Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Civil society, human rights and Jewish-Israeli communitarians by LIORA SION

Zionist founder of the Communitarian Network, Amitai Etzioni, preaches communitarianism as a universal ideology. The Pope preaches it as a universal spirituality. Yet in practice and principle... it's pure racism.
Civil society, human rights and Jewish-Israeli communitarians
LIORA SION 20 September 2013
In many parts of the world, ordinary people view universal human rights as a “good thing,” something to support and enforce. Many Jewish Israelis will likely say the same, but only for people living elsewhere; Tibet, perhaps, or even Syria. When it comes to the Palestinians, I doubt many Israelis would feel the same way.
I’ve interviewed many United Nations representatives about their work on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, and most say Jewish Israelis are not aware of, and do not want to be aware of, the conditions facing Palestinians living just a few miles down the road. For all intents and purposes, as far as most Jewish Israelis are concerned, Palestinians reside on the moon.
As an Israeli citizen, academic, and human rights activist, I have to agree with those assessments.
In openGlobalRights, Jesse Montell, director of the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem, argues that the Israeli human rights community can and should expand its support base within Israel. I agree, but am not particularly hopeful. Jewish-Israeli civil society is not strong, and there is a growing gap between the Israeli human rights community, on the one hand, and the majority of Israeli Jews, on the other.
Ashutosh Varshney, a noted scholar of Indian politics, writes that civil societies are often implicated in communal and ethnic conflict. This is very true for Israel. For many years, there was little division between state and civil society in Israel. As a result, what passed for “civil society” in the country was as much a protagonist in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict as the Israeli state itself, and the state’s security forces. As scholar Uri Ben Eliezer shows, this is part and parcel of a long-standing tradition, in which the Israeli state enveloped and engulfed civil society, leaving little distinction between rulers and the ruled. Scarred by the horrors of the Holocaust, Israeli state and society were joined at the hip, welded together in an all-encompassing Zionist consensus.
It is true, as Montell says, that a new and more autonomous civil society has begun to emerge in Israel, one whose core logics are post-Zionist, cosmopolitan, and universalist. This new civil society is challenging Zionist communitarianism, calling instead for the inclusion of marginalised groups, such as African foreign workers and refugees living in south Tel Aviv.
Many Jewish Israelis do not welcome this new cosmopolitanism, however, and the Holocaust’s bitter legacy gives the communitarians more influence than the Jewish universalists. As a result, many Jewish Israelis view today’s post-Zionist human rights groups as national traitors, rather than as universalist heroes.
Consider, for example, the campaign against the New Israel Fund (NIF), a Jewish foundation that supports many of Israel’s most cosmopolitan civil society organizations, including Jewish groups fighting against religious coercion, and those supporting women’s liberation and empowerment of the poor.
As a result of this campaign, you have only to mention that “funding was provided by the NIF” for most Jewish Israelis to reject the project or organization outright. This is in part because the NIF also supports groups such as theMossawa Center or Adalah, both of which promote the rights of Israel’s Palestinian Arab citizens. Those groups, along with the NIF, are viewed as enemies, traitors, and anti-Semites.
Ian Lustick argues in openGlobalRights that Israel, like South Africa, is heading toward pariah status. I agree. I do not believe, however, that the international boycott campaign will help convince many Jewish Israelis that Israeli policies, rather than anti-Semitism, lies at the root of their isolation. Instead, a boycott is more likely to convince them even further that the world is against Israel for no good reason, thanks in part to the traitorous behavior of Jewish Israeli human rights organizations serving as Western or anti-Semitic spies.
The international boycott campaign, in other words, plays straight into the hands of the Jewish-Israeli right wing. You cannot threaten a sieged mentality society with a boycott.


Brian said...

Do you know the meaning of the word racism?

Also, how come you never discuss the influence of free masonry in the new world order and how American protestants advocate tacitly and explicitly this satanic belief system?

Lark In Texas said...

Brian, are you aware that 'racism' was first coined [as an English language word] by the virulent Jewish racist... and mass murderer... Leon Trotsky? That 'genocide' was first coined by the Polish Jewish lawyer, linguist and polyglot, Rafael Lemkin?

Why would you think it racist to even bring 'certain issues' into the light of day? Are you also an advocate for the teachings of the Talmud and Marxian 'political correctness'?

Surely you don't think me unfeeling or impertinent merely by posing these questions, do ya?

I've been reading Niki's blog religiously since 2004; and I can tell you emphatically that she doesn't have a racist bone in her body.

Try doing a site search sometime for keywords and/or tags such as 'Kaballah' and 'the communitarian trap' for starters. There is much which can be learned here, my friend.

Anonymous said...


Here is an interesting expose of racism. Racism directed toward all goy.

sovereigntea said...

Bit of a long read but this may give you some insight.

PS in the UK we are now infiltrated by 5000 Saul Alinsky Community Organisers they have a budget of £20000 a year each. The ruling Conservative (Likud) party have just deleted all of their files and videos including those that mention Saul Alinsky, I wonder why ?

see here for the document they tried to hide http://www.ukcolumn.org/sites/default/files/Conservative%20home%20blog.pdf

See here for the article