And Now For A World Government, by Gideon Rachman, Financial Times

Well, it had to happen sooner or later. The "respected" press could not go on forever pretending there are no plans to establish a One World Government. Rachman starts out assuring us he's not a conspiracy nut, and then moves right into describing the EU's supranational system of governance. He makes sure he mentions the EU's accumulated body of law twice in the second graph.

Of course he didn't feel it was important to NAME that body of law for his American readers. Nor did he feel it was relevant in this "fact based" story to describe how it is already underway across the globe (including the USA) via UN Local Agenda 21 Programmes and Community Economic Development. No mention of sustainable development or the role it plays in the balance between national law and international law. He gives just enough watered down information to lead Americans straight back into the dialectic. Heaven forbid Americans should have any other options for stopping Fabian plans besides fruitless armed rebellions. Peaceful non-compliance of unconstitutional laws, treaties, regulations and agreements doesn't play into the synthesis, so why bother explaining how that can be accomplished. It's much better for the globalists if American people think the only way to fight a War on Words is with guns. It's also a huge help if people never understand what communitarian law is. Leave them stuck in the capitalism versus communism divide and they'll never know what hit them.

"We cannot expect the Americans to jump from capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans small doses of socialism until they suddenly awake to find they have Communism."
- Soviet Leader Nikita Khrushchev, 1959 (posted by Bob Lanzer in a comment to Rachman's article)

Krushchev, like all the Soviets, was an EXPERT liar. If the synthesis was planned at the same time the thesis (capitalism) and antithesis (communism) were, and the goal was always to create a solution called world government, then should we believe Krushchev's 50 year old promise or the REALITY of what we actually live with today?

Will this revelation change my public status from wacko to intelligent political analyst (or at least just a concerned citizen)? I doubt it. My focus on the synthesis (the actual EU laws) means I'm still too ahead of their propaganda game. Barack Obama will be the one who introduces the synthesis to the global "masses," not me. And he'll make it sound a lot better than I do.

And now for a world government, by Gideon Rachman, Financial Times:

"I have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. I have never seen black helicopters hovering in the sky above Montana. But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.

"A "world government" would involve much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.

"So could the European model go global? There are three reasons for thinking that it might." {boldface mine} Read the rest of this article: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7a03e5b6-c541-11dd-b516-000077b07658.html

Many thanks to Larry G. for sending me this link!

Financial Summit Agrees on the Goals

In my layman attempts to keep up with the Financial Meltdown I've read a lot of differing opinions on the root causes for the crisis. More than a few are blaming capitalism and thousands of professional writers and economists are saying the bankers and Wall Street corporations with their crooked practices are the cause. Someone from the Securities Commission came in on my James Trafficant speech post, I need to go read that again and see if makes more sense after all this other stuff I've been studying.

Finished reading this report and I'm still left wondering what version of "common understanding of the root cause" was reached by the G20 (and so quickly..wow). It appears they all agree on communitarian rule of law, but they just call it "rule of law" and from what I read they didn't bother to define exactly which rules they mean (and there is a vast conflict between U.S. Rule of Law and Communitarian Law). It's as if we already agree there is only one. Gee, maybe the U.S. signed something already that bound us to a new rule of law.

From the White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/financialmarkets/index.html

Today's Summit achieved five key objectives. The leaders:

* Reached a common understanding of the root causes of the global crisis;
* Reviewed actions countries have taken and will take to address the immediate crisis and strengthen growth;
* Agreed on common principles for reforming our financial markets;
* Launched an action plan to implement those principles and asked ministers to develop further specific recommendations that will be reviewed by leaders at a subsequent summit; and
* Reaffirmed their commitment to free market principles.

Making national laws and regulations more consistent for international cooperation did get mentioned, although the assurance is that this is an ongoing process with more specific recommendations to come later. The crisis is a perfect avenue to introduce a supreme global system. The solutions will be hard for Americans (or any nation) to refuse to accept. So far, all they're saying about law is this:

"Reinforcing international cooperation by making national laws and regulations more consistent and encouraging regulators to enhance their coordination and cooperation across all segments of financial markets."

Obama will be president by the next meeting. He'll be taking immediate steps.

# The leaders agreed that immediate steps could be taken or considered to restore growth and support emerging market economies by:

* Continuing to take whatever further actions are necessary to stabilize the financial system;
* Recognizing the importance of monetary policy support and using fiscal measures, as appropriate;
* Providing liquidity to help unfreeze credit markets; and
* Ensuring that the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank and other multilateral development banks (MDBs) have sufficient resources to assist developing countries affected by the crisis, as well as provide trade and infrastructure financing.

They're tying the whole solution to the WTO. It's a court of communitarian law.

The leaders agreed that needed reforms will be successful only if they are grounded in a commitment to free market principles, including the rule of law, respect for private property, open trade and investment, competitive markets, and efficient, effectively-regulated financial systems. The leaders further agreed to:

* Reject protectionism, which exacerbates rather than mitigates financial and economic challenges;
* Strive to reach an agreement this year on modalities that leads to an ambitious outcome to the Doha Round of World Trade Organization negotiations;
* Refrain from imposing any new trade or investment barriers for the next 12 months; and
* Reaffirm development assistance commitments and urge both developed and emerging economies to undertake commitments consistent with their capacities and roles in the global economy.

No new trade or investment barriers for the next 12 months. All bets are off.

Financial Summit tomorrow! Now is the time for the world to unite, right?

Photo credit

Very little stands between the Communitarians and their plans for a more moral one world government. While their plan would have gone forward regardless of which team won the US Presidential election, Obama and Biden can be counted upon to change the US with a friendlier face.

Besides, now that I've confirmed his connection to John McKnight, ABCD, Amitai Etzioni, and the Communitarian Platform, I have no doubt anymore who trained Obama. It makes total sense that the Republicans never used the word communitarian to describe Obama's politics. If mainstream news had to tell US voters the communitarian principles behind community economic development, it would have been too easy for even the most uneducated citizen to see the similarities in Obama's community activism and Palin's community renewal. (Personally, I decided Palin was chosen to make sure Obama won, and I think she knew it. She told us in one of her many recent TV interviews that "nobody runs a campaign to lose...")

Here's the communitarians argument for a global regulatory "right":

A. The financial crisis in the U.S. is affecting markets worldwide.
B. The U.S. cannot solve their own emergency because the world's financial markets are interdependent.
C. Therefore: the U.S. requires a higher authority to control their local market.

I may not know much about banking and the history of banking, but I DO know their programme for centralized world rule requires a one banking system (and global taxes).

There has to be a consensus on which law rules supreme, worldwide:
Communitarian/Community Rule of Law has been established REGIONALLY via the WTO, Free Trade Agreements, Environmental Treaties, Congressional Acts, and Executive Orders.
The European Union is the model for regional integration. See the list of Communitarian Law Schools and programs on the right hand sidebar for quick confirmation of this.

There must be an established global state religion:
All religions are regulated by the new government if they accepted $= grants in public-private partnerships called faith-based and asset based community development. Programs include: Asset Based Community Development (ABCD), Problem Oriented Community Policing (COPS), community mental health, domestic violence prevention, and diversity/tolerance training.

http://www.mike-green.org/wkspschedule.php

All land use must be controlled and directed by the global state:
UN Local Agenda 21 Programme for Development is based upon sustainable development. This ideology is the principle for all land management plans, worldwide. Every government agency in the world states this term in their mission statement. Local Programs include: Vision 2020, Neighborhood Plans, Emergency Evacuation Plans, Revised Noise Ordinances, Scenic ByWays, Conservation Easements, Watershed protections, Animal Identification, Wildlife Areas, Wilderness designations, Clean Water/Air Acts, Rewilding America, and thousands more.

The entire bureaucratic structure for a central global government is underway in every sector of public life. From Ireland to South Carolina, the exact same ABCD datagathering program is being introduced under the lovely claim that the only aim is to help poor people on welfare.

People living in government subsidized housing and receiving government grants and other "help" have been the pilot tests for all the new asset mapping programs. Not only are our less fortunate and dependent neighbors more apt to willingly participate and "volunteer" their personal data, but they also are the LEAST likely to have the money to sue their government officials for gross violations of fundamental liberties under national and state constitutional laws.

Their assumption is that sustainability must be achieved at every level of human life, in every association we have. There's a reason why the sustainable development ideology was NEVER a topic in the campaign. It's not up for public debate, and it never will be, unless people insist on it. We will all be built from the inside out, and rest assured, we will all be required to contribute to the process. Many will give their whole lives to the cause, but the ones who reject it will be prosecuted as selfish and immoral. Only guilty people will be arrested for violating the new law. It's been called a Bill of Duties, and we can safely expect to hear more about that, real soon.

In a vital community, "everyone gives his/her gifts."

Guide to Building Sustainable Organizations From the Inside Out

This workbook is based on the work of SHOW-21, a project introduced by the Chicago Foundation for Women. SHOW-21 (Sustainability of Health Organizations for Women into the 21st Century) is an innovative example of how successful capacity building can be undertaken among nonprofit organizations. SHOW-21 is based on the assumption that sustainability can be achieved when organizations recognize and understand the full measure of their assets and capacities and then build upon them. http://www.sesp.northwestern.edu/abcd/resources/orgs/

******

The Asset-Based Community Development Religious Network is a network of people of faith who are working to support and build community within their congregations and neighborhoods, following the basic principles of asset-based community development, which are:

• everyone has a gift
• vital communities are those in which everyone gives his/her gift.

Network members are currently focused on the following areas:

• building congregations from the inside out, starting with the strengths and assets of their members rather than relying solely on outside "experts" and resources;
  
• involving congregation-based people in building communities using the asset-based community development approach;
• applying congregational and community asset-based approaches to vital public policy issues such as welfare reform

Some of the tools that local congregations and communities are developing for their work:

• capacity inventories: an interview format to help discover the skills and gifts of members or local residents;
• community assets maps: lists and surveys of local citizen groups and local institutions to involve in the community-building process;
• self-help groups

For me it always leads back to what the comms were doing in my Seattle neighborhood in 1999. The same people who were gathering information about my assets and skills work for the same people who run the White House from behind the scenes, and none of them are Americans. The question I ask myself now is this: Would I be better off to "join" the communitarians and make a living off my asociations in the network, as opposed to using my precious "free" time left exposing them as frauds and scammers?

I know where the grants are, I know what they want most, and I know the language they use. I know that if I proposed an innovative way to implement a datagathering operation with a friendly face I'd get "help." I know if I joined a compromised faith organization and said all the right things I could become a community leader with access to millions. I can't get in on the big Wall Street bailout but that doesn't mean I'm excluded from all the "free" money. If Sarah Palin could find 27 million in grants for Wasilla, maybe we can do that for Kenny Lake. Maybe we could start a police station with COPS grants too, set up a neighborhood spywatch and find innovative ways to monitor our neighbors' financial assets and moral lives.

Everyone in the world is considered to be a financial asset. What law will be used in binding resolutions at tommorow's financial summit?