Travel News from msnbc.com

Here's the latest news from the mainstream viewpoint, includes a story about a man with a urostomy bag having a humiliating experience during a TSA pat down, videos, and a list of all the U.S. airports now offering the new enhanced security.

Does anybody else remember how fun it used to be to fly? People had huge parties at the airports, meeting arrivals and seeing people off was normal for Americans. I tended bar at both major Alaskan airports so I know airport bars were our old social hubs, even for people traveling with children. Then the communitarians came along and started regulating Americans' public drinking and smoking and eating and in my opinion, it's all gone straight downhill from there. I believe that when we allowed trained facilitators to tell us what was bad for us and allowed them to press their opinions into law, we gave up our adulthood and became wards of Big Mother. If our neo government has the power to tell us how many drinks we can order in one night, then why would we expect to be able to say we won't pull our pants down if we need a spanking?

Seems like all kinds of horror stories about tsa harassment that happened over the past eight years are being revived for recently planned "opt out" days. I read a new old story every day. Makes me wonder what it would have been like if the Germans and Italians had internet in the 30s and we moderns had all their blogs and facebook pages to study for similarities.

It's kind of weird but I'm getting regular hits on the TSA job post I made of the local craigslist ad for Anchorage Airport TSA testers, from people looking for information about how to apply. Is it ethical for me to trick unsuspecting people into coming to my blog?

TSA pat-down leaves traveler covered in urine
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40291856/ns/travel-news

SNL TSA spoof http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joIxWcFO3bY

Song/video: Don't Touch My Junk (with a blatant pitch for Alex Jones embedded in the script) http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/70298.html

Thanks to Connie for finding these links!

RAND Corporation Blueprint for Militarized “Stability Police Force”

It looks to me like the communitarians need America to have another civil war before they can completely destroy our nation. After all they've done to us I guess it just wasn't enough to make us into proper and obediant slaves. Based on nothing but hope and one short conversation with a Green Beret, I do not think all American law officers or all of our military will obey orders to fire upon unarmed or armed civilians. Maybe the soldiers who will kill their own familes and friends can shoot it out with the ones that won't kill Americans, and leave the civilian population out of it altogther. For a world led by such spiritually evolved and enlightened people, they sure act and plan like their god is Mars... and their ritual is war. If there has to be war, I say let the soldiers fight it... man to man. But evolved global weaklings don't even know what that means, do they?

Thanks to Consuelo for this:

December 10, 2009

RAND Corporation Blueprint for Militarized “Stability Police Force”

Posted by William Grigg on December 10, 2009 05:08 PM

The RAND Corporation, one of the most fecund research arms of the Military-Industrial-Homeland Security Complex, has released a study entitled A Stability Police Force for the United States: Justification and Creating U.S. Capabilities.

The SPFOR (to use the inevitable acronym) would be a “hybrid” military/law enforcement unit created within the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) for use “in a range of tasks such as crowd and riot control, special weapons and tactics (SWAT), and investigations of organized criminal groups” — both abroad, in UN-directed multilateral military operations, and at home, as dictated by the needs of the Regime.

Initially as small as 2–6,000 personnel, the SPFOR’s size “could be increased by augmenting it with additional federal, state, or local police from the United States” as necessary.

The RAND study, which was conducted for the U.S. Army’s Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute, recommended using the Marshals Service rather than the US Army’s Military Police as host for the SPFOR in order to avoid conflicts with the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids (albeit in principle more than in practice) the domestic use of the military as a law enforcement body.

“The USMS hybrid option … provides an important nondeployed mission for the force: augmenting state and local agencies, many of which currently suffer from severe personnel shortages,” states the report without explaining how the SPFOR could at once “augment” those under-manned agencies while at the same time being “augmented” by them if necessary.

That little lapse in logic is one of several indications that the report’s authors weren’t so much addressing a “problem” as making a case for a preordained “solution” — in this case, creating the vanguard of a militarized internal security force.

Building the SPFOR within the Marshals Service “would place it where its members can develop the needed skills under the hybrid staffing option,” summarizes the document. “Furthermore, the USMS has the broadest law enforcement mandate of any U.S. law enforcement agency…. [This model] provides significant domestic policing and homeland security benefits by providing thousands of additional police officers across the United States.” (Emphasis added.)

Back in 1961, the U.S. Government produced a document entitled “Freedom From War” that envisioned the creation of a globe-spanning United Nations “Peace Force” that would work in collaboration with a militarized “internal security” force in each country. Since that time, critics of the UN have anticipated the day when foreign “peacekeepers” would be assigned to police American streets and, if necessary, confiscate privately owned firearms.

While the monstrosity headquartered on the East River is a proper target of our scorn and hostility, the new RAND study underscores the fact that if “peacekeepers” end up patrolling American streets, they probably won’t be foreigners in blue berets, but homegrown jackboots commanded by Washington.

(My thanks to Jack Slater for tipping me about the RAND report.)

Potential use of the Homeland Terrorism Act of 2007

H.R. 1955: Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-1955

When this proposed bill was first brought to my attention I was immediately struck by the way it defines the activities of Amitai Etzioni, his Communitarian Network and all their affiliate groups, like COPS, the Mossad, the KGB, the EU, the European Court, the WTO, the CFR&TC, the PNAC, and the New Democrats, et. al. Now I've noticed others are realizing this Act can become a potential weapon against the globalist traitors operating inside the U.S. government.

From the text:

"2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change.

"`(3) HOMEGROWN TERRORISM- The term `homegrown terrorism' means the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.

"`(4) IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE- The term `ideologically based violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious, or social beliefs."

How I see this:

Amitai Etzioni promotes an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious and social change. His "idea" for creating a whole new police force is called "Community Policing." Etzioni's friendly neighborhood "problem oriented policing" uses Israeli-KGB trained SWAT cops to enforce communitarian behavior laws. Crime prevention programs ( including HUD's Weed & Seed) target individual citizens for removal from the community. Perfected in low-income and HUD neighborhoods, this scanning and analysis based program gathers "annecdotal data" during informal "knock-and-talk" interviews. This data is entered into a GIS mapping program that merges it will all other "known"data and performs, among other things, "potential for crime analysis." Community cops across the globe are members of neighborhood watch groups and community development associations... their primary purpose is to "teach" local officials how to incorporate the new principles for protecting the quality of life in the community, and then help to enforce the vision.

(It's no coincidence that Brad Pitt is following Angelina Jolie's lead into promoting the UN vision in New Orleans. Why should the former residents of NO give a hoot about Brad's "vision" for rebuilding their city? Come on, is it really Brad's vision, or does it follow UN Local Agenda 21?)

Best use abatements, public nusiance abatements, revisions to noise regulations, landlord training acts, public health warrants, entry orders, ABCD interviews, and knock-and-talks are all communitarian programs that violate the 4th and 5th Amendment Rights of U.S. state citizens. (Yet the U.S. federal courts are upholding these new property takings and privacy invasion actions by "local" police. According to them, the Bill of Rights must be "balanced." )

We have confirmed that Etzioni's Hegelian Ideas have terrorized countless innocent Americans (and Iraqis). If this legislation passes the U.S. Senate, Americans could have just the tool we need to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES against the real terrorists in our midst. The COMPASS program violates the entire Privacy Act of 1974. The ones who are changing our justice system into a communitarian police state are verifiably terrorists, and if we don't do something to put a crimp in their plans pretty damn quick, many of our people will lose everything.

Speaking of legal actions... We the People and Bob Schultz are on the U.S. Supreme Court docket. Anyone who hasn't read their Petitions for Redress of Grievances is missing out.