Saturday, May 15, 2010

WISE guys and gals

seven new mouths to feed
Osa is a very good mommy!
one of the 2 pups that resemble daddy

Spent the past week learning (what little there is) about our Community Revenue Sharing program, after the Kenny Lake Community League rejected my proposal last Tuesday to upgrade kennylake.com to include a community toolbox, classifieds and visitor information.

Billy Williams, owner of Grizzly Pizza, member of the Copper Valley Chamber of Commerce, said the Chamber should be the one building the website for the community. Williams has received $16,500 for his Tonsina Agricultural Project over the past 4 years (The Chamber of Commerce got $3000 in 2009 - what did they do with that money I wonder.)
http://www.alaskaconservationdistricts.org/programs/agriculture.htm

Paul Boos (the same WISE guy who wrote the snarky editiorial about me in the local paper last December) wondered at my "credentials." Yet it was his girlfriend, Janele Eklund, the president of WISE, who tried to enlist me to work on WISE's website after I finished kennylake.com for her buddy Sharon Forster in 2007. I told them then I don't work for communitarian non-profits.

My proposal was the only one rejected by the group. I sent an email complaint on Wednesday to the State of Alaska but the office hasn't responded.

I learned about this revenue sharing program 2 days before the dispersal meeting from a neighbor who brought me a copy of the notice in the CRR. He later emailed me a copy of his letter to the governor and the attorney general for the State of Alaska. I don't think anyone's responded to him yet either. His reference to "conspiracy theory nonsense" is directed at me and my work, and while it distances his complaint from people like me who are vilified for spending thousands of volunteer hours researching these groups, it also shows the level of arrogance and ignorance our most educated people must use to communicate with government officials.
As of Sunday, 9 May, I was informed that a revenue sharing meeting was scheduled for Tuesday, 11 May. I checked the two most prominent bulletin boards in Kenny Lake for further information. These were the community well and Wenger's Country Store which is the largest business in the area and has a large bulletin board. No mention on either. I contacted Tara Jollie at Community Regional Affairs Sunday regarding this on via email.

I was under the impression that State of Alaska regulations required posting a notice in three prominent locations three days prior to the meeting.

On Monday, I rode my bicycle to the other store, Kenny Lake Merchantile, and to the Golden Spruce Expresso to check for postings. None were posted and the owner of Golden Spruce told me no notice had been posted. Again on Monday,10 May, I again contacted Tara Jollie via email.

I have found notice in the local paper that I had to purchase. I was dismayed to see that the notice had the following prerequisite: Public-serving organizations please bring your requests at that time. There is a simple application process for these state funds. Recieving orgs do not
have to be 501c, but funds must serve a public need. The role of the League is to distribute the funds and report to the State what the funds were used for.

On the surface, this procedure appears innocuous. However, careful reading of this will reveal that only organizations be afforded any opportunity to request funding.

As of Monday evening, I was informed that the Kenny Lake Community League maintained an limitted email list and those who desired notification of the meeting recieved such. Those who neither have email or are unwilling to share their email addresses were not notified of the meeting.

It would appear that the notification of this meeting was outside of the regulations and there is a concerted effort to deny the public process. In the same newspaper, Copper River Record, 6 May 2010, on page 16, Gay Wellman has been extensively involved with a select group of local
organizations: President of the Kenny Lake Community League, Chairman of the Kenny Lake Library, founder and board member of the Wrangell Institute for Science and Environment, active member of the Copper Country Alliance and the Wellwood Council.

I'm not prone to conspiracy theory nonsense, but the lack of public notification for the meeting coupled with heavy involvement by Ms Wellman in select organizations could certainly be fodder for the conspiracy theorists.

When the affiliations by the other members of the Kenny Lake Community League board are factored in, the conspiracy theorists got my attention.

With our declining local, state and national economy, I would hope that the community prioritized any revenue sharing monies by placing the most essential services foremost. I have no dogs in this fight. I am subscribed to the Kenny Lake Community Well and I donate money to the library. I contend that the community decides where to distribute the funds, not the organizations.

I'm appealing to your administration to force the Kenny Lake Community League to follow the public process for the determination of revenue sharing disbursement. With the economic environment hitting every family across the nation and more specifically locally, any fuel added to the conspiracy theory arguments can't and won't come to any good. The people must have confidence in the public process. No matter what may come, as long as the people are notdisenfranchised, we can solve our problems as a community working together."
I checked into this and was told by the newly elected League treasurer (also the Merc owner) that anyone could apply for the money and we didn't need to be a 501c to qualify. My proposal was short and I emailed it to the president of the league a couple hours prior to the meeting. Gay Wellman's response email expressed how sorry she was that I didn't get my request, but that her and her WISE guy husband think I should build a website for the Community League (and she plans to bring that issue up at the next Board meeting on May 18).

Yesterday I got hard copies of the league's records from the treasurer back to 2007-8, (no idea when the program began) and it was no surprise to me to see that WISE has received a payment every year for the last four years. Most of the money went to legitimate community needs, (sort of anyway, I really don't see what $4000 to paint the library will do to help this community). But why is WISE such a high priority every year? They're number 5 on the list of beneficiaries, ranking above the EMS program and well above all the school sports programs. And now the WISE guys slipped a new idea into the budget; in addition to the Wellman's $4000 for WISE this year, the Wellman's Willow Creek Watershed Consortium got another $4500. The Wellmans received 15% of our community money this year, yet nothing they do benefits the community I live in, and it can be argued that what they do actually detracts from our community's economic base. Our community is very dependent on tourism and almost every roadside business needs tourist money to survive the winter. What kind of system pays for one family's tourist business and leaves every other tourist business to compete against the funded "favored" businesses?

The President of WISE, Janele Eklund, owns a tourism company called Copper River Country Tours which STARTS and ENDS its tours at the COPPER RIVER PRINCESS LODGE! Their website explains: "Copper River Country Nature Tours is featured on www.visitwildalaska.com and is a proud member of the Alaska Wilderness Recreation & Tourism Association, Alaska's leader in eco tourism and sustainable travel with a commitment to environmental protection and wildlife conservation." What is AWRTA? They're our "collective voice."
"The Alaska Wilderness Recreation & Tourism Association (AWRTA) is a members-driven trade association formed to be a collective voice for wilderness-dependent businesses. We advocate for the sustainability of Alaska's natural and cultural resources, responsible tourism and tourism planning for communities. View AWRTA's Ecotourism Guidelines to learn more. "
These are also the same WISE guys making the Copper River Country Stories Map, a tourist map that does not include ANY tourist businesses (besides theirs) out here. As is par for the course, they claim to be in a partnership with my community and claim they want our stories in their map. When I made the point that a map that doesn't show the tourists where gas, food and lodging is will not help the local tourist businesses, I was called a "conspiracy theorist." heh.

In the May 6 issue of the Copper River Record, Arlene Rosenkrans (DOA) wrote a glowing article about Gay Wellman being honored with the 2009 Donna Tollman Award. Arlene wrote:
"Gay serves as President of the Kenny Lake Community League and Chairman of the Kenny Lake Library Board. She is a founder and board member of Wrangell Institute for Science and Environment (WISE), which partners with CDVA (Copper Valley Development Association) on trail projects and environmental education programs. She is also an active member of Copper Country Alliance and the Wellwood Council and past president of the Kenny Lake School PTO. As a skilled group facilitator, she excels in bringing divergent peoples and opinions together to solve complex issues, bridging people, organizations and communities.

She and her husband David are local small business owners of the Wellwood B&B and share their home and community with visitors from around the world. They are willing sponsors and volunteers on many projects and events throughout the community. Every summer, the Wellman's host a One World Camp on their land, and camp attendees participate in a service project." (page 6, top half)
I can't find anything on the Wellwood Council. Nobody's heard of it. The Copper Country Alliance is connected to the big international ecotrust/ Copper River Watershed Project to establish a Citizen's Oversight of the Trans Alaska Pipeline (TAPS). One thing is certain, Gay Wellman is a "skilled group facilitator" who has no problem approving community funding for her privately owned "small business". Their One World Camp is probably connected to their School of the Earth, and it's interesting that Arlene left SoE off Gay's list of associations out here.

OhConsuelo sent me a link to Erica Carle's latest nwvs article on game theory, which is the link above to "skilled group facilitator." I found this article in their archives:

THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
IT'S POWER AND GOALS

By Erica Carle
June 5, 2002
NewsWithViews.com

Most people, including Chamber Of Commerce members, would be astonished to learn the extent of power that organization exerts over international , national, state and local policies. It is common knowledge that the Chamber has lobbyists in Washington and state legislatures, and that it is active in local communities. These activities are no secret. They can be noticed by the casual observer, and are expected by members. But there is a great deal more which must be understood in order to gain a concept of the real power of the Chamber of Commerce -- not only over commerce, education, religion, technology, industry, agriculture, transportation, medicine, communication, labor and government. To understand this power we have to look beyond the local communities to the Chamber's national and international activities, and to Chamber ties with other organizations, both governmental and non-governmental.

The Chamber Is Many Organizations

The Chamber of Commerce is not one, but many organizations. There are local Chambers of Commerce in thousands of communities. These are blanketed by the United States Chamber of Commerce, and since 1920, an International Chamber of Commerce. Once the United States Chamber of Commerce was set up, individual Chambers of Commerce all over the country were invited to join and allowed it to represent and inform them. Such invitations are usually eagerly accepted. No one likes to be left out, and most people like to feel they are part of a big, important group. Local Chambers joined, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce leaders were able to claim the right to make policy for many individual Chambers.

Gaining Power

The U.S. Chamber leaders suggested they had answers to many problems, the most important being the final answer to the problem of war. There is an almost-universal yearning for peace, so that was taken as good news. The home town folks knew they could not solve the problem, or enforce a universal acceptance. How wonderful, they thought, to be associated with those who claimed they could. (It often seems that the farther away from home policies are set on difficult problems, the easier it is to assume that those who are making decisions have all the right answers.) Home town common sense was abandoned for the sake of an unsupported philosophical dream.

The leaders of the U.S. and International Chambers must have known, even as they made the promise, that they did not have the ability to deliver on it, but they also knew that the mere promise would give them a hold on the emotions of many members of local and national Chambers, and of others who believed in universal solutions.

Another problem Chamber leaders claimed to be able to solve was that of hunger and poverty worldwide. The Chamber had one answer to both problems: "rational" world trade. Allow the trade of the whole world to be carried on under the Chamber's "rational" direction, rather than independently under the supervision of various governments; and the world's two most pressing problems would be solved. Two slogans were popularized in order to gain backing for Chamber leadership: "World peace through world trade," and "More business in government and less government in business."

A New Organization

The Chamber sought to commercialize the world under its own direction. To do this it needed to find ways to affect and bypass operating policies of various states and nations. To change national policies, and even laws, required popular support and collective action. An new type of blanket organization was needed, one that could blanket not only governments, but professions, unions, educational institutions, farms, industries, sciences, religions and even families. An organization was sought which could bring about the cooperation and commercialization of all of these. A strong controllable international blanket organization was needed.

Coalition For Change

By the 1930's plans for the new blanket organization to serve the Chamber's purposes, the United Nations, were already well under way. The Chamber had the cooperation of tax-exempt foundations, some of which, such as the Carnegie Foundation for International Peace and the Rockefeller Foundation, had been set up early in the century. Large banks and trusts could see future profits for themselves if they cooperated with the Chamber; and the cooperation of international corporations was assumed, especially since Thomas J. Watson, President of International Business Machines (IBM) was President of the International Chamber of Commerce and a trustee of the Carnegie Foundation for International Peace. University cooperation was no problem because there were many close ties, financial and otherwise, between the above groups and universities such as Harvard, Columbia, etc. University policy planners, economists, and sociologists were also eager to extend their influences and enlarge their campuses.

Wartime Planning

World War II aided, rather than hindered efforts to establish a "national" international commercial system. Chamber representatives from countries on both sides met and planned throughout the war. They were deciding how the world's resources ought to be controlled and divided after the shooting was over, and how to set up the United Nations. The United Nations organization could be used to gain governments' compliance with the Chamber's plans for a unified, controlled world economy, and also the cooperation of various non-governmental organizations.

The Organization Is Born

After the war was over, the system was ready to be put into operation. Through the efforts of the Chamber coalition the United Nations was born. And through the United Nations, the Chamber gained for the first time in history, a permanent vehicle for prescribing policy for governments. It is a crushing dominating type of power.

Economic And Social Council

How could the United Nations be used to increase Chamber of Commerce power and help the Chamber throw its blanket over other activities? It was done largely through what the Chamber regarded as the most important element in the United Nations Charter: the setting up of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). Such a council was the one thing that had been lacking in the old League of Nations. But when the United Nations was set up, the Economic and Social Council opened the way for the Chamber to have direct and continuous influence upon international affairs, even though it was a non-governmental organization. The Economic and Social Council was placed beside the Security Council. George L. Ridgeway said in his Merchants of Peace: "...The world of economic and social enlightenment beside the world of force..." The important thing about the Economic and Social Council was that it made provision to include representatives from non-governmental organizations in its discussions. The Chamber of Commerce was immediately included as one of the most important advisory organizations.

Chamber Power With ECOSOC

With the birth of the United Nations, the Chamber had a vehicle subject to its influence, which could gather under its blanket not only governmental, but all types of professional and other non-governmental organizations. This put the Chamber of Commerce at the center of policy making for every governmental and non-governmental organization that is in any way associated with, or dominated by the United Nations.

Including representatives from non-governmental organizations in its deliberations may seem on the surface to be a way for the Economic and Social Council to learn the needs and wishes of the people, and to allow them to participate in policymaking decisions., but this is not the case. What most people do not understand is that the United Nations is not an open forum, offering opportunities for unlimited discussion on public matters. It is a goal-centered vehicle, dedicated to accomplishing the purpose for which it was founded: that of putting control of all the world's political, social and economic activities under one Chamber of Commerce-dominated blanket.

Goal-Centering Means Behavior Controlling

Because the United Nations is goal-centered, it is also a behavior controlling organization. Chamber coalition leaders know that those who set the goals for others control the behavior of others. Those who participate in the United Nations must support UN goals. Participants must dedicate themselves, their efforts, their personalities, and their resources to the United Nations. They must give up their individuality. The United Nations does not exist for the sake of individuals. From the United Nations point of view, individuals and groups exist for the sake of the United Nations. It is an organization of organizations, dealing only with groups. It works through groups - those groups which gain consultative status and which are recognized as worthy of participation in the Economic and Social Council.

Consultative Status

To gain consultative status with the Economic and Social Council organizations must:

1) Make application to the Economic and Social Council's Committee on Non-governmental Organizations.

2) Be willing to submit reports on its own operations and activities to the Economic and Social Council on a regular basis.

3) Be eligible for one of the categories set up for participation.

Categories Of Participation

Non-governmental organizations having consultative status with the Economic and Social Council are divided into three classifications:

Category I is for those organizations, such as the International Chamber of Commerce, that are closely involved in the economic and social life of the areas they represent, and which are said to have marked and sustained contributions to make to the achievements and objectives of the United Nations.

Category II is for those organizations, internationally known, having special competence in and specifically concerned with only a few of the fields of activity covered by the Council.

The Roster is for those organizations able to make occasional and useful contributions to the Council's work. In 1979, the most recent edition of the United Nations Yearbook which is available , 30 international organizations were listed in Category l; 206 organizations were listed in Category ll, and 357 organzations were on the Roster.

Organizations Included

Some of the organizations having status with the Economic and Social Council are organizations which have been in existence long before the United Nations was born. Others seem to have been concocted for the purpose of organizing people to serve the United Nations. The following were listed in 1979 in Category l, the most important Category: International Alliance of Women - Equal Rights, Equal Responsibilities; International Association of French-Speaking Parliamentarians, International Chamber of Commerce, International Confederation of Free Trade Unions; International Cooperative Alliance; International Council of Voluntary Agencies; International Council of Women; International Council on Social Welfare, International Federation of Agricultural Producers; International Federation of Business and Professional Women; International Organization for Standardization; International Organization of Consumers Unions; International Organization of Employers; International Planned Planned Parenthood Federation; International Social Security Association; International Union of Local Authorities; International Youth and Student Movement for the United Nations; Inter-Parliamentary Union; League of Red Cross Societies; Muslim World League; Organization of African Trade Union Unity; United Towns Organization; Women's International Democratic Federation; World Assembly of Youth; World Confederation of Labor; World Federation of Democratic Youth; World Federation of Trade Unions; World Federation of United Nations Associations; World Muslim Congress; World Veterans Federation.

Indirect Influence

One of the advantages the Chamber of Commerce is able to realize through United Nations is the advantage of anonymity. Policies it promotes do not have to bear the Chamber of Commerce label. They can be presented to governments as United Nations' policies. When the United States and local Chambers of Commerce support these policies, few of the local Chambers or their members are aware of the vital links between the Chamber and the United Nations, or that much of the legislation United Nations representatives suggest to national and state legislatures was actually originally brought to the United Nations by the Chamber of Commerce. The steps in the process that can be followed are:

(1) Planners, perhaps at a university or Chamber-supported think tank, develop legislation.

(2) The Chamber of Commerce accepts the legislation as in keeping with its goals.

(3) The Chamber of Commerce suggests it to the Economic and Social Council.

(4) The Economic and Social Council promotes it through the United Nations.

(5) The United Nations pressures someone in each national or state government to introduce the legislation in that area's legislature.

(6) The United States Chamber (and Chambers in other countries) suggest and/or pressure local Chambers to support the legislation.

(7) The National League of Cities, National Municipal League, U.S. Conference of Mayors, Association of Counties, National Governors' Conference, International City Managers' Association, Advisory Commission on Inter-Governmental Relations, Urban Action Clearinghouse, International Labor Organization, etc....add their weight.

(8) Local Chamber officials get instruction on how to "educate" their members to favor the policy or legislation.

(9) Chambers' paid lobbyists pressure legislatures for passage.

(10) Local Chambers work in communities for more support.

(11) Federal legislation is passed.

(12) Enabling legislation at state and other levels is passed.

Few members of local Chambers are aware of any but the last three or four steps. Even among those who know that local Chambers take positions on legislation, there are few among the members who know what position the Chamber lobbyists actually take on specific legislation.

Chamber-Supported Legislation And Policies

The Chamber of Commerce and the Chamber coalition have supported much legislation which has not only been extremely costly, but which has served to transfer power, responsibility and resources from independent nations, local communities, local businesses, and private professions to the universal system coordinated by the Chamber of Commerce coalition. It has supported measures harmful to many of its own members. The following are some of the measures the Chamber of Commerce has supported to aid in the transfer of power from individuals and independent governments, groups, businesses and professions to the Chamber-advocated management system:

(1) Creation of the United Nations.

(2) Creation of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

(3) Regional government or "New Federalism."

(4) Medicare (Commercialization of medical professions.)

(5) Postal reorganization.

(6) Organized Crime Control Act.

(7) Contracting for school services with private industry.

(8) Voucher system for education.

(9) Management and human relations techniques for handling personnel in industry.

(10) Health care planning councils.

(11) Prepaid medical practice (HMOs).

(12) Federal land use planning.

(13) Federally-imposed career education.

(14) Equal Rights Amendment.

(15) Cross-town busing for desegregation.

These and many other measures have been, or will be, extremely costly. Yet, when the Chamber of Commerce calls for decreases in federal spending and speaks out about the costly federal bureaucracy, its sincerity is seldom questioned. Its goals and power are not well enough known and understood.

Use Of This Document

A single document, such as this, may not affect that Chamber of Commerce power, nor diminish the crushing effect of its system to a noticeable degree. But it may encourage some citizens, government officials, professionals, and perhaps even Chamber of Commerce members to look more closely, investigate more diligently, direct their own actions more intelligently, and respond more aggressively against efforts to diminish their personal responsibility and confound their independent judgment.

Major Sources:

Merchants of Peace - The History of the International Chamber of Commerce by George L. Ridgeway, Little Brown & Co., 1938, 1959. Washington Report - Weekly newsletter published by the Chamber of Commerce of the United States. Issues from 1968-79. Think - International Business Machines' in-house publication. Issues from 1937-1970. The United Nations Yearbook, 1979

© Erica Carle - All Rights Reserved


Erica Carle is an independent researcher and writer. She has a B.S. degree from the University of Wisconsin. She has been involved in radio and television writing and production, and has also taught math and composition at the private school her children attended in Brookfield, Wisconsin. For ten years she wrote a weekly column, "Truth In Education" for WISCONSIN REPORT, and served as Education Editor for that publication. Her books are available through Education Service Council, P. O. Box 271, Elm Grove, Wisconsin 53122.

GIVE US THE YOUNG--$5 Plus $2.00 P&H

WHY THINGS ARE THE WAY THEY ARE--$16 PLUS $4.00 P&H

BOTH BOOKS -- $25 Total E-Mail EricaCarle@aol.com
As they explain so perfectly at the AWRTA website:
To learn more about AWRTA's goals, the benefits of AWRTA membership, and how to become an AWRTA member, visit the About AWRTA page.

For detailed information on AWRTA membership and rates, please view the 2010 Membership Rates page or contact the AWRTA office.

All membership applications are subject to final review and approval by the AWRTA Board of Directors.
And in case we're still unclear on what types of businesses are promoted with state funding grants, rest assured ONLY ecotourism businesses will be featured in community marketing.
Plan Your Trip to Alaska

Plan your wilderness adventure trip or ecotourism vacation to Alaska by using our Visit Wild Alaska website (www.visitwildalaska.com) featuring AWRTA wilderness-dependent ecotourism businesses. You can search for businesses offering: natural history tours, rafting, fishing, kayaking, hiking, backpacking, wilderness lodges, hunting, and day ocean cruises & charters trips to Alaska's wild lands.

Explore Alaska with tourism businesses committed to Ecotourism Guidelines. Our members are committed to traveling with care and concern for protecting Alaska's environment and wilderness areas. Some of our members provide their customers an opportunity to directly contribute to efforts to protect & conserve Alaska's natural resources through our Dollars a Day for Conservation program.
"Adventure Green Alaska certifies Alaska tourism businesses that meet AGA standards for economic, environmental, and social sustainability. Administered by an independent Alaska nonprofit corporation, AGA encourages tourism businesses to use sustainable management practices and operations, thereby earning the right to use the AGA logo."


No wonder Patty Ryan's Golden Spruce Espresso and Cabins is still such a big secret. Like Camp Redington, they're not in the club. (Is the Wellwood Council the "secret" club?)

3 comments:

Louis Turner said...

I guess we can all thank G.W. Bush with his forked tongue that started a “Newspeak” position every time somebody uncovers a full-blown conspiracy. This way the average Sheep can go back to his beer and his Ballgame and Skull and Bones can take a breather:

"Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty." - G.W. Bush

the tent lady said...

Thanks for reminding me of that quote Louis, I remember when I first read it. I had the creepiest realization that this warning was tongue in cheek, because he could be exposing himself with these exact words but that's not how we're expected to hear it.

Who coined the word sheeple? I looked it up once but forgot. Was it Bill Cooper, do you know?

Louis Turner said...

I’m not too sure about the Sheeple quote. I have been saying it since 1998 when I saw it posted on a Pro-Gun site. It’s mostly a Biblical term used by folks in the Church and probably originated there. When I first saw your question tonight I almost sprayed coffee all over my Monitor! Hahaha.

I was in the process of posting my latest article:
POTUS Tarpanomics For Sheepling's - Satan's Wallet

As you can see I about hit the floor when I saw your quote:
“Tongue in cheek.” For this is what I wrote at the bottom of the article:
“We can’t say the word “George Bush” without using a wire brush to clean our tongues.
· We can’t say “Barack Obama” without throwing up!”