Zionist Communitarian control of the anti-Agenda 21 movement

In 2000, we identified Communitarianism as the legal system supporting Agenda 21. We identified the "guru" of the Communitarian Network, whose own writings tell us he was a terrorist, a soldier and now a planner in the Zionist takeover of British Palestine.  I quickly understood why some Christians would never consider these facts, but I've been trying to understand why so many of the Americans actively opposing Agenda 21 and claiming to be on our "side" avoided discussing Communitarianism and its root philosophy, Zionism, for 13 years. 

I couldn't understand why the Liberty movement took no interest in the Communitarian philosophy either, especially after Washington Post Columnist E.J. said the last battle would be fought between the Libertarians and the Communitarians. When the leaders of the Libertarian Party REFUSED to acknowledge that challenge, told me the word was "too hard" for Americans, I was confused by that. I waited for Ron Paul to say the word just ONCE during his Liberty campaign, and his silence did nothing to alleviate my suspicions that all was not as it seems in the Liberty corner.

It's recently been revealed that Ron Paul's Homeschooling program is connected direcly to  Christian Futurist Dispensationism. This explains to ME why RP, Tom Woods and all the other Von Mises "liberty" economic proponents refused to discuss or debate Communitarianism.

Now it's been revealed that Rosa Koire, who is the only person out their speaking against Agenda 21 who alludes to the term "communitarian" in her speeches (but never fully explains it), is censoring the most relevant FACT about it. On page 31 of her book, Behind the Green Mask, she does a very tricky thing. In the top half of the page she writes, "calling it a Zionist plot is absurd" and the bottom half of the page encourages her readers to "Familiarize yourself with communitarianism."  Rosa learned ALL the facts about Communitarianism when she read both our "excellent books" (her words) about it in 2009, but when she included our research in her book in 2011, she used it on the same page where she negated our research as "absurd." Sure, she cites us in the back somewhere (not on the page where she distorts our original thesis), and she has links to us from her websites, but so what...so does Etzioni and the Communitarian Network.

The war against the slippery Etzioni and his Zioni followers takes many shapes and forms. 

Travel News from msnbc.com

Here's the latest news from the mainstream viewpoint, includes a story about a man with a urostomy bag having a humiliating experience during a TSA pat down, videos, and a list of all the U.S. airports now offering the new enhanced security.

Does anybody else remember how fun it used to be to fly? People had huge parties at the airports, meeting arrivals and seeing people off was normal for Americans. I tended bar at both major Alaskan airports so I know airport bars were our old social hubs, even for people traveling with children. Then the communitarians came along and started regulating Americans' public drinking and smoking and eating and in my opinion, it's all gone straight downhill from there. I believe that when we allowed trained facilitators to tell us what was bad for us and allowed them to press their opinions into law, we gave up our adulthood and became wards of Big Mother. If our neo government has the power to tell us how many drinks we can order in one night, then why would we expect to be able to say we won't pull our pants down if we need a spanking?

Seems like all kinds of horror stories about tsa harassment that happened over the past eight years are being revived for recently planned "opt out" days. I read a new old story every day. Makes me wonder what it would have been like if the Germans and Italians had internet in the 30s and we moderns had all their blogs and facebook pages to study for similarities.

It's kind of weird but I'm getting regular hits on the TSA job post I made of the local craigslist ad for Anchorage Airport TSA testers, from people looking for information about how to apply. Is it ethical for me to trick unsuspecting people into coming to my blog?

TSA pat-down leaves traveler covered in urine
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40291856/ns/travel-news

SNL TSA spoof http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joIxWcFO3bY

Song/video: Don't Touch My Junk (with a blatant pitch for Alex Jones embedded in the script) http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/70298.html

Thanks to Connie for finding these links!

TSA naked body scanners tested on London pubs six years ago

photo posted
By Justin Rohrlich November 5, 2010
American Airlines Pilots Revolt Against the TSA

I do remember the report about the London pub patrons who were rounded up and given the choice between the x ray scans or strip searches in 2004. Of course now the whole story is missing from the internet, (Update: Josef found it here) but it was in a UPI news report and I referenced it somewhere on my ACL website when it happened, probably the Community Policing page. 2004 was when a majority of the ACL was posted online. Maybe one of our English readers remember it happening, but very few Americans noticed it then and I haven't seen any reports about it now that this same "option" is being offered to air travelers in the USA. How long before people will be subjected to this outrageous demand to demean themselves in OTHER places besides airports? My guess is not long.

And seeing this pilot revolt letter I'm sad to realize as a group they are not revolting on behalf of ALL Americans demeaned by this new policy, just for their own group. How typical of the way Americans think nowadays. Separate rights for separate groups is okay if you're in the group that gets to "keep" your God given rights. Nobody was ever supposed to be able to "take" our rights, not from anyone who abides by the legitimate laws.

Now it's "policy" we have to abide by ... not law. .. policy which changes at the whim of the policymaker. Policy that over rules our national law... boy that's some heavy duty policy... don't ya think? Is there any identifiable theoretical policy that would be powerful enough to over rule the U.S. Constitution and ALL 50 state constitutions? Or is this expectation that we submit to this policy based on nothing at all? Is it a conspiracy theory to suggest there is some harmonization of legal values that lies at the basis for our continually evolving security policy?

http://www.discourse.net/archives/2004/03/beyond_weird_scary_mass_xray_searching_in_uk.html