U.S. Integration with the EU, Russia and China

Before there can be a New World Order (NWO) or a global government, all nations have to agree to abide by a global system of justice. The NWO is being introduced as Free Trade agreements between the nations. Regional governance and regulatory bodies like the WTO (World Trade Organization) has been slowly implemented in Fabian fashion throughout the Western world.

In the U.S. we adhere to the emerging integration requirements via trade agreements like CAFTA and NAFTA and the WTO. Regional contracts may in fact negate our status (and I am studying this concept right now, thanks to Todd from WA). At the bottom community level (with the global community existing at the very top) regional communitarian integration is accomplished via subserviant local community and economic development regulations.

The "former" Communist Russia must also adapt to international communitarian law before they can be fully admitted into the global free trade community, while openly communist China already participates (very successfully) in the global free trade community. Apparently the very concept of putting one's nation and home businesses first, or protecting local markets from cheap imports, died with the end of the U.S. Republic. (Shhh... Friedrich List never existed.)

As the following report explains, the transition is painful for local manufacturers and agriculture, even in the Re-Sovietized Union, but it's the "long-term" socio-economic gains that justify the complete and utter destruction of local economies. (And lest we forget, Amitai Etzioni and Mikhail Gorbachev coined the term "socio-economics," together.) Across America small and locally owned businesses and industries have been closed because they cannot "compete" on the emerging "free" global to local market. Overwhelming American support for Wal Mart's Chinese goods have been a big boost to global free trade. While many Americans do seem to notice how quickly locally owned businesses close their doors forever after the "new" corporate stores open, that deosn't stop them from shopping at the new corporate/government stores.

We're paying for the total destruction of our national standard of law. Our taxes already paid for a good portion of the integration, and now we're trading the last of our liberty for cheap toasters.

This just came in from Pete. I haven't read through it all (it's a 26 page pdf file). Notice how important the year 2020 is to the entire "concept." "Russia's 2020 Strategic Goals and the Role of International Integration" http://etresoi.ch/Denis/russia2020strat.pdf

Our little biographical textbook, "2020: Our Common Destiny," explains our biased American view (and Paul Barnes' Canadian Perspective) of the outcome of Free Trade International Integration. We include a brief introduction to the EU and the applicable standards for adapting national systems. To be in full compliance with international communitarian law (supreme) requires a complete "overhaul" of national and state legal standards. http://nord.twu.net/acl/2020.html

Bobby Garner recently joined a law forum and tried to start a discussion on Communitarian Law. Here's what happened:

My first post on the Team Law forum (posted here on congregator.net) which I posted on September 3rd was immediately quarantined by the forum administration. On Thursday September 4th, 2008, in a private message they wrote:

Though we appreciate your participation in our Open Forum, we temporarily moved your recent post to the Secured Admin access only forum. This action was taken due to the length of the post and the fact that Admin will not have a chance to review the document until next week. It also took place because the content might not comply with our Forum Rules or the purpose of our Open Forum, which is: to eliminate e-mail to and from Team Law.

That "next week" and following weeks, nothing happened, but then on the 18th I received the following:

Though we appreciate your participation in our Open Forum, we deleted content form one of your posts. The deletion occurred because the post did not comply with the purpose of our Open Forum,...
Regarding the subject matter of your post:
We addressed it accordingly on our Open Forum system in the post where the content was removed.

The post was moved to the 'Elections' forum. You will notice that the first paragraph and a portion of the first sentence of the second paragraph survived, as did some of the last paragraph. Everything between was deleted, and replaced with their own connective wording. As they explain in the reply:

Your original post was significantly longer and it delved into an interesting point of view regarding Freemasonry, its intentions and the outcomes proposed from their continuing efforts along with those that have molded that path for our country from the beginning.

This reads like an acknowledgment to the truth of my argument, but to steer me away from that conclusion, they continue:

Regardless of our opinion regarding such matters, they remain hypothetical offerings we have heard before that have nothing to do with our work.

My comments about the reality of Communitarian Law are nothing more than a "hypothetical offering" which they have already heard before. If in fact they ever did actually hear of it, the audience was carefully protected from the actual word, since it never before existed on the whole website. I checked. They wrote:

The reason such ideologies exist is people are ignorant of the law... If we had not edited a single word of your post, this would not change. We can do absolutely nothing about such conspiracy theories; even if they were true.

While it may be true that we can do nothing about it, and that is an argument I myself have made, the implication clearly is that this is only a conspiracy theory, which is probably not true. The difference is that I recognize that Communitarianism is already the reality, and not a theory at all. Nevertheless, they "addressed it [the issue] accordingly on our Open Forum system".

Here some more of my "hypothetical offering" posted today:

The Governor's Corner page lists 12 original jurisdiction states which are electing governors. All of these governors are members of the National Governors Association. As such they are part of a network of organizations known as the National Associations of Development Organizations. All 12 original jurisdiction state governors actively participate in the National Governors Association programs.

Other NADO member organizations include:
National Conference of State Legislatures
National League of Cities
U.S. Conference of Mayors
National Association of Local Government
National Association of Counties
National Association of Towns and Townships
National Association of State Budget Officers
National Association of Regional Councils

Who coordinates and directs the activities of the National Association of Development Organizations?

What kinds of development? sustainable, regional, economic,community, urban..., "National Association of Development Organizations provides training, information and representation for regional development organizations in small metropolitan and rural America"

Each of these areas of development comes under the purview of Sustainable Development, which is the UN Agenda 21 program. The various associations of local, regional and national government, write, adopt, promote and enforce the body of Communitarian Law.

How can the mayor of my town make decisions in the interest of my town when he is building consensus with neighboring towns throughout a region, which by design promote the greater good of the region regardless of its effect on my town.

Seeing that the Original Jurisdiction state governors are complicit in this unconstitutional regional governance, how do they distinguish themselves from the corporate governors?

You can read it on the forum if you get there before they delete it, or the can read the entire thread HERE...

Bobby Garner
http://www.congregator.net/
http://apps.congregator.net/Blog/
Free to forward or post.

In America, Communitarian Legal Integration is still a conspiracy theory. How is that possible? Oh that's right, it's illegal here. It can never be openly discussed in front of a nation of individuals whose national and state law forbids globalists plotting to destroy the constitutional basis for ALL American law on U.S. soil.

Thanks to Bobby, Pete and Brian and Trudy for keeping me informed. For all the new people writing me lately asking what they should do now that they know, we just made another new friend who may have some ideas we can ponder. Lainie is a staunch McCain/Palin Republican who can recognise the communitarian vision in Obama. It's a start in the right direction. Welcome to the ACL quest Rev. Lainie!

Rev. L. Dowell, Five-Fold Minister
revldowell-clergywomen@erols.com
http://www.voiceink.blogspot.com

And now for economic and Wall Street news from Peter Myer's elist:

From: IHR News Date: 20.09.2008 04:01 AM

Worst Crisis Since '30s, With No End Yet in Sight
by Jon Hilsenrath, Serena Ng and Damian Paletta
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
The Wall Street Journal

http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-budgeting/article/105785/Worst-Crisis-Since-1930s-With-No-End-Yet-in-Sight

And in keeping with the topic of this post:

From: Sino Economics Date: 18.09.2008 07:48 AM

China paper urges new currency order after "financial tsunami"
Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:45am EDT http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSPEK4365020080917?sp=true

BEIJING (Reuters) - Threatened by a "financial tsunami," the world must consider building a financial order no longer dependent on the United States, a leading Chinese state newspaper said on Wednesday.

The commentary in the overseas edition of the People's Daily said the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc (LEH.P: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) "may augur an even larger impending global 'financial tsunami'."

The People's Daily is the official newspaper of China's ruling Communist Party, and the overseas edition is a smaller circulation offshoot of the main paper.

Its pronouncements do not necessarily directly reflect leadership views, but this commentary by a professor at Shanghai's Tongji University suggested considerable official alarm at the strains buckling world financial markets.

China's central bank earlier this week cut its lending rate for the first time in six years, a move analysts said was aimed at bolstering the economy and the battered stock market.

"The eruption of the U.S. sub-prime crisis has exposed massive loopholes in the United States' financial oversight and supervision," writes the commentator, Shi Jianxun.

"The world urgently needs to create a diversified currency and financial system and fair and just financial order that is not dependent on the United States."

But Vice Premier Wang Qishan, on a visit to the United States, told U.S. trade officials in a meeting on Tuesday that China and the United States needed to maintain close economic ties with global markets going through such turbulence.

"The Chinese government is well aware of the fact that the United States, which is the world's largest developed country, and China, which is the world's largest developing country, should have constructive and cooperative economic and trade relations," he said.

China is a major buyer of U.S. Treasury bonds, and through its sovereign wealth fund it has taken stakes in two large U.S. financial institutions.

In July 2005, China revalued the yuan and freed it from a dollar peg to float within managed bands. But the yuan and China's trade remains tightly linked to the fortunes of the dollar.

The commentary suggested China must brace for grave economic fallout and look to alternatives, saying the crisis brings to mind the Great Depression of the 1930s.

"Lehman Brothers announced bankruptcy will not only have a domino effect on the global financial world, it will bring a shock to the world economy," the front-page comment stated.

(Reporting by Chris Buckley; Editing by Ken Wills)

Just think how much easier it will be to sell the Third Way synthesis during a global depression. The global planners know that desperate people make stupid choices. Will Americans fall for another New Deal? Maybe it's best to write it in Chinese and Russian so most Americans will accept a dumbed down translation of their new contract. Maybe too many of my generation can recognise the communist language in a globalist planning, so that's why they made such an effort to take over U.S. education, right Gislea?

The "C" word that nobody uses...

Here's a perfect example of why so few Americans know what communitarianism is. The dialectic between capitalism and communism is still a great way to keep Americans behind the times. The International communists merged in a perfect Hegelian synthesis with the Christian-Judaic capitalists over 20 years ago.

The patriotic "Christian right" loves to lead us back to focusing on the 1950s Cold War and the communist/socialist left so that 1) Opponents can be easily labeled and discounted as "red baiters" and "McCarthyists" and 2) Opponents will never address the 21st century laws and programs by their real names (which ensures they will never have the ability to stop it or challenge it in an American court of law).

Communitarianism is the perfect blend of all ideas and theories. It's the final stage of human social evolution as prescribed by the theorists who brought us every modern conflict, including capitalism versus communism. The left finds an easy target in the Christian Right (who often openly support the Zionist Radical Middle).

Charlotte Iserbyt knows what communitarianism is, but you'd never know that from her most recent article on regionalization and the NAU. Charlotte thinks we should all start calling commmunitarianism "communism."

The plans and structure for globalization is not called "communist law" in the academic or international legal community. It's called "communitarian law." Regionalization is emerging legislated under trade agreements that include the "Supremacy of Communitarian Law" clause. The EU Court is called the Communitarian Court of Justice. Hundreds of European and Latin American colleges offer Ph.D.s in Communitarian Law.

Barack Obamba and Hillary Clinton are openly identified in the American press as communitarian, not communist. But yeah okay, let's all start asking them about their "communist" beliefs so they can discount us as McCarthyists and minimalize any damage they might suffer by being asked REAL Qs.

I've had a lot of respect for Iserbyt since I beagn my research, and I've often tooted her horn in my articles, but come on Charlotte, who's deliberately dumbing down who?

From: norgesen, Sent: Feb 27, 2008 9:54 AM

To: Global_Police_State@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Conspiracy> The North American 'Soviet' Union

Regionalism is communism no matter how you slice it. The sooner Americans get that unpleasant fact permanently entered into their brains, and process that information into appropriate action, the sooner we will be able to escape what Orwell described so well in his novel 1984

THE NORTH AMERICAN 'SOVIET' UNION

By Charlotte Iserbyt

February 27, 2007

There is one common thread running through all articles and speeches by elected officials, well-known writers, and commentators in opposition to the merging of the United States into a political and economic regional arrangement known as the North American Union. To my knowledge, not one of them has chosen to use the “C” word (communism) when warning Americans of the dangers of this unconstitutional merger about to be foisted upon us without proper hearings in Congress. Excellent speeches and articles are being given and written warning us of all sorts of bad things related to this merger, including the fact that we will lose our sovereignty, but we are not being told that all these bad things are necessary for the full implementation of The North American Soviet Union (communistic/regional system). Isn’t the “C” word the one and only word which might shock Americans out of their state of conditioned apathy, thereby bringing about citizen activism which might result in killing this “regional” monster?

Morris Zeitlin, a communist writer for the Communist Party’s Daily World said in an article entitled “Planning is Socialism’s Trademark,” November 8, 1975: “We (USA) have no regional government and no comprehensive regional planning to speak of. Regional government and planning remain concepts our urban scholars and planners have long advocated in vain…In socialist countries, metropolitan regions enjoy metropolitan regional government and comprehensive planning. The economic and functional efficiencies and the social benefits that comprehensive national, regional and city planning make possible in socialist society explain the Soviet Union’s enormous and rapid economic social progress…”

Of interest regarding Zeitlin’s comment about “the Soviet Union’s enormous and rapid economic social progress…” is the following admission made by former President Gorbachev at the 2005 National School Board Association conference that “half the world’s population and two-thirds of Russia’s lives in poverty.”

The United States Government, at all levels, has since 1975 accepted wholeheartedly Zeitlin’s advice, to the extent that our country is, believe it or not, almost 100 percent socialist in its political, economic, social and environmental (sustainable development) policies. For documentation please read “Walks Like a Duck, Talks Like a Duck.”

The regionalization (consolidation) of the world is quite similar to the three-stage plan outlined by Stalin at the 1936 Communist International. At that meeting, the official program proclaimed:

“Dictatorship can be established only by a victory of socialism in different countries or groups of countries, after which there would be federal unions of the various groupings of these socialist countries, and the third stage would be an amalgamation of these regional federal unions into a world union of socialist nations.” (Ed note: The third stage is taking place right now as we in the United States of America become part of a federal union, the North American Union, which will in the near future become part of a world union of socialist nations.)

Former President of the Soviet Union Gorbachev on March 23, 2000, in London, referred to the European Union (EU) as "the New European Soviet.” If he refers to the EU in that way, it only stands to reason that he would refer to the North American Union (NAU) as the “New American Soviet,” since the NAU is modeled on the EU. Gorbachev also said in his speech to the Soviet Central Committee on November 2, 1987, published by Novosti Press Agency Publishing House:

“We are moving toward a new world, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.”

How is it possible that if American citizens or United States officials involved in putting us under the North American Union were aware of Gorbachev’s statements, they would not be very concerned regarding our nation becoming part of a communist world? Have we forgotten the many hundreds of millions of innocent people tortured, starved, murdered and incarcerated by communist regimes around the world? Authorities say “over 20 million people suffered in purges under Vladimir Lenin and Josef Stalin -- and that more than 10 million died before Stalin's death in 1953. Some put the number even higher.” [Read]

Do we really believe the communists have changed or gone away?

United States government officials, elected and unelected, with enormous financial assistance from the tax-exempt foundations, have for many years been working to implement unconstitutional regional planning at the local, state, national and international level, all of this required for full implementation of a One World Socialist Government. For the 3000-page transcript of 1953 Congressional (Reece and Cox Committee) Hearings to Investigate the Tax-Exempt Foundations and for superb research on the history of regional government, go to americandeception.com and type the following into its search engine: Reece Committee, Don Bell Reports, Maureen Heaton, the Mantooth Report, and The Emerging North American Union.

One very important government official in the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations, Under Secretary of State George W. Ball, spelled out very clearly what the Insiders were planning for our nation in The New York Times, 1/24/88: “…If we could internationalize by using the United Nations in conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to fear in most cases a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the shape of the world and might get the UN back doing something useful. …Sooner or later we’re going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they’re not confined merely to the nation states. Start first on a regional, and ultimately you can move to a world, basis.” (emphasis added).

Has our education system so successfully conditioned and dumbed down Americans that they no longer are able to apply logic to the above quotes? Are they no longer capable of transferring that knowledge, processing it into new knowledge and conclusions which might help them understand and oppose the present destruction of our Constitutional Republic?

Since all regional groupings being set up around the world are based on the communistic Free Trade “redistribute the wealth” philosophy, why is it that the adjective “Communist” is never used when discussing GATT, NAFTA, CAFTA and the NAU? Those patriotic writers could at least describe those agreements as “Communism LITE,” couldn’t they?

For those Americans who recall the days of elected officials, not unelected, appointed task forces and “councils” (soviets, according to most dictionaries), running our towns, schools, counties, states, nation and world, recognizing this change in our form of government should not be too difficult.

However, for those younger Americans denied an education in American history and government due to the activities of the tax-exempt foundations, especially the Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie Foundations, the loss of elected officials through regionalism does not seem to bother them. Go to americandeception.com and type into search engine “Kenny Hignite” and you will see a most astonishing six-page 1954 “Test on the United States Constitution” on which Hignite received a grade of 99 – “Excellent!” There is absolutely no way that Kenny Hignite, now 66 years old, having received such an excellent education on the U.S. Constitution in a public school in Central California in 1954, would not be questioning the present deliberate destruction of our representative form of government through the implementation of communistic regional government!

Those Americans under fifty years old, and too often those over 50 years old (!), will ask you “What’s wrong with members of the community or faceless state bureaucrats being appointed to assist our elected officials in their work which has become increasingly complicated?” The simple answer is “If you don’t approve of what those unelected officials are doing, you can’t get rid of them at the polls.”

Uneducated Americans will also ask you:

“What’s wrong with consolidation of school districts, services, the merging of individual school and town budgets to “save taxpayers money?” (Ed note: In Maine our Senate Education Committee is about to approve Governor Baldacci’s proposal to slash school districts by proposing 26 regional school units statewide with 26 superintendents, compared to the existing 152 superintendents and 290 school units!);

“What’s wrong with merging 16 towns under one county council as was recently proposed in Cumberland County, Maine, thereby eliminating representative government?”;

“What’s wrong with getting rid of local school boards and having our schools run by city Mayors, or contracting education out to private organizations connected with the corporations?”;

“What possible objection could you have to public school morals and values education even if those programs are forbidden to teach ‘absolute’ morals and values based on the Ten Commandments?”;

“What’s wrong with publicly-funded charter schools which have no elected school boards?”;

“What’s wrong with Cuban-style school-to-work job training replacing a K-12 liberal arts curriculum? Even if my child can’t read, I sure want him/her to be able to get a job.”;

“What’s wrong with public/private partnerships?”

“What’s wrong with the federal government mandating mental health screening for my child?”;

“What’s wrong with members of the community assisting the local police in monitoring citizen activities and/or the police handing out awards to citizens who do good deeds, as is the case with the Community-Oriented Policing System (COPS) in Maine?”;

“What’s wrong with putting the UN’s lifelong learning agenda, all community services (birth through death), under the umbrella of the school district? (Go to americandeception.com and type “Feld” into search engine for a remarkable research paper on the history of Community Education)

“What’s wrong with a National I.D. card reportedly designed by two Russian ex-KGB Chiefs?”;

“What’s wrong with students being required to perform community service in order to graduate?”;

“What’s wrong with federal funding of religious organizations (faith-based initiative)?”;

“What’s wrong with federally-funded school choice proposals?”;

“What’s wrong with dropping borders between states?” as is in the offing.

And, the subject of this article: “What’s wrong with regional government?” And many more “What’s Wrong With?” questions from good Americans who have, over many years, through no fault of their own, been deliberately dumbed down and didn’t receive the public education which required the likes of Kenny Hignite to know their Constitution and form of government.

How many Americans realize that almost all the programs mentioned in the above “What’s Wrong With” section have already been implemented in our schools, communities, and states and that they are based on communist/socialist collectivist philosophy? The planners are waiting only for the full implementation of the North American Union (final nail in coffin) which will allow them to write and approve, as was done in Europe, the North American Union’s Constitution (Communist Manifesto) which will include all the above “What’s Wrong With?” programs. That will be the infamous day when the U.S. Constitution is formally relegated to history’s trash bin. And, as with the EU Constitution, or the Communist Manifesto, the practice of Christianity will be outlawed… a thing of the past. All religions will be considered equal and inevitably superior to Christianity. Go to americandeception.com and type into search engine “Religion and Governance” an important position paper by Harlan Cleveland, notorious supporter of global government, long-time member of the internationalist Aspen Institute, and first U.S. Ambassador to the Common Market (1960), and Marc Luycx, a Belgian change agent bureaucrat. This paper was prepared by the Foreward Study Group of the European Commission and was undoubtedly used by those drafting the EU Constitution. It will give you a picture of the non-role of Christianity in world region constitutions.

Our elected officials in Congress, who have sworn to uphold the Constitution, should not be immune to multi-million dollar lawsuits for injuries sustained by the citizens of this country. Is not the loss of our freedoms due to elected officials’ malpractice (lying to us in regard to putting us under the communistic regional North American Union and not holding hearings on the subject) even more important than the death of one patient due to a doctor’s malpractice, the scalding of a woman who spilled her “too-hot” coffee at a McDonald’s takeout, or the death from cancer of a woman who smoked too many cigarettes? How can we ignore the fact that 651,008 Americans have died in battle to protect and defend the constitutional freedoms which will vanish under this new international regional arrangement? Is there really no penalty to be exacted of these highly-paid Congressional traitors other than voting them out of office, which it seems is impossible to do due to both political parties having the same agenda, controlled media, manipulated political conventions, and election fraud?

Americans have been conditioned to NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, since the days of McCarthyism and the phony fall of communism, mention the “C” word. The word must, as George Orwell might have said, be removed from the dictionaries of all languages, especially English. Otherwise, we might wise up and tackle this treason with all our might and brains since we surely don't want our children and grandchildren living under any “ism” form of government, much less “communism.” The Insiders know that “communism” is the one and only word that must be banished from use. They are not concerned over excellent anti-North American Union rantings and ravings as long as the “C” word is NOT used.

The Insiders, most if not all of whom are corporate communists, have no fear of the coming totalitarian system since they have been assured they will be sitting in the catbird seat, having eliminated all economic competition and self-government (elected officials), and will have the world as their playground. The majority of the world’s population, the Insiders’ “human resources”, will be their highly trained and conditioned serfs, lifelong.

One might ask, how can this be? It is a well-known and documented fact that Wall Street funded the Bolshevik Revolution and the corporate communists and our government have been supporting the communist regime in Russia since 1917. Extensive exchange agreements covering political, municipal, cultural, economic, legal, law enforcement, education, science, sports, medicine, etc. have been signed since 1958 between the USSR and the USA, including of special importance the 1985 education agreements signed by Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev which merged our two education systems and caused to be implemented the Soviet polytechnical work force/job quota system and the Pavlovian outcomes-based method of conditioning/training. Go to americandeception.com for full text of “Agreement between U.S.A. and USSR.”

Regionalism is communism no matter how you slice it. The sooner Americans get that unpleasant fact permanently entered into their brains, and process that information into appropriate action, the sooner we will be able to escape what Orwell described so well in his novel 1984:

"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on the human face--forever...and remember, that is forever."

Forward this article to your friends and to your elected officials at the local, state, and national level. Of equal importance restore the "C" word to your vocabulary and use it often.

© 2007 Charlotte T. Iserbyt - All Rights Reserved

Charlotte Iserbyt is the consummate whistleblower! Iserbyt served as Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education, during the first Reagan Administration, where she first blew the whistle on a major technology initiative which would control curriculum in America's classrooms. Iserbyt is a former school board director in Camden, Maine and was co-founder and research analyst of Guardians of Education for Maine (GEM) from 1978 to 2000. She has also served in the American Red Cross on Guam and Japan during the Korean War, and in the United States Foreign Service in Belgium and in the Republic of South Africa.

Iserbyt is a speaker and writer, best known for her 1985 booklet Back to Basics Reform or OBE: Skinnerian International Curriculum and her 1989 pamphlet Soviets in the Classroom: America's Latest Education Fad which covered the details of the U.S.-Soviet and Carnegie-Soviet Education Agreements which remain in effect to this day. She is a freelance writer and has had articles published in Human Events, The Washington Times, The Bangor Daily News, and included in the record of Congressional hearings.

Website: www.deliberatedumbingdown.com

E-Mail: dumbdown00@yahoo.com

http://www.newswithviews.com/iserbyt/iserbyt36.htm

==

Iraq Veteran Victim of Government Abuse 11-23-07

Operation save U.S. 3-7-07

The North American 'Soviet' Union 2-27-07

The Devil's seven prong fork 1-13-07

Restoring the Draft: The Universal National Service Act of 2006 6-5-06

Maine's Never-Ending Assault on Traditional Education 4-9-06

Happy New Year Gift For America 1-3-06

Reject Political Correctness! Shout 'Merry Christmas' 12-7-05

Preparing Children for Virtual /World Classrooms, Part 2 - 8-29-05

Revolution in Education - Soviet Style, Part 1 - 8-29-05

The Robotic CAFTA Vote 7-28-05

Help Defeat CAFTA! 7-25-05

Hooray For France! 5-31-05

Base Closures: Disarming America 5-27-05

Unanimous Treason 5-12-05

Miracles Still Happen! 4-9-05

Refuse the National I.D. Card 2-12-05

Intelligence Reform's Internal Passport 12-31-04

Shame on Buchanan! 10-21-04

"Achtung! Your Passport, Bitte" 10-14-04

Many Ways to Skin a Cat 6-6-04

American Culture Takes a Hit 5-7-04

You'll Know it's True When it Happens to You 3-7-04

The Passion of Christ 3-2-04

Warning: The Impending Draft 2-25-04

Regionalism is Communism 2-4-04

Walks Like a Duck; Talks Like a Duck... 1-13-04

Happy New Year: Keep Your Eye on The Ball 1-1-04

Uncle Sam Wants You, Your Sister, and Your Girl Friend or Wife! 11-11-03

United States-Russian Merger: A Done Deal? 10-16-03

Bush Must Go! 8-4-03

Former KGB Heads To Help Spy On Americans 4-24-03

Former USSR Premier/ex KGB Head To Work for Homeland Security! 4-23-03

Community/ Communist Oriented Policing 2-13-03

New Spectator Sport for Americans...Watch it Play Out! 2-1-03

Kissinger out of the Closet

Cold War Myth: An Exercise in the Use of the Dialectic

Death Sentence for Private and Home Education, Courtesy of Supreme Court

No American Left Alone!

Regionalism is communitarianism no matter how you slice it. But why learn the real terms of the present or the future when you can comfortably languish in the past?

Communitarian Regional Integration via U.S. Parks

I'm doing some quick research trying to find the source for a City data site that claims the employment rates are going to raise 12% here in the next 3 years. There's no industry to speak of here, the farms are mostly all family owned. Where are these new jobs going to come from? My guess is Princess Tours has plans to expand their operations into the Wrangells and build a repeat of what they accomplished in Denali.

McKinley Village is their "new" town outside Healy, Alaska. Only open in the summer, it hosts hundreds of thousands of visitors in giant hotels. Main street on the Parks Highway is like an Alaskan Disneyland facade with cute little retail cabins and raised wooden walkways. The majority of the employees are young Europeans and outsiders who work long hours for low wages, live in compounds owned by Princess and drink like there's no tomorrow. These operations contribute little to the local economy, are gaining more land by the minutes, and the Park's officials control ALL new local development (I met the Park Director's secretary in Cantwell and she filled me in on the way political decisions are made in Denali Park).

There is already a 200 acre Princess Hotel near Copper Center on the Richardson Hwy. I've seen plans that call the roads between here and Denali Park "adventure corridors." While flagging on the Edgerton last summer I heard more than one visitor exclaim shock! at seeing so many people out here because they were told it's a wilderness.

The Kluane/Wrangell-St. Elias National Parks, Yukon and Alaska: Seeking Sustainability through Biosphere Reserves
D. Scott Slocombe
Mountain Research and Development, Vol. 12, No. 1 (Feb., 1992), pp. 87-96
doi:10.2307/3673750
This article consists of 10 page(s):

"Abstract

"Biosphere reserve" is a Unesco designation intended to recognize areas with strong natural values and minimal human use. Biosphere reserve designation encourages regional integration of protected areas through the establishment of buffer zones and locally-based management committees. It also promotes use of biosphere reserves for environmental monitoring and research. This concept becomes relevant in terms of regional integration, scientific management, and sustainable development concerns in and around many protected areas. It suggests the need to assess proposed and potential biosphere reserves in the context of regional environmental and cultural change. This paper discusses the prospects and implications of biosphere reserve designation for the Kluane/Wrangell-St. Elias National Parks and Preserve region which extends both sides of the Canada-USA boundary in Yukon and Alaska. Here it could contribute to regional integration and coordination of activities for sustainable development and provide scientific information concerning environmental and socioeconomic change. /// "Reserve de la biosphere" est un terme utilise par l'Unesco pour designer des zones d'un grand interet naturel et d'utilisation humaine de longue duree. Cette designation encourage l'integration regionale des zones protegees, qui peut se faire en etablissant des zones tampons et des comites de gestion locaux. Elle encourage egalement l'utilisation des reserves de la biosphere pour la surveillance et l'etude de l'environnement. Ce concept devient pertinent en termes d'integration regionale, de gestion scientifique et de developpement soutenable pour beaucoup de zones protegees. Il suggere le besoin d'evaluer les reserves de la biosphere, proposees et potentielles, dans le cadre du changement environnemental et culturel regional. Cet article examine les perspectives d'avenir et les implications de la designation en tant que "reserve de la biosphere" des Parcs nationaux Kluane/Wrangell-St. Elias et de la reserve naturelle qui s'etend des deux cotes de la frontiere entre le Canada et les Etats-Unis dans le Yukon et l'Alaska. Pour cette region, la designation pourrait contribuer a l'integration regionale et a la coordination des activites visant a un developpement soutenable, et a la collecte de donnees scientifiques relatives au changement environnemental et socioeconomique. /// Nach einer Definition der Unesco sind "Biospharenreservate" Gebiete mit nahezu intakter Natur und hohem menschlichen Nutzungswert, den es zu erhalten gilt. Die Erklarung eines Gebietes zum Biospharenreservat bestimmt das Ausmass der regionalen Integration von geschutzten Landschaftsgebieten durch Schaffung von Schutzgurteln unter ortsansassigem Management. Daneben fordern Biospharenreservate die Uberwachung und Erforschung der Umwelt. Regionale Integration, wissenschaftliches Management und langzeitige Entwicklung der vielen Schutzgebiete und ihrer Umgebung sind fur dieses Konzept wichting. Vorgesehene und potentielle Biospharenreservate mussen hinsichtlich ihrer regionalen Umweltveranderungen und der kulturellen Folgen beurteilt werden. Diese Veroffentlichung diskutiert die Aussichten und Folgen fur den Fall, dass die Kluane/Wrangell-St. Elias Nationalparks und Schutzgebiete zum Biospharenreservat erklart werden, das sich beidseitig der kanadisch-amerikanischen Grenze im Yukon Territorium und in Alaska erstreckt. Hier konnte es zur regionalen Integration und zur Koordination des langfristigen Naturschutzes beitragen, und konnte ausserdem wissenschaftliche Information uber Umweltveranderungen und sozio-okonomischen Wandel liefern."

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0276-4741(199202)12%3A1%3C87%3ATKENPY%3E2.0.CO%3B2-R

Now I know this is old news for most outside Americans since they've been stealing land for the parks for a long time down there. But they haven't won all of Alaska yet, there's still a strong local presense that won't just move away so the tourists can see wild animals on the road between here and Denali. And I don't imagine it will matter much to people here that French and German academics have been aware of plans to regionalize us and create buffer zones here since at least 1992.

Notice this is the first International Park, as it crosses the border with Canada and includes Kluane, Yukon Territory. That's actually gorgeous country and I always stopped there whenever I drove the Alcan Highway, so on a personal level I don't mind being lumped in with those hardy folks. But this is what regionalization (NAU) is designed to do, and it's ALL established under the supremacy of communitarian law.

Development in this region will be conducted as all communitarian development is.. by tiny committees "protecting" it. Maybe we need to start our own community development committee so that when the changes come we remain the rulers of our region.

Complex Communitarian Cops on Camels

Security, Human Rights and Humanitarian Actions

Week 2, 23 - 27 June 2008

Overview

This module focuses on the interactions between states and individuals within an increasingly legalized international context. It explores recent efforts to provide international humanitarian assistance (in cases of natural disasters or in cases of civil wars). The programme also focuses on international efforts to control the spread of weapons as well as on mechanisms for conflict resolution between states.

The importance of international organizations will be examined, such as International Red Cross, UN High Commissioner for Refugees, the UN Council of Human Rights, as well as the UN Security Council and UN General Assembly or the International Court of Justice.

The programme will also evaluate the role of NGOs and private initiatives in the protection of individual rights and the promotion of human security.

Morning lectures will focus on:

• Complexity of Human Security
• Practical issues on negotiating disarmament
• Humanitarian Law and the role of non-state actors
• Roles of international organisations and non-governmental organisations in peace building

Afternoon workshops and visits:

• Meeting with Delegates of International Organisations based in Geneva
• Visit to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
• Small group interactive seminars with experts
• Participation to the United Nations Conference on Disarmament
• Evening debate with a guest speaker on current issues

Social events:

• Welcome dinner
• Week-end trip suggestions

Detailed syllabus will be provided to admitted participants before the programme."

http://graduateinstitute.ch/executive/summer/international-affairs/programme-IA/security-human-rights_en.html

Creating a Communitarian North American Union (NAU)

It's finally dipping below zero.

The door will look like this for the rest of the winter... it's kind of a good idea to keep an axe handy.

Nobody's needed a flashlight around here for a week.

When I have time, I take every link I see to a website that claims to fully explain the North American Union (NAU). I search these sites looking for other global government researchers who identify Communitarianism as the power structure for the emerging supra-national synthesis. This is a mostly frustrating endeavor. As more and more "experts" on globalization and the NAU come into the "fray" (as I'm beginning to see the research community), the reality of communitarianism as the foundation for the entire new system is buried even deeper under the hoards of materials devoted to "exposing the New World Order." I must have visited a million websites since 1999, and I utilize their site search engines. I can say that the number of search returns for the word "communitarianis" has significantly increased in the past eight (almost nine) years. But, even with a current 371,000 returns on google, most "expose" websites have nothing onsite using that term. Government websites using the term are also rare. The best place to find it are in upper academia and European governments in the EU.

This continuing obscurity in publications geared toward American readers is unbelievable. Communitaranism is the legal system. It's a primary ingrediant in the globalist's soup; it's the name of the recipie. I'm getting suspicious in my old age, and I'm slowly beginning to understand how the emerging government planted their disinformation operatives a long time ago, because I think the whole anti-globalist movement operates like a perfectly contrived Hegelian scenario.

The "left" side of the opposition leads the street protests and anti-WTO rallys. It was a leftist coalition of professional agitators that shut down the ministerial meetings in November, 1999. The left's variety of street theatre and actions were planned by an organization called DAN, the Direct Action Network. Very professional and efficent, DAN trained American volunteers in numerous actions designed to disrupt and "shut down the WTO." Part of the loosely connected but highly organized group were the National Lawyers Guild (who trained witnesses), the human chains (who locked arms around the convention center), the human barricades (who laid down in the intersections), and last but not least, the London and Eugene anarchists (who destroyed the property of carefully selected corporate stores that profit from slave labor).

The literature produced by the left will not explain that the WTO is a communitarian court, set up as a temporary justice system prior to NAU regionalisation and a new NAU parliment.

The "right" side of the opposition also leads their people in street protests, trains them to shut down abortion clinic actions, and they sponsor anti-SPP/NAU rallys. They are not nearly as professionally trained, organized or supported as is the left. The "right" includes the John Birchers (the most visable opponets of the U.N. since their inception) , the Libertarians (who are also pro-U.N. globalists), the Free American, the World Net Daily, the Constitution Party (who want to restore a Biblical constitution), the Klammath Bucket Brigades and the Sawgrass Rebellion (both exceptions to the unorganized reference above), Stop Agenda 21, the National Rifle Association, Stop the Trans-Texas Corridor, the Minutemen, We the People Foundation and, my all-time favorite, Stop the NAU.

In all the literature produced by the right, only a handful of researchers will define the emerging NAU justice system as communitarian law.

The NRA has two very good articles on specific balancing acts under communitarian law (on communitarianism and the 2nd amendment). Devvy Kidd, Berit Kjos, Charlotte Iserbyt, Detective Phillip Worts, Joan Veon, Michael Shaw, Darren Weeks, Nancy Levant, Chris Gerner, and Bobby Garner have all written original articles or books that include the term communitarianism (some more than others). Bobby, Darren , Chris, Berit and Nancy have written numerous original articles explaing communitarian thinking in great detail. But for the most part, very few writers on the right seem willing to do more than mention it once or twice.

Lately, very weird things have started happening, not the least being my communitarian law research was plagiarized by Dave Hodges, Director of the Arizona Constitution Party, (I don't include his articles on communitarian law in the above list of researchers for obvious reasons). This could mean several things, all of them seeming way too "cloak and dagger" for me to seriously consider... but I do plan to meet these obstacles as if I knew their game. I've also met a bunch of new people, and apparently not all of them are who or what they claim to be either.

Then there's this super weird (even for me!) group of Fusionsts at leftrightunite.com. Nord calls them the borg, and they keep trying to engage me in boring dialectical arguments. Terry Hayfield, their leader, is a Fusionist associated with the rightwing Birchers and leftwing labor, who uses 666 in his email address. His twist on us outright calls our studying communitarianism WRONG, not because he knows more or differently about communitarianism and can dispute our thesis, but because he's an expert on Permanent Revolution and Marxist economic theory. He refuses to even discuss communitarianism because it's a waste of his expert time. He also seems to think him and I are in some kind of an undergraduate contest of egos, defending and arguing over other people's theories. He never addresses mine and Nordica's original and published Hegelian-communitarian thesis, or our original, undisputed conclusion. He prefers instead to insist that I am a just stubborn, uncompromising, selfish idiot, and an anti-semitic to boot. Now, so does his borg. It's creepy, to say the least.

As more sites pick up on my article Dialectical Freedom, I should expect more weirdness. And in the funny way that this old world works, all this new harassment has inspired me to do a complete assessment of the leading Western and English speaking theorists writing about the NAU, the Bilderberg, the G-8, the U.N., the Fed, the IRS, the CFR, the TR, and CAFTA, in order to determine which ones actually talk about the emerging system.

Bur first Nordica and I are going to revise 2020 for a 2008 edition that includes a whole new section on international communitarianism. Currently ordered books should be going out by next Monday, I am so sorry but we've had one horrible delay after another; if anyone knows a good, reliable printer in Anchorage or even online, please let us know. Sure with I knew how to put it online for download ordering, Nordica does but she's swamped with work and the baby.

I'm also thinking about building my place into an anticommunitarian school and offer once in a lifetime "seminars" in Alaska. I'll invite folks to study with us, share their stories, write articles and books and take side trips exploring our wilderness neighborhood. I can build GerTees for housing our guests, travel GerTees for overnight backcountry expeditions (and I found a guy with draft horses) a big meeting GerTee tha seats 1oo+ people, and finally build a GerTee bathhouse/sweat lodge. I want to call it GerTeeville. That nice WTC architect who wrote me about them hated the name, but I like sounding like a character out of Horton Hears a Who.