Abstract
Background: Communitarianism is the theory that individual rights must be balanced against the rights of the "community." Its many proponents insist that individual rights and liberties pose a real threat to the health and safety of the "community at large." The founders of the Communitarian Network began "shoring up the moral, social and political environment" in the early 1990s. Today the communitarian theory is the basis for hundreds of new global rules and regulations eliminating individual rights, yet fewer than one percent of the affected population knows about it.
Results: The progression of recent history clearly shows a dedicated effort to lead the world into unknowingly accepting communitarian solutions. To understand how philosophical Communitarianism advanced itself, the authors traced it back to the original source. Using the works of the leading Communitarian theorists, they followed the path from Seattle Neighborhood Plans all the way to the International Court at the Hague.
Conclusion: The foundation for the communitarian theory is undisputedly the Hegelian dialectic; Part I, a tutorial on the Hegelian dialectic is fully substantiated by Jesuit priests, Renowned Marxists and Pope John Paul. Theoretical analysis, i.e.. (A) Communitarianism did not evolve naturally (B) and it was never a movement that arose out of U.S. society (C) therefore, communitarianism has no natural home in the United States., is further substantiated with 70 verifiable, solid references that overwhelmingly support it. Part II, also heavily referenced, outlines historical events leading to the global communitarian synthesis. The changing duality of the new legal system clearly indicates Communitarianism is a criminal enterprise whose aim is to destroy all legal institutions established under national and state constitutions. Both Part I and Part II establish the aims and shared goals of the lesser arms involved in the global communitarian insurrection, showing direct ties to the War on Terror business, the European Union's integration under Communitarian Law, the emerging North American Free Trade Zone, UN Local Agenda 21, global sustainable development programs, Regionalization, Faith-Based Initiatives, Volunteer America, Community Oriented Policing, Rebuilding Community and Community Development.
We remembered we've never wrote an abstract for our thesis, so I'm working on it as fast as I can so it can be in the hardcopy which goes to the printer this week. We haven't had an academic advisor "assisting" us since Professor Crawley at UWyoming helped us write the explanation for the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning in 2004. Our anti-thesis didn't start out in the usual fashion, and we have never been affiliated with an accredited anti-communitarian program of study, because it does not exist anywhere in the world. You can study Wiccan priesthood all over the U.S., but American colleges do not teach the antithesis to communitarian theory. Like the Hegel page used to say before Nordica edited it off, since the communitarian synthesis is so perfect it gives rise to no antithesis, our theory cannot exist.
I didn't make it past my third year in college; I just looked up a format for writing an abstract tonight. Thank God for the internet or I'd be trudging down to the local library and ordering books through the snail mail to find something I can access and reference at home, almost for free, in seconds. Still amazes me to think about the way I did research in the 80s and how I was so excited my roommate had an electric typewriter! Anyway, it needs to be modified and fine tuned; be interesting to see what Nordica does with it tomorrow. Any suggestions?
0 comments:
Post a Comment