have on the future of police work. Professor Goldstein’s theory is based mostly on what seems to be a common-sense way of approaching crime problems in the community, that is, to address the problems that cause or encourage criminal activity not merely to enforce the laws that prohibit such activities. At the heart of every community-oriented policing program is this concept." http://ruralhall.govoffice.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={DAA95C90-AB37-4604-9330-0605CA8B7BD9}
Based on the data analysis, community oriented police would plan a response to the potential threat. Many a home was purchased for well under market value after problem homeowners identified by their neighbors as "noisy, probably an drug dealer and/or a prostitute, with dirty kids" were happy to move out of the neighborhood. They became known as "willing sellers." The final stage of SARA was to analyze the effects of the citizen driven response and share that data with other comunity police around the world.
"Community Safety and LA21: 8.6 Just as a fair and equitable society is essential for a sustainable future, so too is an environment in which people are free from crime and the fear of crime. Since 1993, a highly localised multi-agency Community Safety Partnership - involving the Council, Police, Probation Service, voluntary sector and the local business community - has been working to combat crime, vandalism and anti-social behaviour in the Borough. The effectiveness of this approach and the broad range of crime prevention measures implemented as part of the Community Safety Strategy have helped to make Tameside a safer place for the whole community. Community Safety Plan: 8.7 In preparing the Community Safety Plan for Tameside required by Government during 1998, the Partnership recognises that crime prevention initiatives must be complemented with actions aimed at changing attitudes and behaviour, if there is to be a lasting reduction in the levels of crime and anti-social behaviour." http://www.tameside.gov.uk/la21/poverty
The official federal Office of Community Oriented Policng Services (COPS) was established in 1994, authorized under the Violent Crime Act. Clinton gave it the big "push." Over the next several years 100,000 COPS were hired in cities and towns across America. At the same time, Community Policing was introduced in the UK, South Africa, and across the globe. (A year later the Domestic Violence Act was introduced across the world in much the same pattern, in GB and the US on the same day, and expanded on the POP philosophy).

The political idology behind community policing is called The Third Way. The Third Way is a synthesis of the right and the left that originated from Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, Lynn Forrester (later de Rothschild), Michael Steinheart and Al From. Bill Clinton was the first candidate chosen by the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) to run for US president. Tony Blair, Clinton's buddy from Oxford, was the Third Way candidate in Great Britian. When Clinton and Blair won, the New Democratic Movement transcended the right v left conflict and reinvented the world.

"New Democrat policies transcend the stale left-right debate and define a Third Way for governing based on progressive ideas, mainstream values, and innovative solutions that reflect changing times. New Democrat ideas that have become law include national service, work-based welfare reform, charter schools, community policing, an expanded earned-income tax credit, and market incentives for environmental protection." Overview | June 1, 1998, About The New Democrat Movement http://www.ndol.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=85&subid=109&contentid=894
The PPI (Progressive Policy Institute) is the think tank for the Third Way Democrats. (Their website used to say their purpose was "to define the ultimate Third Way.")

"PPI has long promoted innovative strategies for preventing crime. For example, its work in the early '90s inspired the Clinton Administration's "100,000 cops" initiative as well as its support for community-oriented policing. Building on this foundation, PPI has launched the Community Crime Fighting Project aimed at identifying and promoting the next generation of crime-fighting ideas and technologies. The Project works to develop a Third Way on crime and public safety that transcends the right's singular focus on punishing crime through maximum incarceration and the left's fixation on more social spending to address the "root causes" of crime. The new approach instead envisions refocusing every part of the criminal justice system
on empowering communities to take charge of their own self-defense." PPI | Project Description | June 29, 2000, About PPI's Community Crime Fighting Project
http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=119&subsecID=202&contentID=602
In Seattle, the man who introduced Community Policing was a former officer from San Diego, Norm Stamper (the Chief retired after losing the November 1999 WTO Battle of Seattle). Throughout the 1990s, the City of Seattle created numerous new agencies to handle the new development objectives. One of these was called the Department of Neighborhoods, directed by Jim Diers*. In the spring of 1999, the City of Seattle began working with COPS to write sustainable development visions for all 37 neighborhoods. Planning groups followed the guidelines laid out in the WA State Growth Management Act of 1990 combined with suggestions recommended at the 1992 Earth Summit and advisors from COPS.

"Linking anti-crime efforts with economic revitalization activities in high-crime neighborhoods, addressing the single greatest impediment to private-sector investment while providing economic opportunities for at-risk populations." PPI | Project Description | June 29, 2000, About PPI's Community Crime Fighting Project http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=119&subsecID=202&contentID=602
The blueprint for restructuring the world and global economic revitalization is called UN Local Agenda 21. This plan calls for a complete reorganization of local government based on expanded data gathering and mapping plans, using multi GIS information layers requiring clearances where personally identifiable facts or gossip is stored (called anecdotal data).

Adhering to the successful SARA model, City inspectors began ticketing homeowners for violations of Local Agenda 21 land use regulations. Since Safe and Affordable Housing is a UN Human Right, all housing must be regularly inspected for code violations. Thousands of Seattle residents refused to invite the inspectors inside their homes. Unable to gain entrance to so many homes without a valid warrant, and thus unable to complete their interior safety inspections, the City planned other innovative ways to gain access to the insides of private dwellings. In a memo to Seattle neighborhood groups in 1998, SPD Chief Stamper called the 4th Amendment requirements for a legal search warrant "an identified barrier to the program."

Chief Stamper was replaced by Chief Gil Kerlikowske in early 2000. Prior to joining the Seattle Police force, Kerlikowske was Director of Grants for Community Oriented Policing Services in DC. While there he helped create an innovative way to expand the GIS database using a program called COMPASS.

"One of the core elements of the COMPASS initiative is the creation of a data infrastructure which contains information from a variety of sources. These data will include extant social indicator data (e.g., employment statistics; housing information; land use data; school data; hospital records; asset mapping) and a host of safety information (e.g., incident-based crime data; arrest statistics; calls for service; court and corrections data; victimization surveys; and fear of crime data)." http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/
In June 2000, John (Jody) Kretzman was the guest speaker at Seattle's Town Hall. He introduced local neighborhood group leaders to an alternative approach to mapping neighborhoods. His program was called ABCD (Asset Based Community Development). He said the focus had changed from identifying problems to identifying assets, which he assured the room was a much more positive approach to rebuilding community. His books included "Mapping and Mobilizing Community Capacity" which suggests an 11 page interview of all residents. Working with concerned neighborhood volunteers, the COPS could go door to door asking people to help save the community by answering all the questions about their skills and abilities.

Professor Jody Kretzmann, Co-director of the Asset Based Community Development Institute at Northwestern University was later to become a member of Senator Obama's Urban Policy Committee http://www.abc.net.au/rn/lifematters/stories/2008/2438655.htm (Michele Obama is listed as Domestic Faculty at ABCD http://www.sesp.northwestern.edu/abcd/faculty/) His Co-Director at ABCD, John McNight was one of the men who trained Barack Obama to identify and organize community assets. He also signed Obama's Harvard Law School application. (See: John McNight - My Student Barack Obama (82,83,84), http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buTGLg_c304)

Another PPI recommendation to the federal expansion of community policing was the creation of Fusion Centers.
"2. Creating a national-level intelligence fusion center within the Department of Homeland Security as a complement to the National Counterterrorism Center" PPI | Policy Report | September 12, 2008, Getting Intelligence Reform Right By Jim Arkedis.
There is a lot of attention being paid to Fusion Centers now. A Missouri cop leaked Fusionst documents to someone on Alex Jones' staff. The report has since been verified and admitted to by the Missouri State Police. The analysts' report, based on COMPASS data, predicts the followers of presidential candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin have a potential for domestic terrorism. This revelation, along with the Child Safety Act, the proposed Gun Registration regulations, and Monsantos' proposed Food Safety Act has many registered Independents, Libertarians, Republicans, Constitutionalists and even Democrats talking openly about an inveitable coming civil war against the feds.

Obama's new Drug Czar, not only the creator of COMPASS and a founding Director overseeing millions in initial COPS hiring and training grants, is an expert in fusion centers. He explained Fusion Centers in his statement before the UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY’S SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE, INFORMATION SHARING,AND TERRORISM RISK ASSESSMENT REGARDING BUILDING A PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY: IMPROVING INFORMATION SHARING WITH STATE & LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR, MAY 25, 2007, 1:00 PM BELLEVUE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, BELLEVUE, WA:

"And we are in the process of designing and implementing a regional fusion center which seeks to integrate, to the greatest extent possible, private sector participation. The City of Seattle and the Puget Sound region – like many communities across the nation – has the capacity to transform our time-tested, profound personal relationships within the private sector into a system and structure of regular information sharing. So in thinking about the potential for public-private intelligence sharing, I believe it is not so much a matter of will as a matter of structure and design, and of overcoming impediments that frustrate our shared commitment to collaborate. The real key to this transformation, however, consists of law enforcement consciously and purposefully broadening its engagement with the private sector, much in the same way we have asked DHS to expand the scope of their engagement and partnership with local law enforcement."
COPS, like every other program coming down via the UN Declaration at Rio, is based in the theory of communitarianism. Promoted as the sensible solution to the conflicts posed by too many individual rights and not enough community rights, Communitarians insist there must be a new effort to "shore up the moral, social and political environment." They "balance" the rights of individuals against the helath and safety of the community at large. Amitai Etzioni has told us numerous times that individual rights can only be protected by taking some away.

The founder of the Communitarian Network was praised by both Bill and Hillary Clinton as an inspiration and for helping to achieve a new communitarian vision for the country. (Bill Clinton told Americans about the communitarian ideology twice during the latter part of Obama's campaign; Hillary accused Iowans of not being communitarian enough.))

The communitarian Third Way and it's theory of Reinvented Government has yet to prove itself as a superior theory to the founding American legal (and proven successful) principles for protecting individuals from the community. It has, on the other hand, proven itself to be a potential problem of global proportions. One can only imagine what kinds of crimes COMPASS would predict if we put in the data about the COPS.

"But there's little evidence COPS has worked, and there's some evidence it has actually encouraged police tactics completely at odds with the objectives of community policing. A 2005 report by the Government Accountability Office concluded that the program may have contributed to a minor reduction in crime—a little more than 1 percent—but at a cost of $8 billion. A peer-reviewed study in the journal Criminology concluded that COPS "had little to no effect on crime."

"The main problem with federal block grants is that once they're issued, Congress can't monitor them to be sure they're spent properly. And that's certainly true of COPS. A 2000 report by the Madison Times, for example, found that COPS grants, along with a federal program through which local police departments obtain surplus military equipment from the Pentagon, led to a mass expansion of SWAT teams throughout Wisconsin in the 1990s. SWAT teams popped up in absurdly small communities like Forest County (population 9,950),
Mukwonago (7,519), and Rice Lake (8,320).

"And not just in Wisconsin. In a survey conducted by criminologist Peter Kraska, two-thirds of responding police chiefs said SWAT teams and paramilitary tactics "play an important role in community policing strategies."" Bad Cop: Why Obama is getting criminal justice policy wrong. By Radley Balko Posted Monday, Oct. 6, 2008, at 3:57 PM ET http://www.slate.com/id/2201632/pagenum/all/#p2
Former Seattle Police chief Norm Stamper explains the neeed to restructure policing in his book, Breaking Rank:

""The paramilitary bureaucracy" of police departments, Stamper writes, "is a slow-footed, buck-passing, blame-laying, bullying, bigotry-fostering institutional arrangement, as constipated by tradition and as resistant to change as Mel Gibson's version of the Catholic Church. I cannot imagine other essential reforms in policing – improved crime-fighting, safety and morale of the force, the honoring of constitutional guarantees – without significant structural transformation." Italics his." Seeing Red, Former SDPD officer Norm Stamper's memoir, Breaking Rank' is an angry eye-opener about police culture, Reviewed by Neal Matthews, May 29, 2005 http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050529/news_lz1v29rank.html

Obama is a Third Way politician (Etzioni: “no philosophy that better describes Obama’s position than communitarianism” http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=1751), and he fully supports the 1 billion in COPS funding that was recently inserted into the federal Stimulus Bill:
On March 11th, President Obama signed into law the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, which provides funding this year for the COPS Office. This funding is in addition to the $1 billion that was recently appropriated for the COPS Hiring Recovery Program (CHRP) under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. In total, COPS received $550 million for FY 2009. This includes funding for Community Policing Development, Indian Country, Methamphetamine, Law Enforcement Technology, Secure Our Schools, and Child Sexual Predator Elimination."
(The above numbers don't make any sense to me, but I'm not very good at math, so maybe I just can't see how the COPS got extra funding in addition to 1 billion and their total for 2009 is 550 million, because I'm too stupid. ) Smart Grid, also in the Stimulus Bill, is another COMPASS database program.

In November, 2002 writer Doug Thompson expressed his concern over the creation of the DHS in Capitol Hill Blue, Welcome to the American Gestapo:

"Some may argue the current terrorist threat requires such drastic measures. But what happens when that threat is met? The Department of Homeland Security and its draconian powers will still exist. Who will determine the new threat? Who will decide who becomes the enemy? "An evil exists that threatens every man, woman and child of this great nation," the leader of another country once wrote. "We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland." That was Adoph Hitler, writing about creation of the Gestapo in Nazi
Germany."

I know why so many Americans and British, Canadians and Australians I know fear for the fate of our nations. I have regular readers at this blog from Argentina to Romania. But Alex Jone's Police State is not inevitable, not here. Unlike the German people who had no role in the actions taken by the Gestapo (other than as snitches and informants), the American people are "partners" with the DHS. We don't need to take up arms against our reinvented community police. The reinvented police claim we work with them, and our law says they work for us. So let's get to work. Americans don't need to stand outside meetings with signs "protesting" the agenda. We are the sovereign rulers here, and we have every right to attend any government planning meetings we choose. Once we establish our presence and gain the respect and support of our real communities, we can seize power and change the community policing agenda. Once we control the police we can start arresting the criminals involved in sustaianable development.

We too can adopt Obama's methods for community organizing and start taking back our communities, one police station at a time.

"THE COMMUNITY POLICING ADVISORY COUNCIL: The advisory council is composed of community leaders representing many different segments of the population. This group meets monthly with the Chief of Police and occasionally other staff members, to provide unfiltered input from the community to police management. This direct interaction between the police and the community facilitates the building of partnerships and provides a community perspective on department policy and procedures." http://www.ci.santa-maria.ca.us/40453.html
++++
Notes:
* "Galluzzo (Director of the Gamiel Foundation) trained college-grad Diers in how to organize a fractious community. They formed SESCO, the South End Seattle Community Organization. It was a powerhouse, one of the most successful neighborhood groups in city history. It killed the incinerator.Diers went on to head Seattle’s Department of Neighborhoods and write a book on bottom-up organizing, called “Neighbor Power.” (Jim Diers also served on the Urban Policy Committee for Barack Obama’s campaign) Galluzzo stayed in Seattle for four years, then moved to Chicago. Not long after, he trained another raw college grad looking for a purpose, named Barack Obama." http://whitecenternow.com/2008/11/24/jim-diers-of-west-seattle-and-white-center-advising-obama-on-urban-affairs/
How many Americans have read Obama's Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel's book:

"The only truly outlandish part of their platform is a call for "universal citizen service" in the style of a state like Israel, in which all 18-year-olds would be required to perform a few months of community service and learn some "disaster preparedness" skills. Seems like a good idea, but good luck convincing the public that it’s not a draft." The Harvard Crimson review, http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=514865. THE PLAN, Big Ideas for Change in America, RAHM EMANUEL AND BRUCE REED http://www.publicaffairsbooks.com/publicaffairsbooks-cgi-bin/display?book=9781586484125

Monday, March 2, 2009

GE - Plug into the Smart Grid

This was an ad on youtube, supposed to have a hologram but i don't have javascript enabled so I can't see it. http://ge.ecomagination.com/smartgrid/?c_id=youtube#/augmented_reality

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Animal Identification tags to destroy small family farms

From Peter Myers' elist:
(3) Animal Identification tags to destroy small family farms

From: Jacob G. Stansbury, Jr. <damor1@cox.net> Date: 23.02.2009 05:30 PM

http://www.govtrack .us/congress/ bill.xpd? bill=s111- 425
S. 425:
111st Congress

2009-2010
A bill to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for the establishment of a...

A bill to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for the establishment of a traceability system for food, to amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act, the Poultry Products Inspections Act, the Egg Products Inspection Act, and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for improved public health and food safety through enhanced enforcement, and for other purposes.

Other purposes?---

Lots more at:
http://www.opednews .com/articles/ Monsanto- bills-being- rushe-by- Linn-Cohen- Cole-090217- 758.html

... I have written here many times about NAIS and now the Obama government, having promised people would have 60 days to comment, having promised transparency, having promised it was in support of small farmers, is pushing through as rapidly as humanly possible, bills that will mean the end of organic farming.

How? By Monsanto entering into the body of organic farming like a disease and morphing organic farms into industrial facilities, the farmer being forced to "treat" the land with chemicals and the animals with drugs, trapped into paying for what is unwanted, unsafe, unneeded, unconstitutional.

This is monopoly at the most extreme degree - not just unfair competition but total control of every aspect of the competition to the degree of making them laborers for the monopoly.

Here is the senate version.

http://www.govtrack .us/congress/ bill.xpd? bill=s111- 425

The bill has been referred to the following committees:

Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. Sent to committee on February 9, 2009 we are not allowed to know what happens in committee. For some reason these things are secret and we can't most times even know how anyone voted. As this site points out, if you do not have a rep or senator on the committeesâ??â??.they don't' want to hear from you.

In the House: http://www.govtrack .us/congress/ bill.xpd? bill=h111- 875

A bill in the US Congress: To establish the Food Safety Administration within the Department of Health and Human Services to protect the public health.

Referred to committee on February 4, 2009

House Energy and Commerce

House Agriculture

The bills in both the House and Senate are virtually identical. This means this whole deal was decided at the same time Smart Grid was inserted into the Stimulus Package. The house and Senate bills will lay the groundwork for NAIS and other programs, and Smart Grid will make them operable. ...

This is all part of the Smart Grid System of controlling everything in our lives and us â?“ to me it is the Patriot Act gone ballistic, digitizing every aspect of our lives and leaving no area of privacy or true freedom whatsoever. Do people even remember anymore how different life used to be, how it belonged to us and only us?

Found here: http://rfdamerica. com/?p=333

Last paragraph.

One of the largest components of Smart Grid is already being implemented by the USDA; it's called the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) it requires farmers to implant a RFID tag into the body of all of their livestockâ?“cows, pigs, goats, chickens, sheep, all livestock. The NAIS threatens to destroy small-scale family farms. If you're not familiar with the NAIS, here are a couple of resources: Downsize DC, NAIS: Too little too late? and NAIS: Let's do some fuzzy math. Coupled with Smart Grid, the NAIS strengthens the ability of Government officials to control rural Americans as completely as they control people in the cities. ...
For more information on NAIS go to NAIS Info Central.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Quitting is not an option?

Read the CNN transcript of Obama's Speech to Congress. The Obama administration has every intention of fulfilling America's 2020 vision for a communitarian future. In a communitarian , faith based society, every individual is regulated like an "asset." Also often called Capacity Building, all Americans are to be tested and trained for their new jobs. Read that again if you have to. I said ALL Americans, not just our youth.

This is not an optional program; the communitarians do not allow any individuals to choose to not participate. Our skills and abilities are directly tied into all the other communitarian programs (via COMPASS), and which jobs we're qualified to perform determines which housing we are assigned to. Volunteerism is rewarded with further communitarian classes and indoctrination, which will lead to financial security.
"So tonight I ask every American to commit to at least one year or more of higher education or career training. This can be a community college or a four-year school, vocational training or an apprenticeship. But whatever the training may be, every American will need to get more than a high school diploma.

"And dropping out of high school is no longer an option. It's not just quitting on yourself; it's quitting on your country. And
this country needs and values the talents of every American.

"That's why -- that's why we will support -- we will provide the support necessary for all young Americans to complete college and meet a new goal: By 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world. That is a goal we can meet." {boldface added} Obama's speech to the US Congress http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/24/sotn.obama.transcript/
Not one word about H.R. 45 in Obama's speech (thanks Kathy!), but Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/show could be a big help to his "every American" has to let the communitarians invade their homes, to inspect, to regulate, to monitor, to help, to assess values, to mentally and physically test the inhabitants, and to make them all go back to school or get treatment.

Our new president says "dropping out of high school is no longer an option." Is there new legislation that will provide the enforcement for this closed option? And come on, I'm a high school dropout and a college dropout. What if the ONLY reason I was able to understand Obama's communitarian synthesis is because I left the public indoctrination centers? If college makes us all so damn smart, then where's all the grads, MAs and Ph.D.s who can comprehend my writings or be so educated they've challenged our original thesis? (2 more School Review Boards answered the Hegel poll.) How come I have to dumb down my articles about the communitarian legal system to a fifth grade level if colleges are teaching people such valuable knowledge? What the hell are our schools teaching us beyond the fifth grade?

Do fifth graders know what a "new rendezvous with America's progressive tradition" is?
"Tuesday night's speech was the most comprehensive manifesto he has offered yet for his new rendezvous with America's progressive tradition." EJ Dione, Washington Post Op Ed
There's so many issues coming at us now it's a serious mindbender trying to keep up with every new regulation that will bring us, transformed, into 2020: Our Common Destiny. The war against American freedom is exploding in our backyards. Battles rage across the nation, every area has its own distress signals going out. Some of these battles are openly, extremely violent (as on Mexican border), others are vague, extremely benign and sound very nice to the petty officials doing the attacking. But the cause is the same. The reason for ALL the conflicts, changes and takings is Communitarianism.

But few have a clue, so our people keep running in circles. We're all trying to stop this new bill or that new regulation. We never associate these attacks on our liberty with their source, because many of us stayed in the US public school system.

In a free society, quitting is ALWAYS an option. According to our law, resisting government tyranny is our obligation. People want us to depend on the hunters to safe keep the 2nd. Like my dad always said, guns aren't just for hunting animals.

What if refusing to comply with communitarian regulations was mandatory? If there's going to be a war in this country, let's get our facts straight about who we're fighting. Our common enemy is not only the border invasion from Mexico (which requires our immediate, armed attention). It's not only the Wall Street thugs, the US Cons in the congress or their bosses (the international drug cartel running the whole show). It's not just the Empire builders and the "free" traders who quietly write communitarian trade agreements that establish new regional governments. It's also any LOCAL who forces us to comply with an unconstitutional communitarian law.

America DOES need "the values and talents of every American." As sovereigns, born free under our constitutions, our choice of weapons is optional.

All communitarian funded programs have strings as sticky and deadly as a Black Widow's spiderweb. Here's what our guru has to say about the strings in the Stimulus Bill, as quoted by jcwinnie, a blogger who seems to have an exceptional and "correct" grasp of what Obama means by change (wonder where he went to school?):
“Public works” may indeed be needed, but let’s make those green ones, too. For instance, just granting money to states and localities will not do; strings should be attached ensuring that funds will be dedicated to green infrastructure and not to favorite projects that serve the automobile.

The list is not difficult to draw: Buses and passenger vans should be on the green list, not cars. Hence no funds for highways, roads, and bridges unless they first set aside bicycle lanes and diamond lanes for public transportation. Funds for light rails are green. The same is true for new sources of energy, domestically generated, and for fixing our antiquated electrical grid. Not so for loans to nowhere for auto makers. http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=4100
Etzioni has no difficulty with drawing the list because he wrote it. This Stimulus package will cement Etzioni's communitarian control over Americans. Show me ONE out of work American who won't go along with the required compliance for using these funds. Etzioni knows full well what it means to fix "our antiquated electrical grid" because his followers designed the GIS database layers to house the expanded grid information. Light link rail development was how I was introduced to Etzioni's ideas for a new communitarian government in Seattle in 1999. It's the biggest scam so far. But light link rail will pale in comparison to what they can accomplish with the Smart Grid. If you only look at Smart Grid and all the new ID programs together, as one, you have a pretty good picture of what 2020 will look like.

From the above very well informed source we get Al Gore's take on Obama's Science team:
"While this is an amazing group of public servants, we must recognize that there is still a very difficult challenge awaiting us before we can pass new laws that truly solve the climate crisis. Public support for doing the right thing is more crucial now than it ever has been."
Americans doing the right thing IS more crucial now, but unfortunately, Americans don't know what the right thing is anymore. Our public educations made sure of it.

And as for obtaining "justice" in the new communitarian system, as in pleading innocence or demanding due process procedures under US law, well don't get yourself in a tizzy over that America. Susan Coble, our Citizen Service Bureau rep and "liason" to Seattle Mayor Paul Schell's office (the hub of Seattle's light link rail plans), assured me at the 8/30/99 DON-NATS R&B meeting on Seattle's Revised Noise Ordinance that, "Only guilty people will get these tickets."

This next few months should prove to be a real test of my character. Every day somebody I know tries to get me to apply for some government grant or NGO funding. I've been barely making it out here these last couple months, and now the state is all abuzz with the gas line preparations and road construction jobs. The ACL may be the only "organization" (besides the NRA) studying them from a strictly legal standpoint and working full time to expose the Communitarian Justice System to the free world. I'm precariously hungry. If I succumb to the lure of federally funded jobs (that pay Davis Bacon wages!), or the even greater lure of marketing gertee to the pipeline, I will no longer have the time to maintain the ACL website or this blog. As most of my family and friends know, I've never been very good at fund raising for the ACL. Now the donations and book sales are getting fewer and farther between. I guess that's just the way it goes, and obviously I never started the ACL thinking it would pay me anyway! For ten whole years I've believed it was my duty to make this sacrifice for our freedom. I still believe it, but it's harder and harder to stay strong in this belief without adequate supplies. Nordica needs help paying the printer and keeping the ACL business end alive. My writing doesn't seem to help her at all. And it's probably just as true that it won't help America either.

My little army of one is going to be an army of none. Resistance is futile, eh?

Friday, February 20, 2009

Smart Grids versus Stupid People... like us?

"What’s really needed are agents for change."
Tendril's CEO, Adrian Tuck, 2/18/09

This came today from Gisela at Alaskans against the NAIS: http://rfdamerica.com/?p=333 The Smart Grid sure ties into other mapping programs designed to get people to modify their behaviors, doesn't it? What is googles' "investment" in the grid?

A Startup Joins Google and GE in the Smart Grid Conversation
BY Anya Kamenetz Wed Feb 18, 2009

"Historically smart grid was really looked at from the utilities' side--giving the utility control over things like turning air conditioners down [to conserve energy at peak usage]. That model needs to be flipped on its head—getting consumers information about their consumption is the cornerstone to getting people to understand/control/modify their behavior" {boldface added} http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/anya-kamenetz/green-day/upstart-joins-google-and-ge-smart-grid-conversation

Could it be that needing funds for this Smart Grid program was a factor in the Stimulous Bill? Are the big corporates really playing catchup now, or were they in on the action plan from the beginning?

"U.S. utilities already spend about $20 billion a year on information technology, and as part of the federal stimulus bill, the government plans to spend another $11 billion over the next 20 months to help modernize the national grid. So it's little wonder that everyone from giants like Accenture (ACN) and Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) to hot startups like Silver Spring Networks are angling for a piece of the action." http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_09/b4121046675316.htm

So what will all the eventual applications of the the smart grid be?
"No one has ever looked at a smart grid project built to scale," says Michael Jung, policy director at Silver Spring Networks, which is developing technology to allow networked devices to communicate with each other. "We don't know what all the eventual applications running on the smart grid will be, and thus we don't know how to quantify their costs and benefits." http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/29/electricity-infrastructure-obama-business-energy-0129_smart_grid.html


And again, while the "debate" rages in the USA over whether or not Local Agenda 21 is a "conspiracy," the English create plans openly based in the Rio Declaration: http://www.harrogate.gov.uk/harrogate-1252, http://www.harrogate.gov.uk/immediacy-1258

Think learning new behaviors for home living won't be fun? Can we entice you with prizes? Don't you want to pay to play bingo with your future? No worries mate, these are government sponsored games! They're "free!"
"Energy Efficiency Bingo is a fun game packed with energy efficiency advice, with great prizes on offer.

The Home Energy Conservation Officer can carry out bingo sessions free of charge for community groups who meet during the day.

To request a free bingo session or further information please contact John ward-Campbell, Home Energy Conservation Officer on 01423 556909 or email energy@harrogate.gov.uk"

How will these plans affect people living OFF the grid? Will participation in the smart grid be mandatory? Is there any place left in the world where independent people can immigrate to and create or become part of a non-compliant society? Will the people who refuse to comply be those raggedy, dirty, hairy ape people so often shown to be digging in the dirtballs for food in futuristic scientific films? How WILL people live outside the matrix (which is what the plans are officially called)?

What do the the American Community Survey, the National Animal Identification System, Smart Grid, the National ID, and the Copper River Country Mapping Project ALL have in common? All personally identifiable information is housed in the GIS. The GIS has MANY layers to their data, and it is already used by the federal police in their Community Policing COMPASS program. Among other things, the COPS use the data to identify "hot spots" and problem people."

It's gone so far the COPS have video cameras all over the world. The 1999 Matrix for the Seattle Neighborhood Plans included training citizen spies. In 2000, Seattle hired a "new police chief", Gil Kerlikowske. Kerlikowske was the DC grants director for the new COPS program created by Clinton in 1994 after the Violent Crime Act authorized funding. He also helped design COMPASS. Seattle was a pilot test for gathering personal identification to be added to the COMPASS database. That he was hired to be the new SPD chief, was amazing to me, but it never bothered my Seattle friends and it sure never stopped anyone in the know from supporting Obama. At that time my COPS' R&B File was almost blank. I wonder if it's grown any over the last ten years. http://www.seattle.gov/police/programs/policeacademy/default.htm

And just after I finished this post, I opened an email from my friend Bobby, who says:
In my opinion, the Obama administration IS, or will become the "GAIA Revolution". Here's what Gore says about the "stimulus plan":

I urge this Congress to quickly pass the entirety of President Obama's recovery package. The planned unprecedented and critical investments in four key areas -- energy efficiency, renewables, a unified national energy smart grid, and the move to clean cars -- represent an important down payment and are long overdue. These crucial investments will create millions of new jobs and hasten our economic recovery, while strengthening our national security and beginning to solve the climate crisis. - http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/01/gore_obama_stimulus_good_for_c.html

Gore made plans for he and some cronies to profit from this development back in December of 06 right after the Democratic victory in the mid-term elections:

COUNTING ON INCREASING SUNSPOTS TO 2012: "Gore's Generation Investment Management company and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers aim to use their combination of financial firepower and expertise to help speed up the development of technologies and policies needed for a low carbon economy. Gore in green alliance with venture capital"
- SOME VERY INCONVENIENT NOTES


Bobby

In an earlier email as part of that exchange over Gaia 2012, Bobby wrote (and I absolutely love this Bobby!):

"Whereas the Borg's message was: "We will assimilate you. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated". The new message is: You must ascend. It is self destructive to resist. If you refuse to ascend, we will ascend you for your own development, because we LOVE you so much"." Bobby Garner, Congregator.net