Showing posts with label 9/11 official conspiracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 9/11 official conspiracy. Show all posts

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Jesse Ventura's Censored 9/11 Commentary

Since we're on the subject of conspiracy theories again (:{)}%?, I found this on a forum at prisonplanet where someone linked to the ACL. I didn't know Jesse Ventura has a tv show called Conspiracy Theory and that Alex Jones is an adviser! I have to say this is a fairly good overview of the dispute of the official 9/11 story, from what I've read, but I'm certainly not an expert on this. It just drives home how far removed I really am from what's happening in my country because I don't watch tv. I think I might like his show, in spite of the disinformation experts on the staff. Be kinda fun to see what they don't talk about on it, to watch how Jones is teaching Ventura to mix facts with fiction. Jones is the expert at diverting attention from specific, crucial community programs to the vague COMING POLICE STATE!!!! OMFG! Get your gun! :)
Jesse Ventura's Censored 9/11 Commentary
By Jesse Ventura
Sunday, March 14, 2010 at 01:08 PM
http://watchingthewatchers.org/news/2247/jesse-venturas-censored-911-commentary

Editor's Note: The following column by former Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura was removed by Huffington Post after it was published March 9 and replaced with a note that states the site "prohibits the promotion and promulgation of conspiracy theories -- including those about 9/11." {Niki's note: Yet Huffington Post publishes Etzioni, who promotes his bizarre theory!}

You didn't see anything about it in the mainstream media, but at a recent conference in San Francisco, more than 1,000 architects and engineers signed a petition demanding that Congress begin a new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9-11.

That's right, these people put their reputations in potential jeopardy -- because they don't buy the government's version of events. They want to know how 200,000 tons of steel disintegrated and fell to the ground in 11 seconds. They question whether the hijacked planes were responsible or whether it could have been a controlled demolition from inside that brought down the twin towers and WTC Building 7.

Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects and the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, put it like this: "The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and National Institute of Standards and Technology [NIST] reports provide insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers' destruction."

He's especially disturbed by Building 7, whose 47 stories came down in "pure free-fall acceleration" that afternoon, even though it was never hit by an aircraft. This is a subject I take up in my new book, American Conspiracies, published by Skyhorse. An excerpt follows: Some people have argued that the twin towers went down, within a half hour of one another, because of the way they were constructed. Well, those 425,000 cubic yards of concrete and 200,000 tons of steel were designed to hold up against a Boeing 707, the largest plane built at the time the towers were completed in 1973. Analysis had shown that a 707 traveling at 600 miles an hour (and those had four engines) would not cause major damage. The twin-engine Boeing 757s that hit on 9-11 were going 440 and 550 mph.

Still, we are told that a molten, highly intense fuel mixture from the planes brought down these two steel-framed skyscrapers. Keep in mind that no other such skyscraper in history had ever been known to collapse completely due to fire damage. So could it actually have been the result of a controlled demolition from inside the buildings?

I don't claim expertise about this, but I did work four years as part of the Navy's underwater demolition teams, where we were trained to blow things to hell and high water. And my staff talked at some length with a prominent physicist, Steven E. Jones, who says that a "gravity driven collapse" without demolition charges defies the laws of physics.

These buildings fell, at nearly the rate of free-fall, straight down into their own footprint, in approximately 10 seconds. An object dropped from the roof of the 110-story-tall towers would reach the ground in about 9.2 seconds. Then there's the fact that steel beams that weighed as much as 200,000 pounds got tossed laterally as far as 500 feet.

NIST started its investigation on Aug. 21, 2002. When their 10,000-page-long report came out three years later, the spokesman said there was no evidence to suggest a controlled demolition. But Jones also says that molten metal found underground weeks later is proof that jet fuel couldn't have been all that was responsible. I visited the site about three weeks after 9-11, with Gov. Pataki and my wife Terry. It didn't mean anything to me at the time, but they had to suspend digging that day because they were running into heat pockets of huge temperatures. These fires kept burning for more than three months, the longest-burning structure blaze ever.

And this was all due to jet fuel? We're talking molten metal more than 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Probably the most conclusive evidence about a controlled demolition is a research paper (two years, nine authors) published in the peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal in April 2009. In studying dust samples from the site, these scientists found chips of nano-thermite, which is a high-tech incendiary/explosive. Here's what the paper's lead author, Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen's chemistry department, had to say about the explosive that he's convinced brought down the twin towers and the nearby Building 7:

"Thermite itself dates back to 1893. It is a mixture of aluminum and rust powder, which react to create intense heat. The reaction produces iron, heated to 2,500 degrees Centigrade [4,532 degrees Fahrenheit]. This can be used to do welding. It can also be used to melt other iron. So in nano-thermite, this powder from 1893 is reduced to tiny particles, perfectly mixed. When these react, the intense heat develops much more quickly. Nano-thermite can be mixed with additives to give off intense heat, or serve as a very effective explosive. It contains more energy than dynamite, and can be used as rocket fuel."

Gage is one of hundreds of credentialed architects and structural engineers who have put their careers on the line to point out the detailed anomalies and many implications of controlled demolition in the building collapses. As he puts it bluntly: "Once you get to the science, it's indisputable."

A former Navy Seal, professional wrestler and actor Jesse Ventura was elected governor of Minnesota on the Reform Party ticket in 1998 where he served until 2002. Today, Ventura is best known for hosting the popular television show Conspiracy Theory, which airs on cable television. He is also the author of five books.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Scientists discover active Thermitic Material in WTC Dust

From Peter Myer's elist:
(1) Scientists discover active Thermitic Material in WTC Dust

From: David West <dgwest7@gmail.com> Date: 07.04.2009 09:55 PM

SCHOLARS FOR 9/11 TRUTH & JUSTICE NEWSLETTER
www.STJ911.org
April, 2009

Dear Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice,

We are very proud to make the announcement this month of a ground-breaking new paper just published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal and authored by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen. The paper is the long-awaited formal publication of the findings of red/grey chips in the WTC dust, which Steven Jones first presented in 2007 in Boston, and details the extensive analyses conducted to conclude with the finding of active thermitic material in the dust.

Additionally, Jim Hoffman has written two essays to help non-scientists understand the findings in the paper, and one essay describing a hypothetical scenario.

Congratulations to all who helped make this happen!

We urge members to help spread the word about this paper.

A press release is now posted on the STJ site which can be distributed to your local news outlets, or write your own article or announcement and email it to your lists. Sending the paper along to any scientists, architects, engineers or others at universities is also important.

This month’s newsletter also includes a few other updates on other work being done by our members.

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice now has over 700 members and is continuing to grow every day with increasing numbers of prominent people signing onto the challenges to the official story of 9/11/01. ==

Press Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Victoria Ashley, STJ911 committee member
Phone: 510-769-5109
Site: www.STJ911.org
Email: stj911@gmail.com

Scientists Discover Active Thermitic Material in WTC Dust

Berkeley, CA, April 3, 2009 -- A new study by independent scientists and researchers suggests the cause behind the catastrophic destruction of World Trade Center Towers on September 11th can be seen in the dust itself: active thermitic material, a highly engineered explosive.

The study, published today in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, describes a finding of "red/gray bi-layered chips" in samples of dust taken from vicinity of the World Trade Center following its destruction. Using tools such as a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and x-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS) to analyze the material, the study authors concluded that, "the red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic."

The study's finding lends new support to the demolition theory put forth by critics of the official reports.

At a time when the American public is finding it difficult to understand the full story behind the current economic crisis, findings of a demolition raise new questions about how the 'War on Terror' -- an enormous source of recent American spending -- was started.

Officials with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), charged with establishing the cause of the buildings' destruction, have stated that they "did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel," and that thermite, "or another incendiary compound," would be too difficult to have placed in the buildings without notice.

NIST has stated that such difficulties make demolition unlikely. They concluded that aircraft impacts and the subsequent fires led to the building failures.

Dr. Steven Jones, physicist and author on the paper, says that NIST has refused to test the dust for thermite, super-thermite, or any other accelerant or explosive.

"We've repeatedly asked them to follow standard investigative procedure, to perform these tests and release the results. They haven't."

Jones says such tests may be required by fire protection codes.

Kevin Ryan, chemist and co-author on the paper, explained why he thinks NIST is wrong. "What we've discovered is not conventional thermite -- which is what NIST continues to refer to -- but a highly engineered thermitic material, or 'super thermite', probably designed for just this type of application."

Pre-planned demolition, supporters say, is the 'best-fit' model for the many unusual and unexplained characteristics of the building failures, such as the speed and symmetry of the collapses, and the extreme pulverization of the materials leading to clouds of micron-sized dust particles, described in one insurance report as behaving similar to a "volcanic eruption".

"One of the unusual features that piqued my interest," Jones said, "was the pools of molten metal seen in all three rubble piles, WTC 1, 2 & 7."

NIST officials have published a response stating that the condition of the steel was "irrelevant to the investigation of the collapse."

Jones, formerly a Professor of Physics with Brigham Young University and known for his work in muon-catalyzed fusion, published in Nature, Scientific American, and the Journal of Physical Chemistry, began researching the 9/11/01 attacks in 2005.

Jones discovered the curious thermitic material in 2007, when he ran a magnet over a dust sample given to him by a Manhattan resident survivor of the attack, and found that some particles were attracted to the magnet.

"That was very odd to me," he said.

Those particles turned out to be iron-rich microspheres, partially described in a 2001 USGS study of the dust.

But to fully analyze, describe and report on the thermitic material would take longer.

Jones was joined in that effort by several others including Dr. Niels Harrit, a chemistry professor with the University of Copenhagen for over 30 years and author of numerous research papers in journals such as Nano Letters, the Journal of the American Chemistry Society, and the Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

Harrit says that he is frequently asked why he researches the September 11th attack. and says has two answers.

"First, I am opposed to crime, and second, when my 6 grandchildren ask me, 'Grandfather, which side were you on?' I will be able to answer them, 'I was on your side'."

Co-author Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, a materials scientist and Director of the TEM (Transmition Electron Microscopy) laboratory at BYU, says he hopes the paper will "change the way the 9/11 truth movement is viewed by the mainstream public and media."

And chemist and co-author Kevin Ryan, a former Underwriters Laboratories manager, challenged the NIST report in public statements in 2004, and was consequently fired.

"This finding really goes beyond anything that has previously been shown," says Jones. "We had to use sophisticated tools to analyze the dust because this isn't just a typical explosive, RDX or CD4 or something -- this is a highly engineered material not readily available to just anyone."

In a 2006 interview with Deseret News, Jones noted that commercial explosives must contain tag elements for traceability, but that no law requires tagging of advanced forms of thermitics.

In 2008, several of these authors published three articles challenging the official reports in US scientific journals, The Open Civil Engineering Journal, The Environmentalist, and The Journal of Engineering Mechanics Dozens of other papers making similar challenges have been published in the sister publication of the Scholars group, The Journal of 9/11 Studies

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization of over 700 independent researchers analyzing the September 11, 2001 attacks with a strong emphasis on the scientific method.
For information: http://www.stj911.com or
Contact: stj911@gmail.com
Phone: 510-769-5109 # # #

Thursday, September 11, 2008

NYC mayor seeks more sway over Ground Zero, Reuters

NYC mayor seeks more sway over Ground Zero
Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:58am ED

By Joan Gralla

NEW YORK (Reuters) - New York City should get more control over Ground Zero's long-delayed rebuilding by abolishing a state agency, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said on Wednesday, a day before the seventh anniversary of the September 11, 2001, attacks.

Bloomberg, who said the memorial to the nearly 3,000 people who died in the attacks on the twin towers of the World Trade Center must open by the 10th anniversary of the attacks, also recommended scaling back the site's transit hub.

Bloomberg, an independent, urged the state to dismantle the Lower Manhattan Development Corp, which parceled out billions of dollars of federal rebuilding aid. The state agency's record has been marred by its oversight of the demolition of the Deutsche Bank building. Last summer, two firefighters died there in a blaze being probed by the New York district attorney.

"The multiple layers of authority between the federal, state and city and the private sector just keeps getting in the way," Bloomberg told reporters at a ceremony where he signed one of the first steel beams for the memorial.


Many leftist challengers to the official 9/11 conspiracy theory promote the idea that the attacks were an inside, "neo-conservative" job. If the PNAC is supposed to be so neo-conservative, why was former communist/terrorist anti-war protestor/SDS Herr Doktor Amitai Etzioni listed as endorsing the PNAC war projects? Why don't the 9/11 researchers talk about Etzioni's literary or policy contributions to the overall plan for "US world dominance?" What does Etzioni mean when he says "the world needs a new global architecture?"
"They believe a group of US neo-conservatives called the Project for a New American Century, set on US world dominance, orchestrated the 9/11 attacks as an excuse to hit Iraq, Afghanistan and later Iran." http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-403757/Fury-academics-claim-9-11-inside-job.html


In other UK news, it's been
Revealed: Sarah Palin's ancestors came from Norfolk

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 2:29 PM on 11th September 2008

US presidential race hopeful Sarah Palin can trace her family tree back to 18th century Norfolk.

Historians have revealed that Mrs Palin ancestors emigrated from the East Anglia county.

According to family tree website ancestry.co.uk the vice-presidential candidate's great, great, great, great, great grandfather Robert Gower was baptised in Norwich in 1723.

Gower is responsible for taking the family on the perilous journey across the Atlantic to begin a new life in America.

Sarah Palin's relatives came from Norfolk, the same county as Steve Coogan's fictional character Alan Partridge

Research using births, marriage and death records show Gower, who is from Mrs Palin's mother's side, left Norfolk for America in the 18th century and had a son James, her great, great, great, great grandfather, who was born in Maine.

Other American politicians to have roots across the Atlantic include:

* Barack Obama's great-great-great grandfather Falmouth Kearney was a simple farmer from Moneygall, County Offaly in Ireland. In 1850, Mr Kearney left Ireland to escape the potato famine, sailing from Liverpool, England, on the S.S. Marmion bound for America.

* George W. Bush has royal lineage with links to the Spencer family that produced Diana, Princess of Wales - it makes him the 17th cousin to Prince William of Wales. Mr Bush is also linked to Sir Winston Churchill through three relatives, the Coes of New York, the Sumners of Massachusetts and the Shermans of Rhode Island.

* Bill Clinton has even bluer blood. His ancestry can be traced back, on his mother's side, to King Henry III who ruled England from 1227 to 1272. He is also related to several medieval monarchs and Simon de Montfort, a statesman and solider under King Henry III.

So why did Mrs Palin's ancestors leave Norfolk?

Susan Maddock, principal archivist at the Norfolk Record Office, said: 'Unlike the 17th century and, to some extent, the 19th century, there is no particular theme of why people moved to America.

Hunsett Mill, along River Ant, Norfolk.

Norfolk roots: Sarah Palin's great, great, great, great, great grandfather Robert Gower grew up in the beautiful countryside of Norfolk

'In the late 16th and 17th centuries it was due to religious freedom, while in the 19th century a lot of paupers went to America, some people were transported there for their crimes while others wanted to better themselves.'

Ms Maddock said during the 18th century people also moved to America to administer or run the colonial government.

'But there was nothing pressing in the 18th century, no particular reason why they might have gone when compared to the 17th or 19th centuries.'

She said Norfolk was one of the most populous places in Britain before the industrial revolution.

'And also being a coastal county, it was more likely that people would travel by sea and meet people from abroad and be inspired to travel.'

Atlantic voyage: Barack Obama's family tree can be traced back to Ireland, while Bill Clinton and George W. Bush can both boast British royal lineage

As well as the Norfolk connection, the governor of Alaska also has roots from across Europe, with two maternal great grandparents born in Germany - Mary Scholmtz, born in Frankfurt in 1860, and Charles Mueller, who travelled to the USA with his wife.

Mrs Palin is not Norfolk's only link with American presidents.

Abraham Lincoln's connection to Hingham is well known, with the president being the great, great, great, great grandson of Samuel Lincoln, servant of Francis and Liddia Laives, who left England in April 1637, arriving at Boston two months later.

Mrs Palin, a mother of five who has been married for 20 years, caused a stir when she was announced as running mate for John McCain.

She has scarcely been out of the news since.

The 44-year-old, dubbed a 'pitbull in lipstick' will become the first female US vice-president if the Republicans win the election in November.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Pakistan Daily News reports US Military Officers Challenge 9/11 Story

Pete sent me this gullibility factor test for fun. http://www.naturalnews.com/gullibility.html
Yay me, I got a 94. I missed the Vitamin E and the cancer questions. The results remind me of my horrorscope.
Your GF score is 94.
(Out of a range of 0 - 100, where 0 = mind slave, and 100 = free thinker.)

Mind slave

Free thinker
0
(You) 100

Free Thinker

Welcome to the top 5%. You're a true free thinker and a person who is well informed about the reality in which you live. Although you may have been easily manipulated earlier in life, you eventually gained lucidity and developed a healthy sense of skepticism that you now automatically apply to your observations and experiences. You are endlessly curious about human behavior and the nature of the universe, and you have one or more lifestyle habits that most people would consider odd or unusual. You are not only of very high intelligence, you are also extremely creative in one or more areas (music, art, software development, inventing, etc.)

If you were in The Matrix, you would have taken the red pill, completed the combat training, and started fighting (and beating) agents from day one.

Your architects: You have cast off reality distortions taught to you by your parents, schooling, corporate advertising and government propaganda. You create your own beliefs based on what serves you best, without much regard for what the rest of the crowd is doing. You are guided by your own internal code of ethics (which may or may not agree with politically-correct ethical codes) rather than any pre-set system of ethics (such as from any one religion).

I don't know who Lisa Long is but she started sending me her news emails a couple years ago. Many of her stories seem to promote the left side of the dialectic so I don't read her emails very often. Actually I haven't had time to read up on any current news, because I guess in some way I've been taking a break from a constant barrage of disinformation. But tonight I opened a few elist mails and found this:

USA Military Officers Challenge Official Account of September 11


More here:
http://www.daily.pk/world/americas/99-americas/3865-usa-military-officers-challenge-official
-account-of-september-11.html

I'm one of those Americans who never believed the officially sanctioned conspiracy theory of what took place on September 11. It later freaked me out when I saw that the Patriot Act included things I'd read in the Joint Dod/DoJ Technology Report of 1999, but I didn't pursue it as a focus of ACL research because I don't know enough about buildings and demolitions to make any valid scientific observations. Plus it's always looked to me like some very fine researchers were doing the best possible job already.

Wouldn't it be great if these brave soldiers were able to instigate a Congressional investigation and not end up like Hitler's generals who resisted his final solution? Or, since the ultimate goal is the establishment of a all-powerful world government, is it possible that 9-11 was botched purposefully and obviously so that we would never believe it and as a result lose faith in our system of government entirely and be more apt to accept the Hague as the supreme global communitarian court of law? Too many 9-11 "truthers" want to take Bush and Cheney before the International Court. What will these military officers do when Congress refuses their petition? Is there a higher authority who has the power to redress their grievances? Taking the highest elected U.S. officials before the world court is the communitarians best possible scenario, one that would give the U.N. the credibility it needs before it can enforce all of the objectives outlined in Agenda 21.

One of the only things I ever asked my dad was about how our skies could have possibly been so defenseless for so long. I wanted to know what the old sarge thought happened to our air defenses. (I also asked him about the trillions missing from DoD and why foreign airplanes had to patrol our airspace after the attacks and before we knew for sure who did it.)

The first officer cited, Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, joined the ACL group at leftrightunite, and I think he was on my friends list too, but I don't know him. It's also pretty interesting that Alex Jones made his way into this Pakistani news story.

Just recently I read that the airport security in Boston was subcontracted to an Israeli company, but I haven't checked that for myself.

Lisa also forwarded this story " Israel PM calls for naval blockade of Iran" .

From Peter Myers' elist I got this: The Coming World Government is Announced by the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute

And, man, what happened to these guys? Fourth Right Foot Found

We the People Foundation have taken up Ron Paul's Revolution:
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/Update/Update2008-05-22.htm