Showing posts with label nau. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nau. Show all posts

Friday, February 5, 2010

"Could - and should - English win the "language war" in regional integration? NAFTA and EU experience"

Must have been about a year ago when John from Stop Common Purpose UK asked me what I know about the influence of a man named Antonio Gramsci on Communitarian thinking. I was unfamiliar with Gramsci, and planned to look him up sometime later. The next time I saw his name was in Malachai Martin's Keys of This Blood, again I thought I better spend some time looking into this guy's ideas. Now here he is again, this time in a Jean Monnet Working Paper.

Hopefully by now most readers here know that all global-to-local political changes begin with regional trade integration. The EU began as a Soviet idea for a European trade agreement and expanded into a regional government with its own currency and constitution. The EU is held up as the "model" for all other emerging regional unions. And maybe by now most US readers also know that the very idea of regional integration violates our entire constitutional justice system and that if the FBI was doing their job these regional integration activists would be investigated and based upon the abundance of evidence, charged with sedition and treason.

The war is against our sovereignty and existence as an independent nation. Every new regulation and requirement works toward this purpose.

The North American Model Legislature, Querétaro (México), May 30th to June 4th, 2010
http://www.fina-nafi.org/eng/fina/presentation.asp?count=eng

Dear friends of the Jean Monnet Center,

We are pleased to announce the online publication of the thirteenth paper in the 2009 Jean Monnet Working Paper series. We include the abstract of this paper below:

Stephan Sberro, "Could - and should - English win the "language war" in regional integration? NAFTA and EU experience"
(JMWP no. 13/09)

Whereas the linguistic governance of the European Union and its institutions is the object of a heated political debate, there is no such problem yet in North America. This disregard for a "linguistic balance of power" is likely to be temporary. In the case of a deepening in North American Integration such a political debate is bound to emerge. In such case the experience of the ongoing debate in Europe could be invaluable.

It is a highly political as well as a highly technical debate which has not much to do with purely linguistic considerations and more with political ones. Although it is often considered as inevitable, choosing English as the only regional communication language in Europe or North America is neither neutral nor costless.

To frame these discussions, the notion of "soft power" was developed both in the United States and in Europe, although with different approaches. As theorized by Joseph Nye, "soft power" describes the ability of a State to influence directly or indirectly the behaviour or the interests of other actors through cultural or ideological means.

These ideas are an adaptation in International Relations of A. Gramsci's notion of hegemony where dominant ideas are particularly powerful because they are assumed as implicit aspects of a more explicit ideology. It is also related to P. Bourdieu's ideas about the symbolic value and thus domination of one particular language over others, based on misrecognition (méconnaissance).

To us, language is the most concrete, measurable and should we say scientific way to observe the diffusion of soft power. In this regard, the main focus will be made in three languages that can still be an instrument of power in international relations: English, Spanish and French.

Is a regional linguistic regime desirable and possible in North America? Is the European linguistic policy successful and is it a useful reference? These are the questions we shall consider in this article.

We invite you to access this Working Paper on the Jean Monnet Center website at www.jeanmonnetprogram.org. (all external links and red font added by me, N.R.)
Guess it's time to get started:
http://www.internationalgramscisociety.org/

North American Integration
? As in NAU? So it wasn't just a silly conspiracy theory after all?

"The North American Integration and Development Center was created to conduct ongoing research concerning North American integration and to assist communities and governments with policies and investment projects for sustainable and equitable development across borders."
http://naid.sppsr.ucla.edu/

"The governments of Canada, the United States, and Mexico face thorny challenges as they decide whether and how to accelerate smooth, and institutionalize the integration process. Pastor, Rozenthal, and Beatty encourage greater dialogue among the three governments and their citizens, as well as more systematic thinking among policymakers and citizens about the promise and challenges of further North American integration." The Future of North American Integration Beyond NAFTA, Trade, Global Economics, Peter Hakim and Robert E. Litan, eds., Brookings Institution Press 2002 c. 129pp.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Canada's "deep" integration with the EU a model for the US

arctic entry becoming useful already

Canada's story should be an eye opener for anyone who doubts the U.S. will ever merge with Canada and Mexico into a regional union, or become subserviant to a central global government bureaucracy. The most telling part is how the public wasn't provided with copies of the drafts for the agreement (and how that fact is ommitted from the Globe and Mail article about the talks). We've been getting lots of visitors from Eastern Europe searching for "communitarian law." That's because deep EU integration requires modifying national law under the supremacy of communtarian law, and unlike America and Canada, some people in those nations know it's a very real legal process. I'll bet in Slovakia people don't call it a "conspiracy theory." I can't help thinking about the Irish and how they're doing since they rejected the Lisbon Treaty via a national vote. To give up a nation's sovereignty and independence should require full disclosure and a national vote, shouldn't it? And if it fails, it shoudn't be allowed to continue, should it?

"The pitch he is making to Europeans is to do a deal with Canada that can serve as a model for something far more ambitious with the United States." Provinces key to EU trade deal, Quebec Premier says, by KAREN HOWLETT, October 3, 2008
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20081003.CHAREST03/TPStory/Nationa

l

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Knowledge Driven Revolution

Anyone recognize this view?

Here's a very well laid out site with some very pertinent information about the UN and UNESCO. Thanks Pete! http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.com/

Thursday, February 28, 2008

The "C" word that nobody uses...

Here's a perfect example of why so few Americans know what communitarianism is. The dialectic between capitalism and communism is still a great way to keep Americans behind the times. The International communists merged in a perfect Hegelian synthesis with the Christian-Judaic capitalists over 20 years ago.

The patriotic "Christian right" loves to lead us back to focusing on the 1950s Cold War and the communist/socialist left so that 1) Opponents can be easily labeled and discounted as "red baiters" and "McCarthyists" and 2) Opponents will never address the 21st century laws and programs by their real names (which ensures they will never have the ability to stop it or challenge it in an American court of law).

Communitarianism is the perfect blend of all ideas and theories. It's the final stage of human social evolution as prescribed by the theorists who brought us every modern conflict, including capitalism versus communism. The left finds an easy target in the Christian Right (who often openly support the Zionist Radical Middle).

Charlotte Iserbyt knows what communitarianism is, but you'd never know that from her most recent article on regionalization and the NAU. Charlotte thinks we should all start calling commmunitarianism "communism."

The plans and structure for globalization is not called "communist law" in the academic or international legal community. It's called "communitarian law." Regionalization is emerging legislated under trade agreements that include the "Supremacy of Communitarian Law" clause. The EU Court is called the Communitarian Court of Justice. Hundreds of European and Latin American colleges offer Ph.D.s in Communitarian Law.

Barack Obamba and Hillary Clinton are openly identified in the American press as communitarian, not communist. But yeah okay, let's all start asking them about their "communist" beliefs so they can discount us as McCarthyists and minimalize any damage they might suffer by being asked REAL Qs.

I've had a lot of respect for Iserbyt since I beagn my research, and I've often tooted her horn in my articles, but come on Charlotte, who's deliberately dumbing down who?
From: norgesen, Sent: Feb 27, 2008 9:54 AM
To: Global_Police_State@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Conspiracy> The North American 'Soviet' Union

Regionalism is communism no matter how you slice it. The sooner Americans get that unpleasant fact permanently entered into their brains, and process that information into appropriate action, the sooner we will be able to escape what Orwell described so well in his novel 1984


THE NORTH AMERICAN 'SOVIET' UNION

By Charlotte Iserbyt

February 27, 2007

There is one common thread running through all articles and speeches by elected officials, well-known writers, and commentators in opposition to the merging of the United States into a political and economic regional arrangement known as the North American Union. To my knowledge, not one of them has chosen to use the “C” word (communism) when warning Americans of the dangers of this unconstitutional merger about to be foisted upon us without proper hearings in Congress. Excellent speeches and articles are being given and written warning us of all sorts of bad things related to this merger, including the fact that we will lose our sovereignty, but we are not being told that all these bad things are necessary for the full implementation of The North American Soviet Union (communistic/regional system). Isn’t the “C” word the one and only word which might shock Americans out of their state of conditioned apathy, thereby bringing about citizen activism which might result in killing this “regional” monster?

Morris Zeitlin, a communist writer for the Communist Party’s Daily World said in an article entitled “Planning is Socialism’s Trademark,” November 8, 1975: “We (USA) have no regional government and no comprehensive regional planning to speak of. Regional government and planning remain concepts our urban scholars and planners have long advocated in vain…In socialist countries, metropolitan regions enjoy metropolitan regional government and comprehensive planning. The economic and functional efficiencies and the social benefits that comprehensive national, regional and city planning make possible in socialist society explain the Soviet Union’s enormous and rapid economic social progress…”

Of interest regarding Zeitlin’s comment about “the Soviet Union’s enormous and rapid economic social progress…” is the following admission made by former President Gorbachev at the 2005 National School Board Association conference that “half the world’s population and two-thirds of Russia’s lives in poverty.”

The United States Government, at all levels, has since 1975 accepted wholeheartedly Zeitlin’s advice, to the extent that our country is, believe it or not, almost 100 percent socialist in its political, economic, social and environmental (sustainable development) policies. For documentation please read “Walks Like a Duck, Talks Like a Duck.”

The regionalization (consolidation) of the world is quite similar to the three-stage plan outlined by Stalin at the 1936 Communist International. At that meeting, the official program proclaimed:

“Dictatorship can be established only by a victory of socialism in different countries or groups of countries, after which there would be federal unions of the various groupings of these socialist countries, and the third stage would be an amalgamation of these regional federal unions into a world union of socialist nations.” (Ed note: The third stage is taking place right now as we in the United States of America become part of a federal union, the North American Union, which will in the near future become part of a world union of socialist nations.)

Former President of the Soviet Union Gorbachev on March 23, 2000, in London, referred to the European Union (EU) as "the New European Soviet.” If he refers to the EU in that way, it only stands to reason that he would refer to the North American Union (NAU) as the “New American Soviet,” since the NAU is modeled on the EU. Gorbachev also said in his speech to the Soviet Central Committee on November 2, 1987, published by Novosti Press Agency Publishing House:

“We are moving toward a new world, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.”

How is it possible that if American citizens or United States officials involved in putting us under the North American Union were aware of Gorbachev’s statements, they would not be very concerned regarding our nation becoming part of a communist world? Have we forgotten the many hundreds of millions of innocent people tortured, starved, murdered and incarcerated by communist regimes around the world? Authorities say “over 20 million people suffered in purges under Vladimir Lenin and Josef Stalin -- and that more than 10 million died before Stalin's death in 1953. Some put the number even higher.” [Read]

Do we really believe the communists have changed or gone away?

United States government officials, elected and unelected, with enormous financial assistance from the tax-exempt foundations, have for many years been working to implement unconstitutional regional planning at the local, state, national and international level, all of this required for full implementation of a One World Socialist Government. For the 3000-page transcript of 1953 Congressional (Reece and Cox Committee) Hearings to Investigate the Tax-Exempt Foundations and for superb research on the history of regional government, go to americandeception.com and type the following into its search engine: Reece Committee, Don Bell Reports, Maureen Heaton, the Mantooth Report, and The Emerging North American Union.

One very important government official in the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations, Under Secretary of State George W. Ball, spelled out very clearly what the Insiders were planning for our nation in The New York Times, 1/24/88: “…If we could internationalize by using the United Nations in conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to fear in most cases a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the shape of the world and might get the UN back doing something useful. …Sooner or later we’re going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they’re not confined merely to the nation states. Start first on a regional, and ultimately you can move to a world, basis.” (emphasis added).

Has our education system so successfully conditioned and dumbed down Americans that they no longer are able to apply logic to the above quotes? Are they no longer capable of transferring that knowledge, processing it into new knowledge and conclusions which might help them understand and oppose the present destruction of our Constitutional Republic?

Since all regional groupings being set up around the world are based on the communistic Free Trade “redistribute the wealth” philosophy, why is it that the adjective “Communist” is never used when discussing GATT, NAFTA, CAFTA and the NAU? Those patriotic writers could at least describe those agreements as “Communism LITE,” couldn’t they?

For those Americans who recall the days of elected officials, not unelected, appointed task forces and “councils” (soviets, according to most dictionaries), running our towns, schools, counties, states, nation and world, recognizing this change in our form of government should not be too difficult.

However, for those younger Americans denied an education in American history and government due to the activities of the tax-exempt foundations, especially the Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie Foundations, the loss of elected officials through regionalism does not seem to bother them. Go to americandeception.com and type into search engine “Kenny Hignite” and you will see a most astonishing six-page 1954 “Test on the United States Constitution” on which Hignite received a grade of 99 – “Excellent!” There is absolutely no way that Kenny Hignite, now 66 years old, having received such an excellent education on the U.S. Constitution in a public school in Central California in 1954, would not be questioning the present deliberate destruction of our representative form of government through the implementation of communistic regional government!

Those Americans under fifty years old, and too often those over 50 years old (!), will ask you “What’s wrong with members of the community or faceless state bureaucrats being appointed to assist our elected officials in their work which has become increasingly complicated?” The simple answer is “If you don’t approve of what those unelected officials are doing, you can’t get rid of them at the polls.”

Uneducated Americans will also ask you:

“What’s wrong with consolidation of school districts, services, the merging of individual school and town budgets to “save taxpayers money?” (Ed note: In Maine our Senate Education Committee is about to approve Governor Baldacci’s proposal to slash school districts by proposing 26 regional school units statewide with 26 superintendents, compared to the existing 152 superintendents and 290 school units!);

“What’s wrong with merging 16 towns under one county council as was recently proposed in Cumberland County, Maine, thereby eliminating representative government?”;

“What’s wrong with getting rid of local school boards and having our schools run by city Mayors, or contracting education out to private organizations connected with the corporations?”;

“What possible objection could you have to public school morals and values education even if those programs are forbidden to teach ‘absolute’ morals and values based on the Ten Commandments?”;

“What’s wrong with publicly-funded charter schools which have no elected school boards?”;

“What’s wrong with Cuban-style school-to-work job training replacing a K-12 liberal arts curriculum? Even if my child can’t read, I sure want him/her to be able to get a job.”;

“What’s wrong with public/private partnerships?”

“What’s wrong with the federal government mandating mental health screening for my child?”;

“What’s wrong with members of the community assisting the local police in monitoring citizen activities and/or the police handing out awards to citizens who do good deeds, as is the case with the Community-Oriented Policing System (COPS) in Maine?”;

“What’s wrong with putting the UN’s lifelong learning agenda, all community services (birth through death), under the umbrella of the school district? (Go to americandeception.com and type “Feld” into search engine for a remarkable research paper on the history of Community Education)

“What’s wrong with a National I.D. card reportedly designed by two Russian ex-KGB Chiefs?”;

“What’s wrong with students being required to perform community service in order to graduate?”;

“What’s wrong with federal funding of religious organizations (faith-based initiative)?”;

“What’s wrong with federally-funded school choice proposals?”;

“What’s wrong with dropping borders between states?” as is in the offing.

And, the subject of this article: “What’s wrong with regional government?” And many more “What’s Wrong With?” questions from good Americans who have, over many years, through no fault of their own, been deliberately dumbed down and didn’t receive the public education which required the likes of Kenny Hignite to know their Constitution and form of government.

How many Americans realize that almost all the programs mentioned in the above “What’s Wrong With” section have already been implemented in our schools, communities, and states and that they are based on communist/socialist collectivist philosophy? The planners are waiting only for the full implementation of the North American Union (final nail in coffin) which will allow them to write and approve, as was done in Europe, the North American Union’s Constitution (Communist Manifesto) which will include all the above “What’s Wrong With?” programs. That will be the infamous day when the U.S. Constitution is formally relegated to history’s trash bin. And, as with the EU Constitution, or the Communist Manifesto, the practice of Christianity will be outlawed… a thing of the past. All religions will be considered equal and inevitably superior to Christianity. Go to americandeception.com and type into search engine “Religion and Governance” an important position paper by Harlan Cleveland, notorious supporter of global government, long-time member of the internationalist Aspen Institute, and first U.S. Ambassador to the Common Market (1960), and Marc Luycx, a Belgian change agent bureaucrat. This paper was prepared by the Foreward Study Group of the European Commission and was undoubtedly used by those drafting the EU Constitution. It will give you a picture of the non-role of Christianity in world region constitutions.

Our elected officials in Congress, who have sworn to uphold the Constitution, should not be immune to multi-million dollar lawsuits for injuries sustained by the citizens of this country. Is not the loss of our freedoms due to elected officials’ malpractice (lying to us in regard to putting us under the communistic regional North American Union and not holding hearings on the subject) even more important than the death of one patient due to a doctor’s malpractice, the scalding of a woman who spilled her “too-hot” coffee at a McDonald’s takeout, or the death from cancer of a woman who smoked too many cigarettes? How can we ignore the fact that 651,008 Americans have died in battle to protect and defend the constitutional freedoms which will vanish under this new international regional arrangement? Is there really no penalty to be exacted of these highly-paid Congressional traitors other than voting them out of office, which it seems is impossible to do due to both political parties having the same agenda, controlled media, manipulated political conventions, and election fraud?

Americans have been conditioned to NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, since the days of McCarthyism and the phony fall of communism, mention the “C” word. The word must, as George Orwell might have said, be removed from the dictionaries of all languages, especially English. Otherwise, we might wise up and tackle this treason with all our might and brains since we surely don't want our children and grandchildren living under any “ism” form of government, much less “communism.” The Insiders know that “communism” is the one and only word that must be banished from use. They are not concerned over excellent anti-North American Union rantings and ravings as long as the “C” word is NOT used.

The Insiders, most if not all of whom are corporate communists, have no fear of the coming totalitarian system since they have been assured they will be sitting in the catbird seat, having eliminated all economic competition and self-government (elected officials), and will have the world as their playground. The majority of the world’s population, the Insiders’ “human resources”, will be their highly trained and conditioned serfs, lifelong.

One might ask, how can this be? It is a well-known and documented fact that Wall Street funded the Bolshevik Revolution and the corporate communists and our government have been supporting the communist regime in Russia since 1917. Extensive exchange agreements covering political, municipal, cultural, economic, legal, law enforcement, education, science, sports, medicine, etc. have been signed since 1958 between the USSR and the USA, including of special importance the 1985 education agreements signed by Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev which merged our two education systems and caused to be implemented the Soviet polytechnical work force/job quota system and the Pavlovian outcomes-based method of conditioning/training. Go to americandeception.com for full text of “Agreement between U.S.A. and USSR.”

Regionalism is communism no matter how you slice it. The sooner Americans get that unpleasant fact permanently entered into their brains, and process that information into appropriate action, the sooner we will be able to escape what Orwell described so well in his novel 1984:

"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on the human face--forever...and remember, that is forever."

Forward this article to your friends and to your elected officials at the local, state, and national level. Of equal importance restore the "C" word to your vocabulary and use it often.

© 2007 Charlotte T. Iserbyt - All Rights Reserved

Charlotte Iserbyt is the consummate whistleblower! Iserbyt served as Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education, during the first Reagan Administration, where she first blew the whistle on a major technology initiative which would control curriculum in America's classrooms. Iserbyt is a former school board director in Camden, Maine and was co-founder and research analyst of Guardians of Education for Maine (GEM) from 1978 to 2000. She has also served in the American Red Cross on Guam and Japan during the Korean War, and in the United States Foreign Service in Belgium and in the Republic of South Africa.

Iserbyt is a speaker and writer, best known for her 1985 booklet Back to Basics Reform or OBE: Skinnerian International Curriculum and her 1989 pamphlet Soviets in the Classroom: America's Latest Education Fad which covered the details of the U.S.-Soviet and Carnegie-Soviet Education Agreements which remain in effect to this day. She is a freelance writer and has had articles published in Human Events, The Washington Times, The Bangor Daily News, and included in the record of Congressional hearings.

Website: www.deliberatedumbingdown.com

E-Mail: dumbdown00@yahoo.com

http://www.newswithviews.com/iserbyt/iserbyt36.htm

==

  • Former USSR Premier/ex KGB Head To Work for Homeland Security! 4-23-03

  • Community/ Communist Oriented Policing 2-13-03

  • New Spectator Sport for Americans...Watch it Play Out! 2-1-03

  • Kissinger out of the Closet

  • Cold War Myth: An Exercise in the Use of the Dialectic

  • Death Sentence for Private and Home Education, Courtesy of Supreme Court

  • No American Left Alone!



  • Regionalism is communitarianism no matter how you slice it. But why learn the real terms of the present or the future when you can comfortably languish in the past?

    Tuesday, February 19, 2008

    Complex Communitarian Cops on Camels

    Security, Human Rights and Humanitarian Actions

    Week 2, 23 - 27 June 2008

    programme-IA-security-human-rights-detail.jpg

    Overview

    This module focuses on the interactions between states and individuals within an increasingly legalized international context. It explores recent efforts to provide international humanitarian assistance (in cases of natural disasters or in cases of civil wars). The programme also focuses on international efforts to control the spread of weapons as well as on mechanisms for conflict resolution between states.

    The importance of international organizations will be examined, such as International Red Cross, UN High Commissioner for Refugees, the UN Council of Human Rights, as well as the UN Security Council and UN General Assembly or the International Court of Justice.

    The programme will also evaluate the role of NGOs and private initiatives in the protection of individual rights and the promotion of human security.

    Morning lectures will focus on:

    • Complexity of Human Security
    • Practical issues on negotiating disarmament
    • Humanitarian Law and the role of non-state actors
    • Roles of international organisations and non-governmental organisations in peace building

    Afternoon workshops and visits:

    • Meeting with Delegates of International Organisations based in Geneva
    • Visit to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
    • Small group interactive seminars with experts
    • Participation to the United Nations Conference on Disarmament
    • Evening debate with a guest speaker on current issues

    Social events:

    • Welcome dinner
    • Week-end trip suggestions

    Detailed syllabus will be provided to admitted participants before the programme."

    http://graduateinstitute.ch/executive/summer/international-affairs/programme-IA/security-human-rights_en.html

    Saturday, February 16, 2008

    Mexicans Better Equipped to Become NAU Peacekeepers

    This isn't the article I started out writing tonight, and Nordica thinks the sarcasm will be lost on some people. She says that I should try to be a "better teacher." But I'm not a teacher. I'm not even really a writer. I'm trained as a government policy investigator. I got involved in this work while I was working on property rights lawsuits in Seattle. I tried to get my research and information into the hands of legitimate lawmakers and journalists beginning in1999. I finally started a website and uploaded our thesis and topic pages beginning in 2003. Then over the past several years I've contacted hundreds of American whistleblowers with our research.

    It's been a rude awakening to recognise that certain members of the alternative "news" community consider communitarianism my own little term I like to use. I'm starting to understand the techniques in use against me, and I'm pretty much done ignoring accusations from Americans who label me as a tin-foil-hat. I'm also now accused of being an egomaniac for insisting on the inclusion of communitarianism in discussions and "exposes" about NAU communitarian regionalization. I'n not like that at all, and while I was always defiant when city officials told me I couldn't review their notes, I've made every effort to approach my fellow Americans with humbleness in my heart. But maybe I should go ahead and start acting like I'm the big whatever. Our thesis is downloaded every day by visitors from universities around the world. Either somebody disputes it, or we are the leading experts (in the nobody important category) on NAU regional integration and NAU communitarian justice in the United States.

    Mexicans Better Equipped to Become NAU Peacekeepers
    by Niki Raapana
    February 16, 2008

    It sure is a good thing the North American Union is just a silly conspiracy theory. Thank goodness President Bush put our minds to rest on that whole fallacy. If there really was a new system of regional government in the USA, then Americans would be like the Romanians, decades behind in a few significant areas:

    "Over a decade since European Convention ratification, Romanian Law School graduates do not have elementary knowledge about the law system offered by CEDO and CEJ, and, only a few months before the adhesion, the communitarian law curricula is rarely present within law faculties programs of study, although the lack of adequate education of our legal experts in the field of European protection of human rights determined already great loss to the Romanian Government, at least 50 millions EURO. Because of these major deficiencies, the lack of personnel in the Justice Department can not be covered, despite the great number of Law graduates." (1)


    We have millions of people in this country who devote their lives to researching, teaching, studying (and protecting) the original American political and economic system. Many of our citizens appear to be very well educated in the historical and legal foundations for our republic. Our people still study U.S. Constitutional Law because that's the law of our land. If the old system had been replaced with a new system, then Americans would have to be told about it, wouldn't they?

    If it were true that the U.S. is integrating with Mexico and Canada under the supremacy of global communitarian law, we'd have attorneys like Marcos Mercado Delgadillo:

    "MARCOS MERCADO DELGADILLO, Post-graduate degree in Education, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, La Paz – Bolivia; Masters in Industrial and Intellectual Property and Information Society Law, Alicante – Spain; Masters in Economic Law, Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar, La Paz – Bolivia; Law Degree, Universidad Católica Boliviana, La Paz – Bolivia. PRIOR EXPERIENCE: National Intellectual Property Office, Head of Trademarks and Distinctive Signs Department, La Paz; Pons - Patents and Trademarks, Madrid - Spain; Mostajo Sociedad Civil, Associate Lawyer, La Paz; Ministry of Justice, Legal Advisor in the Drafting Commission for intellectual Property Law Project, La Paz.OTHER ACTIVITIES: Professor of Intellectual Property Law. PRACTICE AREAS: Intellectual Property, E-commerce, Integration and Andean Communitarian Law, Corporate Law. (2)

    If it were true that the USA is reorganizing itself under a global communitarian system of justice, we'd hear about it from our free press. We have thousands of news businesses whose job it is to bring us the news that matters. Something so huge (and so illegal) would never have slid past all those smart CNN reporters. If Amitai Etzioni and the Communitarian Network really held a summit in 2004, the U.S. freepress would have covered this historical event. Americans would have been introduced to their groundbreaking moral themes.

    If Wolf V. Heydebrand from New York University really led a session at the 2004 Communitarian Summit on “Economic Globalization and the Logic of Process in American and European Law” this would have been reported by somebody, someplace in the United States.

    If Heino Heinrich Nau from the University of Frankurt am Main presented a paper called “European Predecessors of Communitarian Economics” and Norton Garfinkle from The George Washington University Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies presented information about “Communitarian Economics: Maintaining Economic Growth and the Values of Civic Society,” the American voting populace would have been told a little something about their emerging economic system, wouldn't they?

    America enjoys freedom of the press. If Amitai Etzioni really said on his blog on January 17, 2008, "If the current lineup holds, the Democrats will be represented in the forthcoming national elections by a communitarian" and then boasted that ".. communitarians should not uncork the champagne quite yet, but they can safely put a bottle or two into the fridge," that kind of news would have not only been in a David Brooks New York Times editorial, it would have made headlines in every newspaper in the country.

    Rep. Nancy Pelosi never introduced a bill adopting UN Local Agenda 21 in the United States that was passed by the House the 102d CONGRESS, 2d Session, called H. CON. RES. 353, a

    "CONCURRENT RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should assume a strong leadership role in implementing the decisions made at the Earth Summit by developing a national strategy to implement Agenda 21 and other Earth Summit agreements through domestic policy and foreign policy, by cooperating with all countries to identify and initiate further agreements to protect the global environment, and by supporting and participating in a high-level United Nations Sustainable Development Commission. (3)

    No authority ever printed the words: "Over 160 countries are now Parties to the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (the Convention) which was ratified by the United States in 1992. " ( Survey of International Agreements.) Only an idiot would believe "Congress also closely followed the progress of U.N. negotiations for achieving a framework convention on global climate and sent a parliamentary delegation to the Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro, in June. The Senate consented to ratification of the Convention [Treaty Doc. 102-381; the instrument of ratification was signed by the President on Oct. 13, 1992." (4)

    The 109th CONGRESS, 2d Session did not see the introduction of H. RES. 873, designed for

    "Recognizing the continued importance of the transatlantic partnership between the United States and the European Union by expressing support for the success of the forthcoming US-EU Summit in Vienna, Austria, on June 21, 2006."
    We don't need to learn anything about communitarianism, do we? No, we don't. Don't listen to me. I haven't spent any time researching this subject. It's my made up word. I only made communitarianism seem important when it's actually so minor it doesn't even need to be mentioned by name. The editors at Wikpedia are right. Communitarian Law doesn't exist anywhere except in my imagination. If anything, it's only communism, and duh, we already know what that is. As a leading American speaker against the NAU recently explained in an email:

    "I simply have not had the time to introduce communitarianism or community law which, to my way of thinking, is a concept that underlies the NAU but is MANIFEST in many ways which I DO cover extensively in my writings without specifically naming it... As for using Niki's communitarianism term explicitly . . . I informed Niki quite a while ago that I would write about it in my planned Communism article. A massive piece of research I have tried valiantly to write for nearly a year and a half." (5)
    We have additional proof of the non-importance of studying communitarianism. There are millions of American bloggers and thousands of American websites who never mention it at all, ever. These are dedicated people who dilligently work to expose aspects of our history and current events that are ignored in the mainstream news. With so many people claiming to be seeking and exposing the "truth," communitarian regional governance would all have been exposed long before now.

    No researcher or political party ever said the American people were too stupid to understand it. No patriotic Americans have claimed they don't include the UN/EU/NAU legal term when they're writing about the new laws for the American masses. Besides, even if it was true and they did want to tell Americans all about it, they know they can't. Everyone knows Americans are incapable of learning anything beyond common, ordinary issues. The real world is too upsetting for them, it sends Americans running in terror. Why would upper educated anti-NAU researchers waste their reputations on such obvious tin-foil hat material?

    "Even though I am a Ph.D., and could write for the scholarly, I don't! Why? Because I know the masses are just plain everyday folks who haven't a CLUE what is happening all around them. So I use common ordinary language, everyday ordinary issues, real-world material about what is happening out there. That way they can see and relate to it, and understand what I am referring to when covering the SPP-NAU. I do that PURPOSEFULLY so that people will not run screaming into the night in total terror, or call me a tin-foil hat, who is a purveyor of conspiracy theories." (5)
    Many American websites and blogs are well researched and include detailed scientific theories about what really happened on 9/11, HAARP technology, ChemTrails, AIDS and cancer. Other highly educated Americans delve deep into difficult studies of empires, wars, philosophy, religions, freemasonry, Sumeria, Atlantis and aliens. Our terrified, stupid people somehow manage to study and publish complex, jargon filled articles on sports, technology, economics and financial matters. But they could never understand communitarianism, so why bother?

    Don't worry America. The European Union and other Communitarians never published volumes of papers regarding global and regional communitarian integration requirements.

    "International law is about the creation of rules of the road for interaction between nations in order to promote peace and common interests." (6)
    Amitai Etzioni is impossible to locate, either online, in person or at the local library. Etzioni's books can never be found on most American government officials' (and their NGO partner's) bookshelves. Amitai Etzioni is a conspiracy theory. Etzioni's Communitarian Network does not exist. The Communtarian Platform was never signed by hundreds of academics and politicians across America. UN and EU Communitarian Law is not the blueprint for all supra-national regional communities, especially not in the NAU (which doesn't exist anyway).

    "Amitai Etzioni has provided a vision for developing a future global civil society. If his communitarian approach has any hope, its starting place will be modern Europe. The continent's bloody rivalries of the past are history. By creating a larger community, Europe has achieved what Etzioni seeks on a global scale. How has Europe done it? Can Europe's success be a model for other parts of the world, just as its development of the modern nation-state became the model for political life in previous centuries? And will Europe itself be likely to survive as a thriving community, or will it fail in the end to sustain its own model? This article explores the basis for Europe's remarkable developments of the past 60 years and the possibilities that Europe can lead the way forward for the achievement of Etzioni's vision." (7)
    The American founders never had their own vision. The colonists never rebelled against the British Imperial Free Trade policies. The original American system never worked. Alexander Hamilton was a tool for the global elite. The national bank, coining our own money and high tariffs were bad ideas. Friedrich List didn't help the German unions kick the British out, he was ridiculed for his theory and killed himself he was so embarrassed. So, please, don't pay any attention to an article called The Lies Behind 'Free Trade', Chalmers Johnson's review of Ha-Joon Chang's "Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism" (Bloomsbury Press, 2007).

    "The title of his 2002 book comes from the German political economist Friedrich List, who in 1841 criticized Britain for preaching free trade to other countries while having achieved its own economic supremacy through high tariffs and extensive subsidies. He accused the British of "kicking away the ladder" that they had climbed to reach the world's top economic position.

    "Turning to the United States, Chang focuses on Alexander Hamilton, the first American secretary of the treasury and the man who coined the term "infant industry". Although he did not live to see it, by 1820 Hamilton's forty percent tariff on manufactured imports into the United States was an established fact. Hamilton provided the blueprint for US economic policy until the end of the Second World War. The 19th and early 20th century US tariffs of forty to fifty percent were then the highest of any country in the world. Throughout this same period, it was also the world's fastest growing economy." (8)
    We can rest assured. Just in case the NAU and communitarian regional justice is real, at least one partner in the Strategic Partnership is training their citizens to enforce NAU law.

    "On November 16, 17 and 18 the Communitarian Police celebrated their 12th anniversary in Zitlaltepec, municipality of Metlatónoc (the mountain area in Guerrero). The System of Communitarian Security and Justice extends across an area which includes 53 communities in the Coastal and Mountain area and operates from three headquarters.

    ".. since its foundation the System of Communitarian Security and Justice has been persecuted, undermined and criminalized by the Guerrero government. Almost 20 arrest warrants have been issued against the leaders of the Regional Coordinator of Communitarian Authorities (CRAC) and against the founders of the Communitarian Police, and investigations have been launched against several communitarian policemen." At the 12th anniversary of the Communitarian Police, they demand unconditional respect for the Communitarian Justice system (en 12 aniversario de la Policía Comunitaria, piden respecto irrestricto a sistema de Justicia Comunitaria)" (9)

    References

    1. The Romanian Legal System
    http://www.sojust.ro/sistemul-juridic-din-romania-raport-independent-septembrie-2006/abstract.html

    2. http://www.hierosgamos.org/hg/db_lawfirms.asp?action=attorney&n1=70536

    3. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c102:H.CON.RES.353:

    4. http://digital.library.unt.edu/govdocs/crs/permalink/meta-crs-7823:1.

    5. name withheld

    6. The Creation of a Communitarian System of International Law, http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/evidence99/pinochet/IntlLawFull.htm

    7. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 48, No. 12, 1545-1557 (2005) DOI: 10.1177/0002764205278072, © 2005 SAGE Publications, A Communitarian Future, What Can the EU Experience Teach Us? James M. Goldgeier

    8. The Lies Behind 'Free Trade' by Chalmers Johnson, a review of "Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism" (Bloomsbury Press, 2007) http://www.rense.com/general80/trade.htm

    9. CDHM Tlachinollan, 19/11/2007) http://sipazen.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/guerrero-12th-anniversary-of-the-communitarian-police/

    Thursday, December 27, 2007

    The inevitable North American Union (NAU)

    What is the SPP?

    "The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) was launched in March of 2005 as a trilateral effort to increase security and enhance prosperity among the United States, Canada and Mexico through greater cooperation and information sharing.

    This trilateral initiative is premised on our security and our economic prosperity being mutually reinforcing. The SPP recognizes that our three great nations are bound by a shared belief in freedom, economic opportunity, and strong democratic institutions.

    The SPP provides the framework to ensure that North America is the safest and best place to live and do business. It includes ambitious security and prosperity programs to keep our borders closed to terrorism yet open to trade.

    The SPP builds upon, but is separate from, our long-standing trade and economic relationships. It energizes other aspects of our cooperative relations, such as the protection of our environment, our food supply, and our public health."

    Now, what does Smarth Growth and Community Development have to do with the SPP? Well, land use and transportation are "integrated": http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/landuse/index.htm

    "The FHWA believes that "smart growth" is a concept best supported by a set of policies and programs intended to protect and preserve valuable natural and cultural resources. "Smart growth" also encourages economic development in targeted locations. While transportation is not specifically mentioned in that working definition, it is important to note that transportation affects land use just like affordable housing, good schools, and low crime rates." http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/sgindex.htm

    The Federal Highway Administration is DIRECTLY connected to EVERY communitarian program underway in the United States: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/epasg.htm

    It really doesn't matter if you're for or against this whole new trade agreement. This plan for world government is too complete. It allows for ZERO dissenting votes or opinions. Ask the French and Dutch voters what happens when their two nations included in the European Union voted against the establishment of a new "European Union" constitution. Their EU leaders simply signed a new treaty at Lisbon that adopted the "failed" EU constititution anyway.

    This could revolutionize the travel industry!

    Will Alaskans get to ride with Mexican truck drivers all the way to Mexico during the harsh winter months? Does the SPP mean Americans with DUIs and minor criminal records won't have to pay the Canadian border's mafia extortion agents just to drive back and forth between the continental U.S. and the state of Alaska? The Mexicans get travel clearance... don't they?

    Notice how the above map shows the trade route goes all the way to Fairbanks, Alaska? Well it's been amazing to watch how huge Fairbanks has grown over the past decade. The new Mitchell and Johansen Expressways were built in a large circle around the town, and massive building has been ongoing... huge new Wal Marts and Borders Bookstores in a dying town that has little to no industrial or agricultural base. It looked to me like "somebody" knew something BIG was going to happen that would create a populace to sustain all the new corporate stores. Rural Planning is a very important piece: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/rural/index.html

    So don't worry about a thing Amerika. In the USA and Canada, we're still arguing over the reality of our emerging North American Union. We don't expect any national referendums to arise from the populace in our "free" nations. Not that it would make a bit of difference even if the SPP/NAU did end up as a legally proposed constitutional amendment. Our state legislatures would probably vote for ALL of it, regardless of what their constituents want. Nothing will be allowed to sway the path of the emerging synthesis. It's our evolutionary destiny, okay?

    Don't waste your precious time away from the TV or sports by even thinking about the NAU. If you must do something "political," Christian conservatives can follow their Israeli leaders at the Horowitz Freedom Center and put all their energy into fighting the illusive Islamofascists. The left can do what they've always done. As top leaders on both sides know, promoting dialectical conflicts ensures the REAL issues facing North America are left to the more educated, moral people who should be making all the important top level decisions in secret anyway, right?

    My country's tired of me
    I've joined the SPP
    of three I sing
    Land where the U.S. ends
    where all of Canada bends
    We're all Mexican tequilla blends
    Let new slavery ring!

    Wednesday, December 26, 2007

    Reforming individuals into collectivists

    "As a change agent— you learn new ways to transform large systems." Jim Rough, Dynamic Facilitation Skills Seminar

    Before the US, Canada and Mexico can be successfully merged into one big happy North American Union, all former national citizens have to change their minds about what personal liberty and freedom means. The North American Community is a part of a global communitarian government system. Under the emerging system, individual liberty is simply not sustainable.

    Now of course elected officials are denying there is any plan to integrate nations into regional trading blocks. Indeed, our very own President Bush calls what people speculate that goes on in their closed NAU meetings an amusing conspiracy:



    Why do they have to lie about the plan to individuals living in countries where individual rights are the RULE of LAW? The Community comes first in a communitarian system. Regional trade union members are required to put the "needs" of the community BEFORE the LEGAL RIGHTS of the individuals living in the community. The U.S. Bill of Rights, for example, is an identified barrier to achieving the ultimate communitarian vision.

    Now, it doesn't appear that the Mexicans have a problem with helping to incorporate the global vision, as their government has never been one that routinely swears to "protect and defend" their people's Constitution. But in the US and Canada, where the citizens aren't migrating in droves to escape poverty, unemployment and systematic corruption, the citizens see things a little bit differently than an illegal immigrant escaping north.

    So, Americans and Canadians must be taught to think and feel differently about any leftover laws that protect their individuals. Some laws remain on the books. Too many citizens expect them to stand firm against covert changes. That's where trained change agents take over.

    Change agents/facilitators teach people how to control and manipulate small groups. The goal is to find and reward weak minded, greedy individuals who will go along with the global change agenda, and to minimize the participation of strong minded individuals who refuse to change.

    Marxists.org explains the meaning of the word "agent" when it's associated with "change:"

    " In the 1960s, Louis Althusser gave a different slant to the meaning of “agency.” For Althusser, human beings were “agents” of change in just the same way that they are carriers of a disease, i.e., he negated the subjective aspect of agency, leaving change purely as a result of structure, with no place for indivudals." http://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/a/g.htm

    It's important to note that for change agents, participating weak minded individuals don't necessarily need to know community law overrules all national, state and local laws that protect individuals. The less the participants know about UN Local Agenda 21 agreements or the principles for sustainable development the less trouble they're apt to cause. All they need to know is that the types of people who cling to "outdated" national constitutions are backwards, immoral, and pose a clear threat to the health and safety of the community.

    For those unfamiliar with the term "change agent," here's a good introduction by Will Banyan:
    http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/third_section/mitrany_fabianism07.html

    Training for friendly facilitators of Marxist change is offered by universities worldwide: "Australian universities are currently being "enterprised" by a powerful logic of managed performance, executive centralisation and a new code of corporate governance (Marginson & Considine, 2000). These changes appear as part of a systematic restructure taking place in a number of advanced systems, yet the Australian version is recognised as especially vigorous (Slaughter and Leslie, 1997; Clark, 1998; Meek and Wood, 1997). " Posted by the Australian Fabians: http://www.fabian.org.au/944.asp

    The REAL battles for the heart and soul of our people are taking place right down the street. Anyone who wants to "stop" the North American Union could make a huge impact by attending local meetings designed to "facilitate change." These little meetings and councils are where the root Fabian changes are being taught to us, our children, and our government bureaucrats. 50, 000 people can take to the streets to march in "protest" against the WTO, the NAU or the SPP, and all they'll ever achieve are Marxist goals for change (chaos, conflict, violence, etc.) But if 50 individuals who know the real score show up at a local visioning or council, they can stop the local integration meeting dead in its tracks.

    How?

    Well, first of all, the local turnouts are usually very low at the planning meetings, so it's a distinct advantage if free thinking individuals outnumber the communitarians. 5 to 1 may even be sufficient. (In Seattle in 1999, only 35 people endorsed the final Roosevelt Neighborhood Plan; the rest of my 5000 neighbors didn't have the first clue anyone was writing their "vision for the future." My continued presence and requests for their planning documents caused the City to stop some of the restrictive actions against property owners.. imagine if there'd been 10 of me.)

    Secondly, just because the leading facilitators are highly trained and skilled manipulators, they suggest numerous innovative system changes that cleverly violates constitutional law. If only one person in your group can read the plan and the agenda beforehand, they can explain the highlights of the meeting's goals to the rest. If you have ONE person in your group who knows how to make a motion to change the meeting's agenda, and you have ONE person who seconds the motion, then you can all force an immediate vote to change the meeting's agenda. (I saw this happen live in Seattle at a Revised Noise Council meeting. Rick and Susan Hangartner, who learned about the plans in Portland during the transformations there, were fully prepared to alter the facilitated agenda, and did it with the support of the Seattle Musicans' Union.)

    Jim Rough of Dynamic Facilitation Skills Seminar ... since 1990: http://www.tobe.net/topics/Seminar.html

    Jim Rough gives a nice overview of the meetings I experienced firsthand in Seattle in 1999. The leaders always have a bunch of large paper at the front of the room where they nod and smile and write down all the local's "comments." SPD COPS Officer Hope Baur admitted in the above Noise meeting that Seattle police had been told NOT to enforce the existing Noise Law for five years prior. Then, gee, when the nice facilitators arrived in Seattle neighborhood meetings and asked the locals to identify their biggest "problems," guess what most people complained about.

    Once we understand these meetings are pre-planned years in advance, then we have the option of asking to see a LOT of planning documents produced by government agencies, stakeholders, participating private businesses, world-class trainers and all other affiliated global change organizations. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in the US, our citizens can request to review and copy ANY government program using FEDERAL FUNDING. Many of these Rebuilding Community programs (#2 goal in the War on Terror) come under Homeland Security now, so they'll be hard pressed to claim local status anymore. Many states also have a state public documents act... this can be used when State of City public officials try to avoid your request by claiming they do not come under the 1974 FOIA.

    So far I haven't met ONE person who lives in Anchorage, AK who's read Anchorage 2020. This is where the REAL CHANGES to the entire U.S. constitutional system are written down. Since 2005, I've asked thousands of Alaskans if they've seen or read anything about Anchorage 2020, and all I get back from them are blank stares. Here's how phony communitarians are: according to the Municipality,

    "the citizen involvement process that led to adoption of the Anchorage 2020 plan received the 2001 Public Education Award from the American Planning Association."

    Arthur Hu in Washington State calls Educational Reform "Educational Deform:"
    http://www.arthurhu.com/INDEX/tqm.htm

    The Canadian Encylopedia gives a nice overview of the meaning of Social Class and the synthesis that "may eventually emerge": http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0007517

    Many thanks to Paul Barnes at truthforum.ca for bringing me back to this topic. And, thanks to Jim Rough for accusing Paul of not knowing enough about change agents to "trash" them. His post on truthforum.ca blog led me to do further investigation into his company activities, and in the process of studying his "new" Wisdom Councils in Pt. Townsend, WA, I not only got back on a very important aspect of ACL studies, but I also located my friend Betsy H. She's teaching math and english in a Pt. Townsend Middle School.

    For Christian readers, here's a nice "expose" of planned changes by Tony Campolo in Australia. http://www.despatch.cth.com.au/Books_D/CAMPOL_I.HTM

    Monday, December 24, 2007

    China-Vietnam trade corridor to displace 25,000

    Merry Christmas to all our friends and supporters! We hope all of you have a place to call home. God bless the people trying to save their nations from global communitarian integration.

    What do Trade and Wildlife Corridors have in common? They're both innovative ways to take private and public property, and to control all land and resources along the route.

    According to Dr. Amitai Etzioni, the world needs a new level of governance. That's because the world has become so complex only bankers, investors and economists can understand it. Highly skilled international traders should not have to abide by archaic national constitutions in these changing times. Every nation in the world must be rebuilt into a communitarian union.

    Enlightened communitarian thinkers agree that existing governments can't handle the confusing burden of international trade and communitarian environmental law. Etzioni said the "world needs a new global architecture" to make things easier. He advised the creation of "community" governance, a new system that builds new bureaucratic structures at every "community" level.

    At the top is the "global community."
    International Court of Justice, Hague, Netherlands & International Criminal Court, Rome, Italy, United Nations, Local Agenda 21, The Earth Charter, etc.

    Below that is the "regional community."
    European Court of Justice, European Community Court of Environmental Law, World Trade Organization (WTO, currently used in pre-integrated nations, will be abolished after the creation of a regional parliment), CAFTA, European Union, Afrcian Union, Middle Eastern Union, Asian Union, North American Union, etc.

    At the bottom are all the "local communities."
    Citizen Councils, Presidents Council for Sustainable Development, Community Policing, Faith-Based Initiatives, Urban Revitalization, Homeland Security, Communities of Character, Rebuilding Community, Community Economic Development, Smart Growth, Save the "whatever," Neighborhood Watch/Planning, 2020 Visions, Stakeholder groups (that reach consensus), 1000 "Friends" of globalism, etc.

    In community trade agreements all signing members must agree to the supremacy of communitarian law. Only self-appointed representatives are part of the decision-making process. If a member nation's voters bring an initiative to reject the agreement, the new justice system allows for a new, quieter agreement that simply negates whatever the voters said. The European Union is the "model" form of regional trade governance. It's copied by all.
    http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:f1E7ODzsZr8J:www.eu2007.pt/NR/rdonlyres/D707AF91-0240-422F-9067-B6312B52B083/0/20071011TRENweborptParlamentoEuropeudebateCimeiradeLisboa.pdf+lisbon+agreement+communitarian&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us&client=firefox-a

    It's not really that hard to see the same language and explanations used in every nation: "For more than 13 years NASCO and its members have stood at the forefront of driving public and private sectors to unite to address strategically critical national and international trade, transportation, security and environmental issues." http://www.nascocorridor.com/

    In the U.S.A., The Trans Texas Corridor project is another one of the communitarian corridor projects underway across the globe. http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/index.htm

    Alaska's Adventure Corridor is another communitarian highway project. (See Valdez, Alaska's use of the new term: http://www.valdezalaska.org/itineraries/itineraries.html)

    From Peter Meyer's elist:

    For China and Vietnam, a Highway Link Means Speedy Growth

    By DONALD GREENLEES

    Published: December 14, 2007
    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/14/world/asia/14road.html?ref=asia

    "Plans for a four-lane highway from Hanoi to Kunming cleared the last hurdle on Friday when the board of the Asian Development Bank gave the green light to a loan that will underwrite the Vietnamese side of the project.

    "By 2012, when the highway is supposed to be completed, a journey that now takes three days by truck could take just nine hours. Goods made in China's Yunnan Province would have quick access to the Vietnamese seaport of Haiphong, and Vietnamese exporters should be able to reach untapped markets in China."

    How does the Proposed National Animal Identification system (NAIS) tie into these corridors? The communitarians are doing an inventory of their new "assets." According to communitarians at Northwestern University, we're all unidentified assets that must be harvested for the rebuilt community. http://www.sesp.northwestern.edu/abcd/

    As Darren Weeks explained, there's a lot more going on behind these programs than officials will ever explain. Indeed, ALL government agencies devote space to dispelling the "myths," because of course the idea of a world government is ridiculous, the very idea of it being installed right under our noses is nothing but a wacko conspiracy theory...right?

    "George Hunt wrote: “Title to the lands will go to the World Wilderness Land Inventory Trust. This Trust will float into the World Conservation Bank by the unanimous decree of the world’s people, saying, God bless you for saving our reindeer. Those people at the congress were ignorant. They don’t suspect anything. They’re very naïve. Not stupid, ignorant. I’m talking about the 90% that were not the world banking heavyweights.”"

    http://www.newswithviews.com/brownfield/brownfield59.htm